Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 119
Filter
1.
Chronic Dis Can ; 29(3): 128-35, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19527571

ABSTRACT

The home represents an important source of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke for non-smokers, including children, who live with smokers. Our goal is to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with the adoption of smoking bans in "smoker households" in Quebec. Selected associations are compared with three other Canadian provinces (Ontario, British Columbia and Nova Scotia). This is a cross-sectional study involving 2648 respondents. Logistic regression analysis is employed. Few smoker households in Quebec (21%) have a ban on smoking; the presence of a non-smoker is strongly linked to the existence of such a ban; the presence of a child under the age of 6 is less strongly associated with the adoption of a ban in Quebec than in the other provinces, and the presence of an adolescent shows no association whatsoever. In addition to the child health benefits of household smoking bans, greater emphasis should be placed on the impact that such bans can have on children's future smoking behaviour. One option from a health promotion standpoint might be to organize a campaign aimed at non-smokers who live with smokers, in order to urge them to be less tolerant of environmental tobacco smoke.


Subject(s)
Family Characteristics , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , British Columbia , Child , Child Welfare/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Promotion , Health Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Nova Scotia , Ontario , Prevalence , Quebec/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/statistics & numerical data
2.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 29(7): 792-7, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15809663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to examine the relationship between obesity and all-cause mortality in women. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: The subjects were women enrolled from 1980 to 1985 in a Canadian randomized trial, the National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) to evaluate the efficacy of mammographic screening. Mortality was ascertained by record linkage to the Canadian Mortality Data Base. Hazard ratios (HR) for the association between body mass index (BMI) and all-cause mortality were obtained from Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: During an average follow-up period of 16.5 years, 2566 deaths were identified among the 49 165 women, age 40-59 y at enrollment. The risk of all-cause death increased linearly above a BMI of 22 kg/m(2) and the trend was statistically significant. The HR (and 95% confidence intervals) in the various categories of BMI (kg/m(2)) were: BMI<18.5: 1.12 (0.99-1.25); BMI 18.5-21.9: 1.00 (reference); BMI 22-24.9: 1.15 (1.11-1.18); BMI 25.0-27.9: 1.28 (1.24-1.32); BMI 28.0 -29.9: 1.34 (1.29-1.39); BMI 30.0-34.9: 1.30 (1.25,1.35); and BMI > or =35.0: 1.40 (1.33-1.47). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the association of high BMI with increased all-cause mortality in women.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Mortality , Adult , Alcohol Drinking , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Canada , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Diet , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Wounds and Injuries/complications
3.
Tob Control ; 12(4): 396-400, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14660775

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess public attitudes toward the tobacco industry and its products, and to identify predictors of attitudes supportive of tobacco industry denormalisation. DESIGN: Population based, cross sectional survey. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. SUBJECTS: Adult population (n = 1607). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eight different facets of tobacco industry denormalisation were assessed. A denormalisation scale was developed to examine predictors of attitudes supportive of tobacco industry denormalisation, using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Attitudes to the eight facets of tobacco industry denormalisation varied widely. More than half of the respondents supported regulating tobacco as a hazardous product, fining the tobacco industry for earnings from underage smoking, and suing tobacco companies for health care costs caused by tobacco. Majorities also thought that the tobacco industry is dishonest and that cigarettes are too dangerous to be sold at all. Fewer than half of the respondents thought that the tobacco industry is mostly or completely responsible for the health problems smokers have because of smoking and that tobacco companies should be sued for taxes lost from smuggling. In particular, less than a quarter thought that the tobacco industry is most responsible for young people starting to smoke. Non-smoking, knowledge about health effects caused by tobacco, and support for the role of government in health promotion were independent predictors of support for tobacco industry denormalisation. CONCLUSIONS: Although Ontarians are ambivalent toward tobacco industry denormalisation, they are supportive of some measures. Mass media programmes aimed at increasing support for tobacco industry denormalisation and continued monitoring of public attitudes toward this strategy are needed.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Public Opinion , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Industry , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Female , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Ontario/epidemiology
4.
Tob Control ; 12(2): 133-9, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12773721

