Chairwork in schema therapy for patients with borderline personality disorder-A qualitative study of patients' perceptions.

Objective: Chairwork is one of the core experiential techniques of Schema Therapy (ST) which is used in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, little is known about how people with BPD experience chairwork. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of patients with BPD with chairwork in ST. Method: Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 29 participants with a primary diagnosis of BPD who experienced chairwork as part of their ST treatment. The interview data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Findings: Many participants reported initial skepticism, and difficulties with engaging in chairwork. Specific therapist behaviors as well as some external (e.g., restricted facilities, noise) and internal factors (especially feeling ashamed or ridiculous) were named as hindering factors. Participants described several therapist behaviors facilitating chairwork such as providing safety, clear guidance through the process as well as flexible application of the technique according to their needs, and sufficient time for debriefing. Participants experienced emotional pain and exhaustion as short-term effects of the technique. All participants reported positive long-term effects including an improved understanding of their mode model as well as positive mode changes (e.g., less Punitive Parent and more Healthy Adult Mode), greater self-acceptance, improvements in coping with emotions and needs as well as improvements in interpersonal relationships. Conclusions: Chairwork is experienced as an emotionally demanding but valuable technique. Based on the participants' statements, the delivery of chairwork can be optimized which can help to improve treatment outcome.

The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy Compared to Behavioral Activation for Severely Depressed Outpatients: A Single-Center Randomized Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent and disabling disorder. This study examines two psychotherapy methods for MDD, behavioral activation (BA), and metacognitive therapy (MCT), when applied as outpatient treatments to severely affected patients. METHODS: The study was conducted in a tertiary outpatient treatment center. Patients with a primary diagnosis of MDD (N = 122) were included in the intention-to-treat sample (55.7% female, mean age 41.9 years). Participants received one individual and one group session weekly for 6 months (M). Assessments took place at baseline, pretreatment, mid-treatment (3 M), post-treatment (6 M), and follow-up (12 M). The primary outcome was depressive symptomatology assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 12 M follow-up. Secondary outcomes included general symptom severity, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. RESULTS: Linear mixed models indicated a change in depressive symptoms (F(2, 83.495) = 12.253, p < 0.001) but no between-group effect (F(1, 97.352) = 0.183, p = 0.670). Within-group effect sizes were medium for MCT (post-treatment: d = 0.610; follow-up: d = 0.692) and small to medium for BA (post-treatment: d = 0.636, follow-up: d = 0.326). In secondary outcomes, there were improvements (p ≤ 0.040) with medium to large within-group effect sizes (d ≥ 0.501) but no between-group effects (p ≥ 0.304). Response and remission rates did not differ between conditions at follow-up (response MCT: 12.9%, BA: 13.3%, remission MCT: 9.7%, BA: 10.0%). The deterioration rate was lower in MCT than in BA (χ21 = 5.466, p = 0.019, NTT = 7.4). DISCUSSION: Both MCT and BA showed symptom reductions. Remission and response rates were lower than in previous studies, highlighting the need for further improvements in adapting/implementing treatments for severely affected patients with MDD.

The societal cost of treatment-seeking patients with borderline personality disorder in Germany.

According to previous research, borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with high cost-of-illness. However, there is still a shortage of cost-of-illness-studies assessing costs from a broad societal perspective, including direct and indirect costs. Further, there are considerable differences in the results among the existing studies. In the present study, 167 German men and women seeking specialized outpatient treatment for BPD were included. We assessed societal cost-of-illness bottom-up through structured face-to-face interviews and encompassed a wide range of cost components. All costs were calculated for the 2015 price level. Cost-of-illness amounted to € 31,130 per patient and year preceding disorder-specific outpatient treatment. € 17,044 (54.8%) were direct costs that were mostly related to hospital treatment. Indirect costs amounted to € 14,086 (45.2%). Within indirect costs, costs related to work disability were the most crucial cost driver. The present study underlines the tremendous economic burden of BPD. According to the present study, both the direct and indirect costs are of significant importance for the societal costs associated with BPD. Besides the need for more disorder-specific treatment facilities for men and women with BPD, we assume that education and employment are topics that should be specifically targeted and individually supported at an early stage of treatment.Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Registration, DRKS00011534, Date of Registration: 11/01/2017, retrospectively registered.

