Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
2.
J Thorac Oncol ; 17(4): 532-543, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092841

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed a comprehensive national radiotherapy data set to compare outcomes of the most frequently used moderate hypofractionation regimen (55 Gy in 20 fractions) and conventional fractionation regimen (60-66 Gy in 30-33 fractions). METHODS: A total of 169,863 cases of NSCLC registered in England from January 2012 to December 2016 obtained from the Public Health England were divided into cohort 1 (training set) diagnosed in 2012 to 2013 and cohort 2 (validation set) diagnosed in 2014 to 2016. Radiotherapy data were obtained from the National Radiotherapy Dataset and linked by National Health Service number to survival data from the Office of National Statistics and Hospital Episode Statistics, from which surgical data and Charlson comorbidity index were obtained. Of 73,186 patients with stages I to III NSCLC, 12,898 received radical fractionated radiotherapy (cohort 1-4894; cohort 2-8004). The proportional hazards model was used to investigate overall survival from time of diagnosis. Survival was adjusted for the prognostic factors of age, sex, stage of disease, comorbidity, other radical treatments, and adjuvant chemotherapy, and the difference between the treatment schedules was summarized by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval. The significance of any difference was evaluated by the log likelihood test. RESULTS: Of patients with stages I to III NSCLC, 17% to 18% received radical fractionated radiotherapy. After adjustment for independent prognostic factors of age, stage, comorbidity, and other radical and adjuvant treatments, patients in cohort 1 treated with the 2.75 Gy per fraction regimen had a median survival of 25 months compared with 29 months for patients treated with the 2 Gy per fraction regimen (HR = 1.16, p = 0.001). Similarly, in cohort 2, the respective median survival values were 25 and 28 months (HR = 1.10, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Big data analysis of a comprehensive national cohort of patients with NSCLC treated in England suggests that compared with a 4-week regimen of 55 Gy in 20 fractions, a 6-week regimen of conventional daily fractionation to a dose of 60 to 66 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction is associated with a survival benefit. Within the limitations of the retrospective big data analysis with potential selection bias and in the absence of randomized trials, the results suggest that conventional fractionation regimens should remain the standard of care.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Infant , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , State Medicine , Treatment Outcome
3.
Radiother Oncol ; 132: 204-210, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392781

ABSTRACT

AIM: Regional utilisation of radical radiotherapy (RT) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was used to define optimal utilisation to improve outcome and as a surrogate for evidence of RT efficacy. PATIENTS & METHODS: 65,412 NSCLC cases diagnosed in England 2012-13 were linked to comprehensive national radiotherapy dataset, hospital admissions and the Office of National Statistics. Geographical variation in utilisation was determined using a multivariate binary logistic regression analysis after adjusting for age, stage, deprivation, comorbidity and other radical treatment and the effect of radical RT utilisation on survival was investigated. Survival was adjusted for dependent and independent variables and the effect of differing levels of utilisation was assessed by the log likelihood test. RESULTS: 17.6% cases potentially eligible for radical RT (stages 0-III) received radiotherapy with radical intent. Utilisation of radical RT had an impact on survival (p < 0.00001). Adjusting for all prognostic and treatment variables counties with lowest utilisation (≤15%) had the worst survival (HR = 1.13). The highest utilisation quintile counties (≥25%) had worse survival compared to counties with lower utilisation (≈20%) (p < 0.0001). Analysis of stages II&III showed the same pattern; increase in utilisation from 20% to ≥25% resulting in a 3% drop in 2-year population survival (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The utilisation of radical RT has a significant impact on NSCLC population survival. Improvement in survival of NSCLC population can be achieved by offering radical RT to a larger proportion of patients while avoiding excessive use. Geographical variation in RT utilisation provides indirect evidence of survival benefit of radical radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Radiotherapy Dosage , Registries , Treatment Outcome
4.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 10(3): 171-176, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28100469