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To propose and test a new classification system for characterising legislator support for various tobacco control policies. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SUBJECTS: Federal and provincial legislators in Canada serving as of October 1996 who participated in the Canadian Legislator Study (n = 553; response rate 54%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A three factor model (Voters, Tobacco industry, Other interest groups) that assigns nine tobacco control policies according to legislators' hypothesised perceptions of which group is more directly affected by these policies. RESULTS: Based on confirmatory factor analysis, the proposed model had an acceptable fit and showed construct validity. Multivariate analysis indicated that three of the predictors (believing that the government has a role in health promotion, being a non-smoker, and knowledge that there are more tobacco than alcohol caused deaths) were associated with all three factor scales. Several variables were associated with two of the three scales. Some were unique to each scale. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analyses, legislator support for tobacco control policies can be grouped according to our a priori factor model. The information gained from this work can help advocates understand how legislators think about different types of tobacco control policies. This could lead to the development of more effective advocacy strategies.


Subject(s)
Smoking Prevention , Analysis of Variance , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Politics , Public Opinion , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence
5.
Tob Control ; 10(4): 364-7, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11740029

ABSTRACT

Although internet use continues to increase and e-commerce sales are expected to exceed US$1 trillion by the end of 2001, there have been few assessments in the literature regarding the implications of this medium for tobacco control efforts. This commentary explores the challenges that the internet may pose to the key components of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy, and pinpoints potential approaches for addressing these challenges. Four key challenges that the internet presents for tobacco control are identified: unrestricted sales to minors; cheaper cigarettes through tax avoidance and smuggling; unfettered advertising, marketing and promotion; and continued normalisation of the tobacco industry and its products. Potential strategies for addressing these challenges include international tobacco control agreements, national and state regulation, and legal remedies.


Subject(s)
Commerce/economics , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Nicotiana , Smoking Prevention , Smoking/economics , Advertising , Humans , International Cooperation , Tobacco Industry
6.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 3(3): 257-60, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11506769

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between nicotine dependence and attitudes, predicted behaviours and support regarding restrictions on smoking. DESIGN: Population-based, computer-assisted, telephone survey of adults in Ontario, Canada using a two-stage stratified sampling design; 1764 interviews were completed (65% response rate) yielding 424 (24%) cigarette smokers, of whom 354 (83%) smoked daily. The Heaviness of Smoking Index was used as a measure of nicotine dependence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Attitudes toward smoking restrictions, predicted compliance with more restrictions, and support for total smoking bans. RESULTS: Attitudes favorable to smoking restrictions tended to decrease with increased nicotine dependence, but the associations were not statistically significant after adjusting for demographic variables. Predicted compliance with more restrictions on smoking decreased with higher levels of dependence, as did support for a total ban on smoking in restaurants, workplaces, bingo halls, and hockey arenas. Support for smoking bans in food courts, family fast food restaurants, and bars and taverns did not vary significantly with level of nicotine dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Level of nicotine dependence is associated with intended behaviors and support for smoking restrictions in some settings. These results have implications for tobacco control programs and policies.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Behavior, Addictive/psychology , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Smoking Prevention , Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Use Disorder/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Environment , Female , Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Smoking/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tobacco Use Disorder/diagnosis , Tobacco Use Disorder/epidemiology
9.
Brain Inj ; 15(5): 435-42, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11350657

ABSTRACT

The Independent Living Scale (ILS) was developed in a post-acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation facility over a 15-year period to assess three main areas: (1) activities of daily living, (2) behaviour, and (3) initiation. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the ILS, including test--retest stability, construct validity, and statistical fit. Statistical analysis was completed on all weekly scores between the years 1986-1995 (n = 5250). A previous study showed ILS inter-rater reliability to be 0.85 and convergent validity 0.82--0.87. This study demonstrated a test--retest stability of 0.72, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy 0.94 (marvelous), and a Bartlett Test of Sphericity result of 'scale items independent'. The ILS was shown to have good construct validity, inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, instrument stability, and convergent validity.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Behavior , Brain Injuries/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychometrics , Quality of Life , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Can J Public Health ; 92(6): 407-11, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11799542