How patients with borderline personality disorder experience the skill opposite action in the context of dialectical behavior therapy-A qualitative study.

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is currently the most researched therapy method to treat borderline personality disorder (BPD). A major component of DBT is learning and practicing specific skills to regulate emotions. Qualitative studies found that patients perceived DBT skills as helpful in dealing with emotions. However, DBT consists of more than 60 different skills, and earlier qualitative studies had a broad focus. The present study explores patients' experience with a specific skill, opposite action (OA). The skill is one of the major DBT skills assumed to play an important role in symptom improvement. OA means deliberately performing a behavior that is opposite to the emotional urge to act and is intended to weaken the original emotion. Qualitative data from semistructured interviews with 23 patients diagnosed with BPD receiving DBT were analyzed following qualitative content analysis procedures. The participants generally had a good understanding of the skill, although it was often mixed with other skills of DBT. Performing OA was perceived as exhausting. Adverse effects of OA, intense emotions and high distress were reported as barriers to OA use. However, participants named several factors that helped them overcome these barriers, including their thoughts and actions, support from others, and treatment elements. Participants described positive effects of OA such as positive emotional changes and a decrease in problem behavior and more freedom in everyday life. The findings of the study provide valuable information to optimize the delivery of OA and DBT and can help to improve treatment outcome for patients with BPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The mediating effect of difficulties in emotion regulation on the association between childhood maltreatment and borderline personality disorder.

Background: Childhood maltreatment and difficulties in emotion regulation are common in patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Depressive Disorders (DD). Objective: This study examines differences between patients with BPD and patients with DD, regarding childhood maltreatment and difficulties in emotion regulation as well as the mediating effect of different aspects of emotion regulation deficits on the association between childhood maltreatment and BPD-symptoms. Method: A total of 305 participants, 177 with BPD and 128 with DD completed an assessment including the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), the Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Data was analyzed using multiple analyses of variances and mediation analyses. Results: Patients with BPD reported more childhood maltreatment and more difficulties in emotion regulation than patients with DD. When general symptom severity, age, and gender were included in the analysis as covariates only group differences regarding 'impulse control difficulties' (F(1,299) = 38.97, p < .001, ηp2 = .115), 'limited access to emotion regulation strategies' (F(1,299) = 4.66, p = .032, ηp2 = .015), and 'lack of emotional clarity' (F(1,299) = 9.38, p = .002, ηp2 = .030) remained statistically significant. A mediation analysis, including above-mentioned covariates, indicated an association between emotional abuse and BPD-symptoms, which was mediated by difficulties in emotion regulation (indirect effect B = .012, 95% CI [.001; .031], R2 = .429). Subscale analyses revealed 'impulse control difficulties' as the aspect of difficulties in emotion regulation that has the greatest impact on this association (B = .021, 95% CI [.003; .045]). Conclusions: Patients with BPD display more childhood maltreatment and difficulties in emotion regulation than patients with DD. Difficulties in emotion regulation, especially difficulties in impulse control, seem to play an important role in the association between childhood emotional abuse and BPD-symptoms.

