Effect of Matrix Size and Acquisition Mode on Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Ultra-High-Resolution CT of the Temporal Bone: An Anatomical Study.

Purpose: To compare image quality and radiation exposure between super- and ultra-high-resolution helical and super-high-resolution volumetric CT of the temporal bone. Methods: Six cadaveric temporal bone specimens were used to evaluate key temporal bone structures using the following CT reconstruction and acquisition modes: helical and single-volume acquisition modes in super-high resolution (0.25-mm slice thickness, 10242 matrix), and helical mode in ultra-high resolution (0.25-mm slice thickness, 20482 matrix). Two observers performed 5 previously described preoperative measurements, measured noise and signal-to-noise ratios for air, and noise for bone, and rated the visualization of 5 anatomical structures on a 4-point scale, for each reconstruction mode. Radiation dose exposure was recorded for each examination. Results: There was no significant difference between any of the quantitative or qualitative measurements in any of the reconstruction and acquisition modes. There was a slight increase in noise and a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio in the air using the single-volume mode (115 ± 13.1 HU and 8.37 ± 0.91, respectively) compared to the helicoidal super-high-resolution (92.4 ± 11.8 HU and 10.8 ± 1.26, respectively) and helicoidal ultra-high-resolution (91.1 ± 10.7 HU and 10.9 ± 1.39, respectively) modes (P < .002). The volumic CT dose index was 50.9 mGy with helical acquisition and 29.8 mGy with single-volume acquisition mode (P < .0001). Conclusion: The single-volume super-high-resolution acquisition mode allows a reduction in radiation dose exposure without compromising image quality compared to helical scanning, but with a slightly lower signal-to-noise ratio in air with the single-volume mode, while there was no difference in image quality between the helical super- and ultra-high-resolution modes.

Radiation dose reduction and image quality improvement with ultra-high resolution temporal bone CT using deep learning-based reconstruction: An anatomical study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the achievable radiation dose reduction of an ultra-high resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) scanner using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) while maintaining temporal bone image quality equal to or better than high-resolution CT (HR-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: UHR-CT acquisitions were performed with variable tube voltages and currents at eight different dose levels (volumic CT dose index [CTDIvol] range: 4.6-79 mGy), 10242 matrix, and 0.25 mm slice thickness and reconstructed using DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms. HR-CT images were acquired using a standard protocol (120 kV/220 mAs; CTDI vol, 54.2 mGy, 5122 matrix, and 0.5 mm slice thickness). Two radiologists rated the image quality of seven structures using a five point confidence scale on six cadaveric temporal bone CTs. A global image quality score was obtained for each CT protocol by summing the image quality scores of all structures. RESULTS: With DLR, UHR-CT at 120 kV/220 mAs (CTDIvol, 50.9 mGy) and 140 kV/220 mAs (CTDIvol, 79 mGy) received the highest global image quality scores (4.88 ± 0.32 [standard deviation (SD)] [range: 4-5] and 4.85 ± 0.35 [range: 4-5], respectively; P = 0.31), while HR-CT at 120 kV/220 mAs and UHR-CT at 120 kV/20 mAs received the lowest (i.e., 3.14 ± 0.75 [SD] [range: 2-5] and 2.97 ± 0.86 [SD] [range: 1-5], respectively; P = 0.14). All the DLR protocols had better image quality scores than HR-CT with HIR. CONCLUSION: UHR-CT with DLR can be performed with up to a tenfold reduction in radiation dose compared to HR-CT with HIR while maintaining or improving image quality.

Cadaveric assessment of a 3D-printed aiming device for implantation of a hinged elbow external fixator.

INTRODUCTION: Proper implantation of a hinged external elbow fixator (HEEF) is demanding since it requires precise alignment between the flexion-extension's and HEEF's axis. In order to optimize this alignment, we have developed a 3D-printed aiming device. The primary goal of the study was to compare the aiming device-based technique with the conventional pin technique. The secondary goal was to determine whether it is possible to share the aiming device with the surgical community. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A HEEF was implanted in cadavers with either the aiming device (n = 6) or the conventional pin technique (n = 6). For both techniques the duration of the procedure, the radiation exposure as well as the offset and angular divergence between the HEEF's and flexion-extension's axis were compared. To achieve the secondary goal, two surgeons used aiming devices 3D-printed from files sent by email in order to implant HEEF on cadaveric specimens (n = 6). RESULTS: Duration of the procedure was not significantly different between both techniques. However, the aiming device allowed for reduction of the number of image intensifier shots (p = 0.005), angular divergence (p = 0.02) and offset between both axes (p = 0.05). The aiming devices have been delivered less than 15 days after ordering, and they have allowed proper implantation of six HEEF. CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed aiming device allowed less irradiant and more accurate implantation of HEEF. It is possible to share it with other surgeons.

Squared ligament of the elbow: anatomy and contribution to forearm stability.

OBJECTIVE: The present study describes the macroscopic and microscopic features of the squared ligament of the elbow (SLE). In addition, the SLE biomechanical behavior and contribution to the forearm stability were also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten forearms from freshly frozen cadavers were used for this work. Each forearm was mounted in an experimental frame for quantification of longitudinal and transverse stability. Macroscopic features and biomechanical behavior were analyzed on dynamic videos obtained during forearm rotation. Then, the SLE was harvested from the 10 forearms for microscopic analysis on histological slices stained with hematoxylin-eosin-saffron. RESULTS: Two main SLE configurations were identified. One in which the SLE had three distinct bundles (anterior, middle, posterior) and another in which it was homogeneous. The anterior part of the SLE had a mean length of 11.2 mm (±2.4 mm) and a mean width of 1.2 mm (±0.2 mm) while the posterior part had a mean length of 9.9 mm (±2.2 mm) and a mean width of 1 mm (±0.2 mm). Microscopic examination showed that the SLE is composed of a thin layer of arranged collagen fibers. During forearm rotation, the SLE progressively tightens upon pronation and supination by wrapping around the radial neck. Tightening of the SLE during forearm rotation provides transverse and longitudinal stability to the forearm, mainly in maximal pronation and supination. CONCLUSION: The SLE is a true ligament and provides forearm stability when it is stretched in pronation and supination.