ABSTRACT

Using two population-based surveys of Ontarians, we examined the proportions of smokers who smoke 'light' and 'mild' cigarettes (L/M). We compared L/M smokers to regular cigarette smokers regarding demographic, health knowledge, and smoking characteristics and examined their health-related perceptions of L/M and reasons for smoking them. Use of these cigarettes increased from 71% in 1996 to 83% in 2000. Those who smoked L/M were more likely to be female, to be less addicted, and to be more advanced toward quitting. In 1996, one in five believed that smoking L/M lowers the risk of cancer and heart disease. In 1996 and 2000, respectively, 44% and 27% smoked L/M to reduce health risks, 41% and 40% smoked them as a step toward quitting, and 41% in both years said they would be more likely to quit if they learned L/M could provide the same tar and nicotine as regular cigarettes. These data provide empirical support for banning 'light' and 'mild' on cigarette packaging.


Subject(s)
Advertising , Nicotine/analysis , Smoke/analysis , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking/psychology , Tars/analysis , Adult , Data Collection , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male
13.
Tob Control ; 9(4): 364-71, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11106705

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if smokers and non-smokers cluster into meaningful, discrete subgroups with distinguishable attitudes and behaviours regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. DESIGN: Qualitative research with 45 smokers guided development of questionnaire items applied in a population based telephone survey of 432 current smokers and 1332 non-smokers in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Cluster analysis of questionnaire items used to categorise adult smokers and non-smokers; comparison of clusters on sociodemographic characteristics and composite knowledge and attitude scores. RESULTS: Smokers clustered in three groups. "Reluctant" smokers (16%) show more concern about other people discovering that they smoke, but parallel "easygoing" smokers (42%) in supporting restrictions on smoking and not smoking around others. "Adamant" smokers (42%) feel restrictions have gone too far, and are less likely to accommodate non-smokers. Significant gradients across categories in the expected direction were observed with respect to smoking status, stage of change, knowledge, and attitude scores, and predicted compliance with restrictions, validating the proposed typology. Non-smokers also clustered into three groups, of which the "adamant" non-smokers (45%) are the least favourably disposed to smoking. "Unempowered" non-smokers (34%) also oppose smoking, but tend not to act on it. "Laissez-faire" non-smokers (21%) are less opposed to smoking in both attitude and behaviour. A significant gradient across categories in the expected direction was observed with respect to composite scores regarding knowledge of the health effects of active and passive smoking and a composite score on support for restrictions on smoking in public places. CONCLUSION: Recognition and consideration of the types of smokers and non-smokers in the population and their distinguishing characteristics could inform the development of tobacco control policies and programmes and suggest strategies to assist implementation.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Health Behavior , Nicotiana , Plants, Toxic , Smoking Prevention , Smoking/psychology , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Can J Public Health ; 91(5): 376-80, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11089293

ABSTRACT

Using data from a 1996 random-digit-dialing computer-assisted telephone survey of Ontario adults, 424 smokers and 1,340 nonsmokers were compared regarding knowledge about the health effects of tobacco use, attitudes toward restrictions on smoking and other tobacco control measures, and predictions of compliance with more restrictions. The response rate was 65%. Smokers were less knowledgeable than nonsmokers. Smokers were also less likely to support bans on smoking in specific locations, but majorities of both groups supported some restriction in most settings. Smokers were more likely than nonsmokers to predict that most smokers would comply with more restrictions, and more than three quarters indicated that they, themselves, would comply. Sizable proportions of both groups, especially smokers, failed to appreciate the effectiveness of taxation in reducing smoking. Support for other control measures also differed by smoking status. Both knowledge and smoking status were independently associated with support for more restrictions and other tobacco control policy measures.