Antecedentes: El maltrato infantil y las dificultades en la regulación emocional son frecuentesw en pacientes con trastorno límite de personalidad (TLP) y pacientes con trastornos depresivos (TD).Objetivo: Este estudio examina las diferencias entre pacientes con TLP y pacientes con TD, en cuanto al maltrato infantil y las dificultades en la regulación de las emociones, así como el efecto mediador de diferentes aspectos de los déficits en la regulación de las emociones sobre la asociación entre el maltrato infantil y los síntomas del TLP.Método: Un total de 305 participantes, 177 pacientes con TLP y 128 pacientes con TD completaron una evaluación que incluyó el Cuestionario de Trauma Infantil (CTQ), la Escala de Regulación de las Emociones (DERS), el Inventario Breve de Síntomas (BSI) y la Entrevista Clínica Estructurada para DSM-IV (SCID). Los datos se analizaron mediante múltiples análisis de variaciones y análisis de mediación.Resultados: Los pacientes con TLP informaron más maltrato infantil y más dificultades en la regulación de las emociones que los pacientes con TD. Cuando la gravedad de los síntomas generales, la edad y el sexo se incluyeron en el análisis como covariables, solo las diferencias de grupo con respecto a las 'dificultades de control de impulsos' (F (1.299) = 38,97, p <.001, ηp2 = .115), 'acceso limitado a estrategias de regulación de las emociones '(F (1,299) = 4.66, p = .032, ηp2 = .015) y' falta de claridad emocional '(F (1,299) = 9.38, p = .002, ηp2 = .030) permanecieron estadísticamente significativas. Un análisis de mediación, incluidas las covariables antes mencionadas, indicó una asociación entre el abuso emocional y los síntomas del TLP, que fue mediada por dificultades en la regulación de las emociones (efecto indirecto B = .012, IC del 95% [.001; .031], R2 =. 429). Los análisis de subescalas revelaron "dificultades de control de impulsos" como el aspecto de las dificultades en la regulación de las emociones que tiene el mayor impacto en esta asociación (B = .021, IC del 95% [.003; .045]).Conclusiones: Los pacientes con TLP presentan más maltrato infantil y dificultades en la regulación de las emociones que los pacientes con TD. Las dificultades en la regulación de las emociones, especialmente las dificultades en el control de los impulsos, parecen jugar un papel importante en la asociación entre el abuso emocional infantil y los síntomas del TLP.

Differential Effects of Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders on Treatment Outcome in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder from Childhood Trauma.

Patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) frequently have comorbid diagnoses such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders (AD). Studies into the impact of these comorbidities on the outcome of PTSD treatment have yielded mixed results. The different treatments investigated in these studies might explain the varied outcome. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of these comorbidities on the outcome of two specific PTSD treatments. MDD and AD were analyzed as predictors and moderators in a trial comparing 12 sessions of either eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) or imagery rescripting (IR) in 155 adult patients with PTSD from childhood trauma. The primary outcome was reduction of PTSD symptoms (clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5, CAPS-5) assessed at eight-week follow-up and a secondary outcome was self-report PTSD symptoms (Impact of Event Scale, IES-R). MDD was not a predictor of treatment outcome but did have a significant moderator effect. Patients with MDD showed a better outcome if they were treated with IR, whereas patients without MDD improved more in the EMDR condition. No impact of AD emerged. It seems essential to consider comorbid MDD when planning PTSD treatment to improve treatment outcomes. More research is needed to replicate our findings and focus on different kinds of PTSD treatments and other comorbidities.

How do patients with borderline personality disorder experience Distress Tolerance Skills in the context of dialectical behavioral therapy?-A qualitative study.

Distress Tolerance Skills (DTS) are an important component of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT), a therapy method frequently used for treating patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). However, little is known about how DTS-training is experienced by individuals with BPD. The aim of this study was to explore BPD patients' experiences with receiving DTS-training. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 24 individuals (87.5% females) with a primary diagnosis of BPD who received DTS-training in the context of 18 months of DBT treatment. Interview data were analyzed following the procedures of qualitative content analysis. Participants reported various effects of DTS including an immediate reduction of tension. Patients perceived DTS as a tool to cope with difficult interpersonal situations and emergencies and stated that this helped them to feel stable, safe and self-confident. Patients reported difficulties during the initial engagement, the learning process and the application of DTS as well as various facilitating factors. Implications of the findings for further research and for optimizing DTS-training in clinical practice are discussed.

Experiences of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder With Imagery Rescripting in the Context of Schema Therapy-A Qualitative Study.