ABSTRACT

The randomized, double-blinded Royal Marsden Tamoxifen Breast Cancer Prevention Trial in healthy high-risk women started in 1986 and is still blinded. Eligible participants (n = 2,471) were randomly assigned to tamoxifen (20 mg/d) or placebo for 8 years. Analysis in 2006 showed a 30% risk reduction of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive invasive breast cancer mostly in the posttreatment period. Biomarker analysis in this population may identify any subgroup-specific preventive effects tamoxifen. After a median follow-up of 18.4 years, 242 patients had developed invasive cancer, 134 on placebo and 108 on tamoxifen. From these, 180 tissue blocks were available and ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki67, HER2, and EGFR were immunohistochemically analyzed. A 32% reduction in ER+ and PgR+ invasive cancers resulted after 8 years of treatment. Quantitative levels of ER and PgR were lower in the tamoxifen-treated group, significantly so for ER (P = 0.001). These lower ER levels were restricted to the posttreatment period (P = 0.018). Among the ER+ group, there was a similar proportional decrease in PgR+ and PgR- tumors by tamoxifen. The median levels of Ki67 were similar in both arms. The numbers of HER2-positive and EGFR-positive cancers were higher in the tamoxifen arm but not significantly so. In conclusion, the preventive effects of tamoxifen result in reduced ER-positive but not ER-negative tumors and reduced ER expression in the ER-positive cases largely confined to the posttreatment period. Overall reductions in PgR expression are explained by lower frequency of ER-positive cases. Impact on Ki67, HER2, and EGFR was modest. Cancer Prev Res; 10(3); 171-6. ©2017 AACR.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , ErbB Receptors/analysis , ErbB Receptors/biosynthesis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Ki-67 Antigen/biosynthesis , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptor, ErbB-2/biosynthesis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/biosynthesis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/biosynthesis
6.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 10(3): 165-70, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21855037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The benefit of induction chemotherapy (IC) before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for inoperable esophageal adenocarcinoma has not been established. To clarify toxicities and outcomes of combined modality treatment, we performed a retrospective review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients were identified. Fifty-one patients had CRT, 17 had radiotherapy (RT). Fifty-eight received IC before RT. IC consisted of 4 cycles of platinum and fluoropyrimidines followed by CRT 54 Gy with concurrent infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine. Response to IC was assessed at 3 months and response to CRT at 3 months. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) are reported. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were men and 14 were women, with median age 72 years (range, 42-87 years). There were 29 stage II, 33 stage III, 4 stage IVa, and 2 stage IVb tumors. The response 3 months after completion of treatment was 39.6%. No grade 4 toxicity was reported, but 10/58 patients had grade 3 toxicity from IC. The median TTP and OS from RT for the entire cohort was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-18) and 16 months (95% CI, 5-27), respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates from diagnosis were 73% and 47%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in TTP or OS in patients who responded to IC compared with those who did not (median TTP 11 vs. 12 months, respectively; P = .8; median OS 15 vs. 14 months, respectively; P = .8). CONCLUSION: The outcome in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus after CRT is comparable to unselected surgical series. Response to IC is not always an indicator of eventual outcome.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Capecitabine , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/secondary , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/analogs & derivatives , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
7.
Cancer ; 112(7): 1585-91, 2008 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18278813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of palliative chemotherapy was investigated in a large group of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) treated on routine palliative protocols. METHODS: Patients with STS who had first-line chemotherapy for advanced and/or metastatic disease between 1991 and 2005 were identified from the Royal Marsden Hospital's sarcoma database. Patients with Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors were excluded from the study. RESULTS: In all, 488 patients (242 male, 246 female) fulfilled the study criteria. The median age was 49 years and the majority (83%) received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The most common histologic subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (35%) synovial sarcoma (13%), liposarcoma (10%), and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (10%). In all, 61% received single-agent chemotherapy, usually doxorubicin. An objective response was reported in 33% of patients (53% in those with synovial sarcoma); 22% had stable disease and 45% derived 'clinical benefit' (objective responses + stable disease for >or= 6 months). Median duration of response was 9 months and median posttreatment overall survival (OS) was 12 months. In multivariate analysis, age <40 years, liposarcoma, and synovial histology were found to be positive, and bone involvement to be negative, independent prognostic factors. Patients treated with combination chemotherapy experienced longer OS than those treated with a single agent. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative chemotherapy may be beneficial in approximately half of patients with advanced STS. Synovial sarcoma and liposarcoma subtypes have a better prognosis. However, the overall poor outcome of these patients indicates the need to continue the search for more effective agents.