Subject(s)
Drug and Narcotic Control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Data Collection/statistics & numerical data , Female , Guideline Adherence , Health Policy , Humans , Male , Ontario , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence
17.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 64(2): 201-9, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11194456

ABSTRACT

Available epidemiological evidence indicates that alcohol intake is associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer. Plausible biological pathways include its effect on levels of estrogens, cell membrane integrity and cell-to-cell communication, inhibition of DNA repair, and congener effect. The present study evaluated the impact of alcohol on mortality from breast cancer, an area with relatively few studies in the literature. The subjects were participants in a Canadian prospective cohort study, the National Breast Screening Study (NBSS). Women were enrolled in the cohort from 1980 to 1985 to evaluate the efficacy of mammographic screening. Information on usual diet and alcohol intake at enrolment and other epidemiological variables was collected by means of a mailed, self-administered questionnaire. Mortality from breast cancer during follow- up to 31 December, 1993 was ascertained by record linkage to the Canadian Mortality Data Base maintained by Statistics Canada. During the follow-up period of 1980-1993 (average 10.3 years), 223 deaths from breast cancer were identified for this analysis. The hazard ratios for the risk of death from breast cancer increased with intakes of total alcohol of 10-20 g/day (1.039, 1.009-1.071) and > 20 g/day ( 1.063, 1.029-1.098). This increase was contributed largely by the intake of wine, a 15% increase in risk at intakes higher than 10 g/day of alcohol from wine. Alcohol from spirits was associated with a small decrease in risk of death (hazard ratio at 10g/day, 0.945, 0.915-0.976). The effect of alcohol from beer was not significant in the two categories studied. Although our results were statistically significant, the magnitude of the change in risk was small.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Wine/adverse effects
18.
Can J Public Health ; 90(5): 330-3, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10570578

ABSTRACT

Few studies have employed a qualitative approach to better understand how both smokers and non-smokers experience and make sense of no-smoking restrictions in their daily lives. We describe qualitative research involving an examination of self-reported interpersonal interactions between smokers and non-smokers in public places regarding exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Five focus group discussions and twenty individual in-depth interviews were conducted with smokers and non-smokers in the Metropolitan Toronto region as a complement to a quantitative survey of the adult population of Ontario. Strategies used by non-smokers in responding to ETS exposures included verbal confrontations, non-verbal cues, use of a third party, and moving away. The perceived consequences of such actions, as described by both smokers and non-smokers, are discussed, together with implications for tobacco control policy and practice.


Subject(s)
Interpersonal Relations , Smoking/psychology , Social Behavior , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario
19.
Can J Public Health ; 90(4): 264-70, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10489725

ABSTRACT

In 1997 the Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario and Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse released updated guidelines for low-risk alcohol consumption. This paper presents the scientific rationale behind this statement. Important comprehensive overviews on the consequences of alcohol use were studied. Formal meta-analyses on morbidity and mortality were examined wherever possible. Individual elements from similar guidelines were investigated for their scientific foundation. Limited original analyses defined risk levels by average weekly consumption. The evidence reviewed demonstrated that placing limits on both daily intake and cumulative intake over the typical week is justifiable for the prevention of important causes of morbidity and mortality. Gender-specific limits on weekly consumption were also indicated. In these updated guidelines intended for primary prevention, days of abstinence are not necessarily recommended. Intoxication should be avoided and abstinence is sometimes advisable. Available evidence does not strongly favour one alcoholic beverage over another for cardiovascular health benefits.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Evidence-Based Medicine , Guidelines as Topic , Health Behavior , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/blood , Alcohol Drinking/mortality , Canada/epidemiology , Epidemiologic Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Characteristics
20.
Can J Public Health ; 90(4): 272-6, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10489726

ABSTRACT

We used the 1997 Ontario Drug Monitor, a population-based, random-digit dialing survey of 2,776 adults, to obtain a baseline assessment of alcohol drinking by Ontarians against the 1997 low-risk drinking guidelines of the Addiction Research Foundation and the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Average weekly alcohol consumption and the frequency of exceeding the daily limit, estimated using the graduated frequency scale, were determined for the population overall, and by sex and age group (18-44 and 45+ years). Most Ontarians drank alcohol in a pattern associated with a low risk of health consequences. About 10% of women and 25% of men drank in a style associated with some increase in acute or long-term risk. Younger men were most likely to drink in a risky pattern. Most drinkers of middle age or older, for whom cardiovascular disease is a significant health risk, consumed alcohol in a pattern associated with cardiovascular benefit.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Guidelines as Topic , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL