Survival Outcome and Prognostic Factors After Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Sarcoma Patients: A 18-Year Experience at a Single High-volume Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic sarcoma patients have a poor prognosis with 3-year survival rate of 25%. About 30% of them present isolated lung metastases. We aimed to analyze the clinical outcome of sarcoma patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) and prognostic factors associated with local control, disease-free, and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All sarcoma patients undergoing PM at Humanitas Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. Analyzed variables included clinicopathologic, surgical, and survival data. Exclusion criterion comprised a follow-up period inferior to 1 year. A univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed (P<0.05). RESULTS: In total, 154 patients underwent PM from 1997 to 2015. Total complication rate was 7.1%. The median follow-up was 24 months. The median OS was 35.4 months from initial metastasectomy. In univariable analysis, we identified as significant negative prognostic factors a disease-free interval of <18 months, male sex, grading G3, and bilateral metastases. Three histology risk groups were defined according to OS: high risk (myxofibrosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, and Ewing sarcoma), intermediate risk (leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma), and low risk (synovial and chondrosarcoma) with a 3-year OS of 21.4%, 45.7%, and 74.1%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, male sex (P=0.042), bilateral metastases (P=0.004), and histology (intermediate vs. low-risk group, P=0.021; high vs. low-risk group, P<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: PM for sarcoma is a valid therapeutic option. High-risk histologies and bilaterality of lung metastases are independent negative prognostic factors. A prognostic score to improve patient selection is proposed.

Outcome appraisal of patients with limited brain metastases (BMs) from non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with different local therapeutic strategies: a single institute evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with limited brain metastases (BMs) treated with local approaches omitting whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). METHODS: Surgery was performed in case of a single, large BM, controlled extracranial disease and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) 90-100; stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS) was performed in all other cases. The prescribed dose was 24 Gy/1 fraction for lesions <2.5 cm, and a median of 30 Gy (24-40 Gy) in 3-5 fractions for lesions >2.5 cm. RESULTS: 156 patients treated for 228 BMs were retrospectively evaluated. The median age was 62 years. The majority of patients had a KPS 90-100, recursive partitioning analysis Class II, diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment score 2.5-3 and 1-2 BMs. Surgical resection was performed in 18 cases, and SRS/HSRS was performed in 210 cases. The 1-2-year local control was 87.2 ± 3.0% and 72.8 ± 5.0%; the 1.2-year brain distant failure was 30.8 ± 4.0% and 58.1 ± 6.0%; the 1-2-year overall survival was 60.9 ± 3.9% and 31.4 ± 4.0%. On univariate and multivariate analysis, the following factors influenced survival: age (p = 0.01), the presence of lymph node involvement (p = 0.03), KPS (p << 0.01), the presence of extracranial metastases at the time of BM treatment (p < 0.01), the number of BMs (p = 0.02) and the treatment performed (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The choice of an adequate local treatment can impact on survival in patients with limited BMs from NSCLC. A careful evaluation of prognostic and predictive factors is a pivotal additional aid. Advances in knowledge: Radiosurgery or surgery followed by radiosurgery on the tumour bed in place of WBRT proved to be an effective treatment influencing outcome. Surgical resection followed by SRS on the tumour bed has to be considered for lesions ≥15 mm, in patients with good KPS, age ≤70 years, adenocarcinoma histology and oligometastatic disease.

11C choline PET guided salvage radiotherapy with volumetric modulation arc therapy and hypofractionation for recurrent prostate cancer after HIFU failure: preliminary results of tolerability and acute toxicity.

The purpose of this work was to evaluate tolerance, feasibility and acute toxicity in patients undergoing salvage radiotherapy after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) failure. From 2005 to 2011 a total of 15 patients were treated with HIFU as primary radical treatment. Between July 2011 and February 2013, all 15 patients presented biochemical relapse after HIFU and 11C choline PET documenting intrapostatic-only failure. Salvage EBRT was performed with moderate hypofractionation schedule in 28 fractions with volumetric modulation arc therapy (VMAT). Genito-urinary (GU) and rectal and bowel toxicity were scored by common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4 (CTCAE V.4) scale. Biochemical response was assessed by ASTRO Phoenix criteria. Median age of patients was 67 years (range: 53-85). The median Gleason score was 7 (range: 6-9). The median prostate specific antigen (PSA) at the time of biochemical relapse after HIFU was 5.2 ng/mL (range: 2-64.2). Seven of the 15 patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) started after HIFU failure, interrupted before 11C choline PET and radiotherapy. Median prescribed dose was 71.4 Gy (range: 71.4-74.2 Gy) in 28 fractions. No radiation related major upper gastrointestinal (GI), rectal and GU toxicity were experienced. GU, acute grade 1 and grade 2 toxicities were recorded in 7/15 and 4/15 respectively; bowel acute grade 1 and grade 2 toxicities in 4/15 and 1/15; rectal acute grade 1 and grade 2 toxicities in 3/15 and 2/15 respectively. No grade 3 or greater acute or late toxicities occurred. Biochemical control was assessed in 12/15 (80%) patients. With a median follow up of 12 months, three out of 15 patients, with biochemical relapse, showed lymph-nodal recurrence. Our early clinical results and biochemical data confirm the feasibility and show a good tolerance of the 11C choline PET guided salvage radiation therapy after HIFU failure. The findings of low acute toxicity is encouraging, but longer follow-up is needed to assess late toxicity and definitive outcomes.

Feasibility and early clinical assessment of flattening filter free (FFF) based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments.

PURPOSE: To test feasibility and safety of clinical usage of Flattening Filter Free (FFF) beams for delivering ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) doses to various tumor sites, by means of Varian TrueBeam™ (Varian Medical Systems). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy patients were treated with SBRT and FFF: 51 lesions were in the thorax (48 patients),10 in the liver, 9 in isolated abdominal lymph node, adrenal gland or pancreas. Doses ranged from 32 to 75 Gy, depending on the anatomical site and the volume of the lesion to irradiate. Lung lesions were treated with cumulative doses of 32 or 48 Gy, delivered in 4 consecutive fractions. The liver patients were treated in 3 fractions with total dose of 75 Gy. The isolated lymph nodes were irradiated in 6 fractions with doses of 45 Gy. The inclusion criteria were the presence of isolated node, or few lymph nodes in the same lymph node region, in absence of other active sites of cancer disease before the SBRT treatment. RESULTS: All 70 patients completed the treatment. The minimum follow-up was 3 months. Six cases of acute toxicities were recorded (2 Grade2 and 2 Grade3 in lung and 2 Grade2 in abdomen). No patient experienced acute toxicity greater than Grade3. No other types or grades of toxicities were observed at clinical evaluation visits. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, with respect to acute toxicity, SBRT with FFF beams showed to be a feasible technique in 70 consecutive patients with various primary and metastatic lesions in the body.