Imagery Rescripting (IR) is a therapeutic technique that is used in a wide spectrum of therapeutic methods for various mental disorders. As an important component of Schema Therapy (ST), IR is frequently used in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, little is known about how IR is experienced by individuals with BPD. The aim of this study was to explore BPD patients' experiences with receiving IR. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 21 individuals (86% females) with a primary diagnosis of BPD who received IR within their ST treatment. Interview data were analyzed following the procedures of qualitative content analysis. Participants reported various effects of IR including initial high emotionality and exhaustion. Long-term effects included a better understanding of schemas and an improvement regarding emotion regulation and interpersonal relationships. Participants reported factors hindering the successful implementation of IR, such as external noise, stress, and a fast pace during IR. Facilitating factors included adequate time for debriefing, a transparent structure, and preparation of IR as well as the therapist providing safety. Implications of the findings for optimizing IR in clinical practice are discussed.

Therapeutic Relationship in eHealth-A Pilot Study of Similarities and Differences between the Online Program Priovi and Therapists Treating Borderline Personality Disorder.

eHealth programs have been found to be effective in treating many psychological conditions. Regarding Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), few programs have been tested; nevertheless, results are promising. The therapeutic alliance is an important factor predicting treatment outcome in BPD. However, we do not know yet to what extent BPD patients form a therapeutic alliance with an eHealth tool and how this relationship differs from the relationship with their human therapist. This study aims to address this question using priovi, an interactive schema therapy-based eHealth tool for BPD. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore how patients perceived the therapeutic alliance with priovi and its differences compared to the alliance with their human therapist (N = 9). Interview data were analyzed following the procedures of qualitative content analysis. Additionally, the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SR) was administered in two versions (regarding the human therapist and priovi, N = 16) every three months during the treatment phase of one year. Results indicate that patients were able to form a good therapeutic relationship with priovi, but it differed from the relationship to their human therapist. Important categories were "priovi is helpful, supportive and always there" and "priovi is less flexible". WAI ratings for the task subscale were high in both relationships but significantly higher in WAItherapist compared to WAIpriovi in two measurements (nine-months measurement: t = 2.76, df = 15, p = 0.015; twelve-months measurement: t = 3.44, df = 15, p = 0.004). These results indicate that BPD patients can form a functioning alliance with an eHealth program and that eHealth programs may be especially useful for psychoeducation and cognitive exercises.

Combining baseline characteristics to disentangle response differences to disorder-specific versus supportive psychotherapy in patients with persistent depressive disorder.

Does the pre-treatment profile of individuals with persistent depressive disorder (PDD) moderate their benefit from disorder-specific Cognitive Behavioral System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) versus supportive psychotherapy (SP)? We investigated this question by analyzing data from a multi-center randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of 48 weeks of CBASP to SP in n  =  237 patients with early-onset PDD who were not taking antidepressant medication. We statistically developed an optimal composite moderator as a weighted combination of 13 preselected baseline variables and used it for identifying and characterizing subgroups for which CABSP may be preferable to SP or vice versa. We identified two distinct subgroups: 58.65% of the patients had a better treatment outcome with CBASP, while the remaining 41.35% had a better outcome with SP. At baseline, patients responding more favorably to CBASP were more severely depressed and more likely affected by moderate-to-severe childhood trauma including early emotional, physical, or sexual abuse, as well as emotional or physical neglect. In contrast, patients responding more favorably to SP had a higher pre-treatment global and social functioning level, a higher life quality and more often a recurrent illness pattern without complete remission between the episodes. These findings emphasize the relevance of considering pre-treatment characteristics when selecting between disorder-specific CBASP and SP for treating PDD. The practical implementation of this approach would advance personalized medicine for PDD by supporting mental health practitioners in their selection of the most effective psychotherapy for an individual patient.