Subject(s)
Sarcoma/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Palliative Care , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/pathology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate
8.
Radiother Oncol ; 82(1): 90-5, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17161483

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the technique and results of stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) in patients with craniopharyngioma after conservative surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-nine patients with craniopharyngioma aged 3-68 years (median age 18 years) were treated with SCRT between June 1994 and January 2003. All patients were referred for radiotherapy after undergoing one or more surgical procedures. Treatment was delivered in 30-33 daily fractions over 6-6.5 weeks to a total dose of 50 Gy using 6 MV photons. Outcome was assessed prospectively. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 40 months (range 3-88 months) the 3- and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 97% and 92%, and 3- and 5-year survival 100%. Two patients required further debulking surgery for progressive disease 8 and 41 months after radiotherapy. Twelve patients (30%) had acute clinical deterioration due to cystic enlargement of craniopharyngioma following SCRT and required cyst aspiration. One patient with severe visual impairment prior to radiotherapy had visual deterioration following SCRT. Seven out of 10 patients with a normal pituitary function before SCRT had no endocrine deficits following treatment. CONCLUSION: SCRT as a high-precision technique of localized RT is suitable for the treatment of incompletely excised craniopharyngioma. The local control, toxicity and survival outcomes are comparable to results reported following conventional external beam RT. Longer follow-up is required to assess long-term efficacy and toxicity, particularly in terms of potential reduction in treatment related late toxicity.


Subject(s)
Craniopharyngioma/radiotherapy , Pituitary Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniopharyngioma/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypothalamus/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged , Pituitary Gland/radiation effects , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vision, Ocular/radiation effects
9.
Clin Cancer Res ; 12(3 Pt 2): 1024s-1030s, 2006 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16467120

ABSTRACT

The study of changes in proliferation as a marker of treatment benefit during presurgical endocrine treatment of breast cancer has become increasingly popular, particularly using the nuclear marker Ki67, and holds the potential for prioritizing new treatments for full clinical development. There are weakly significant relationships between Ki67 change and clinical response that differ according to data handling. In the neoadjuvant Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen trial, suppression of Ki67 at both 2 and 12 weeks was greater with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole than with either tamoxifen or the combination of anastrozole and tamoxifen. We report here that absolute values of Ki67 after 2 weeks were also significantly lower with anastrozole than with tamoxifen and the combination. This indicates that it may be possible to make such comparisons using surgical samples only. We argue that these changes in proliferation and concurrent changes in apoptosis may be expected to be more predictive of adjuvant benefit from endocrine therapy than clinical response.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Apoptosis/drug effects , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Anastrozole , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , In Situ Nick-End Labeling , Ki-67 Antigen/drug effects , Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Triazoles/therapeutic use
10.
J Clin Oncol ; 23(22): 5108-16, 2005 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15998903

