Performance of the Enzyme Linked Fluorescent Assay in Diagnosis of HIV Infection; Comparative Evaluation with other Methods.

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to investigate the role of the enzyme linked fluorescent assay (ELFA) method in the diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection by comparing it with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescent microplate immunoassay (CMIA) methods and its role in the HIV diagnostic algorithm and to update the recommended algorithm for HIV testing. METHODS: We evaluated 101 HIV-reactive and 101 HIV-negative specimens. All samples were studied with the methods of anti HIV1/2 test micro-ELISA, ELFA, and CMIA. At the same time, HIV RNA PCR and western blot (WB)/rapid immunochromatographic test (RICT) were also studied with the same samples. RESULTS: All HIV RNA and WB positive samples (n = 101) were positive with micro-ELISA, CMIA and ELFA. Twenty-five negative samples of HIV RNA and WB were positive with micro-ELISA and CMIA, while just 6 samples were positive with ELFA. When all samples were evaluated together, the false positivity rate of the ELFA method was found to be 5.9%, and the false positivity rates of the micro-ELISA and CMIA methods were determined to be 31.7% and 30.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It was determined that there is a high level of agreement between the ELFA method and confirmation tests. It was thought that it might take place in the preconfirmation stage. As can be seen from the results obtained, the false positive rate by ELFA method was found to be about five times lower than that of micro-ELISA and CMIA methods. Considering that antigen (p24) and antibody positivity can be given separately with this aspect, it can be considered that there is a confirmation place in HIV diagnosis algorithm.

A Predictive Test in The Screening of HIV Positive Cases; Interferon Gamma Inducible Protein 10 (IP-10).

BACKGROUND: HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), causing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), is one of the most important health problems in the world. Certain cytokines produced during the cytokine storm in an acute infection can be biomarker candidates. The strong association of IFN-γ inducible protein 10 (IP-10) with low CD4 cell counts suggests that it can be an acute phase biomarker. METHODS: In this study, IP-10 was monitored at routine controls during pre-treatment and/or in subsequent phases of treatment, and its correlation with CD4 cell count and viral load was assessed. Venous blood samples, taken from 30 patients (at 0 - 3 - 6 months), and 20 healthy volunteers, were sent to the Laboratory for flow cytometry, nucleic acid tests (NAT) and ELISA tests. RESULTS: The mean IP-10 concentration of patients was 344 pg/mL, and these values for the untreated, treated and control groups were 422 pg/mL and 210 pg/mL and 68 pg/mL respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the IP-10 values of the patient and control groups (p = 0.006). There was a significant, positive and moderate relation between IP-10 and viral load values (r = 0.59, p < 0.001), while there was a significant, negative and moderate relation between IP-10 and CD4 cell count (r = -0.51, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IP-10 levels in early HIV-1 patients, which are shown to be closely related to CD4 cell levels and viral replication, may be an alternative or support marker compared to the more expensive viral load tests in monitor-ing viremia changes and response to antiretroviral treatment.