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined With Tamoxifen (IMPACT) trial was designed to test the hypothesis that the clinical and/or biologic effects of neoadjuvant tamoxifen compared with anastrozole and with the combination of tamoxifen and anastrozole before surgery in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive, invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer might predict for outcome in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) adjuvant therapy trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with ER-positive, invasive, nonmetastatic, and operable or locally advanced potentially operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant tamoxifen (20 mg daily), anastrozole (1 mg daily), or a combination of tamoxifen and anastrozole for 3 months. The tumor objective response (OR) was assessed by both caliper and ultrasound. Comparisons were also made of clinical response with ultrasound response, actual and feasible surgery with feasible surgery at baseline, OR in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers, and tolerability. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in OR in the intent-to-treat population between patients receiving tamoxifen, anastrozole, or the combination. In patients who were assessed as requiring mastectomy at baseline (n = 124), 44% of patients received breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after anastrozole compared with 31% of patients after tamoxifen (P = .23); this difference became significant for patients who were deemed feasible for BCS by their surgeon (46% v 22%, respectively; P = .03). The OR for patients with HER2-positive cancer (n = 34) was 58% for anastrozole compared with 22% for tamoxifen (P = .18). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant anastrozole is as effective and well tolerated as tamoxifen in ER-positive operable breast cancer in postmenopausal women, but the hypothesis that clinical outcome might predict for long-term outcome in adjuvant therapy was not fulfilled.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastrozole , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Nitriles/administration & dosage , Odds Ratio , Placebos , Postmenopause , Tamoxifen/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Triazoles/administration & dosage
11.
J Clin Oncol ; 23(11): 2477-92, 2005 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15767642

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationships between biomarker changes in breast cancer during neoadjuvant (preoperative) endocrine therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IMPACT trial compared the preoperative use of tamoxifen with anastrozole alone or in combination in postmenopausal women (n = 330) with primary breast cancer. Biomarkers were measured in tumor biopsy specimens taken at baseline, and after 2 and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: 52 (93%) of 56, 46 (85%) of 54, and 37 (84%) of 44 patients in the anastrozole, tamoxifen, and combination groups, respectively. There was a significantly greater suppression of Ki67 in the anastrozole-treated group than in the tamoxifen- or combination-treated groups, which is parallel to the greater efficacy seen for anastrozole over these two treatments in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination adjuvant trial. A positive relationship was noted between estrogen-receptor level and Ki67 suppression in all patients. Ki67 was reduced to a greater extent in progesterone receptor-positive tumors compared with progesterone receptor-negative tumors. HER-2-negative tumors tended to show a greater reduction in Ki67 compared with HER-2-positive tumors, but the difference was only significant in the tamoxifen group after 2 weeks, and in the anastrozole group after 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the value of Ki67 as a molecular marker, and provide information regarding the relationships between treatment-induced changes in Ki67 and other important biomarkers. Studies such as this should help integrate agents targeted at growth factor signaling with endocrine agents in breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Aged , Anastrozole , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Cell Proliferation , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Nitriles/administration & dosage , Postmenopause , Predictive Value of Tests , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Tamoxifen/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Triazoles/administration & dosage
12.
Clin Cancer Res ; 11(2 Pt 2): 951s-8s, 2005 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15701892

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy for breast cancer may allow for the development of intermediate markers of treatment benefit, thereby circumventing the need for efficacy trials of adjuvant therapy, which require much larger patient numbers and longer follow-up. The aim of this study--as part of the Immediate Preoperative "Arimidex" (anastrozole), Tamoxifen, or Arimidex Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) trial (n = 330)--was to test the hypotheses that changes in Ki-67 after 2 weeks and/or 12 weeks: (i) differed between treatments, (ii) predicted clinical tumor response, and/or (iii) may predict long-term outcome differences between treatments in adjuvant therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial compared these same agents in the adjuvant setting. Biomarkers were measured in biopsy specimens taken before and after 2 and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Suppression of the proliferation marker Ki-67 after 2 and 12 weeks was significantly greater with anastrozole than with tamoxifen (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001) but was similar between tamoxifen and the combination (P = 0.600 and P = 0.912). This result closely parallels that seen for the relative recurrence-free survival with the treatments after a median follow-up of 31 months in the ATAC trial in 9,366 patients. Against expectations, apoptosis was not increased in any of the treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that short-term changes in proliferation in the neoadjuvant setting may be able to predict outcome during adjuvant use of the same treatments. If this can be confirmed, these findings could lead to a profound change in approaches to drug development in breast cancer. The data indicate that estrogen is not an important survival factor for human breast cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Apoptosis/drug effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Aged , Anastrozole , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Nitriles/administration & dosage , Survival Rate , Tamoxifen/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Triazoles/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...