A Schema Therapy-Based eHealth Program for Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (priovi): Naturalistic Single-Arm Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health (eHealth) programs have been found to be effective in treating many psychological conditions. However, regarding borderline personality disorder (BPD), only a few eHealth programs have been tested, involving small interventions based on the dialectical behavior therapy treatment approach. We investigated priovi, a program based on the schema therapy (ST) approach. priovi is considerably more comprehensive than prior programs, offering broad psychoeducation content and many therapeutic exercises. OBJECTIVE: We tested the acceptability and feasibility of priovi in 14 patients with BPD as an add-on to individual face-to-face ST. METHODS: Patients received weekly individual ST and used priovi over a period of 12 months. We assessed BPD symptom severity using self-reported and interview-based measures. Qualitative interviews were conducted with both patients and therapists to assess their experiences with priovi. RESULTS: BPD symptoms improved significantly (Cohen d=1.0). Overall, qualitative data showed that priovi was positively received by both patients and therapists. Some exercises provoked mild anxiety; however, no serious threat to safety was detected. CONCLUSIONS: priovi is a potentially helpful and safe tool that could support individual ST. It needs to be further tested in a randomized controlled study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00011538; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do? navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011538 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74jb0AgV8).

PRO*MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Major depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe mental disorder associated with considerable disability and high costs. Over the last decades, various psychotherapies for MDD have been developed and researched, among others Behavioral Activation (BA) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). MCT and BA target different maintaining factors of MDD and have not been compared to date. The PRO*MDD randomized controlled trial will compare MCT and BA in the routine clinical setting of an outpatient clinic. Methods and Design: We aim to recruit 128 MDD patients, who will be randomly assigned to either MCT or BA. In both conditions, patients will receive one individual therapy session and one group therapy session per week for a maximum of 6 months. Assessments will take place at baseline, pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment as well as at 12, 18, and 30 months after start of treatment as follow-up. The primary outcome is reduction of depression severity assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; secondary outcomes address quality of life, psychosocial functioning and participation as well as comorbidity. Discussion: The PRO*MDD study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of MCT and BA. The outcome of this trial will increase our knowledge on the effectiveness and applicability of both treatment modalities and therefore contribute to the improvement of treatment for depressive patients. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been reviewed and approved on 11 August 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Lübeck University (reference number: 16-176). The results will be discussed through peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00011536 (retrospectively registered).

PRO*BPD: effectiveness of outpatient treatment programs for borderline personality disorder: a comparison of Schema therapy and dialectical behavior therapy: study protocol for a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a severe mental illness that is associated with low quality of life, low psychosocial functioning, and high societal costs. Treatments for BPD have improved in the last decades. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) and Schema therapy (ST) have demonstrated efficacy in reducing BPD symptoms and costs. However, research has not compared these two treatment approaches. In addition, there is a lack of 'real world studies' that replicate positive findings in regular mental healthcare settings. Thus, the PROgrams for Borderline Personality Disorder (PRO*BPD) study will compare the (cost-) effectiveness of DBT and ST in structured outpatient treatment programs in the routine clinical setting of an outpatient clinic. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to recruit 160 BPD patients, who will be randomly assigned to either DBT or ST. In both conditions, patients receive one group therapy and one individual therapy session/week for a maximum of 18 months. Both treatment programs have similar frameworks, which guarantee clinical equipoise. The primary outcome is a reduction of BPD-symptoms. Also, the costs related to BPD are assessed and an economic evaluation is performed from a societal perspective. Secondary outcomes examine other measures of BPD-typical and general psychopathology, comorbidity, quality of life, psychosocial functioning and participation. Data are collected prior to the beginning therapy and every six months until the end of therapy, as well as at six months, one year and two years of follow-up after the end of therapy. Finally, we conduct a qualitative study to understand patients' experiences with the two methods. DISCUSSION: The PRO*BPD study is the first randomized trial to compare the (cost-) effectiveness of DBT and ST. By examining the clinical effectiveness of a broad spectrum of outcome parameters, conducting an economic evaluation and assessing patients' experiences, this study will significantly advance our knowledge on psychotherapy for BPD and will provide insight into the treatment approaches that should be offered to different BPD patients from clinical, economic and stakeholder's perspectives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS00011534 , Date of registration: 11/01/2017, retrospectively registered.

Moderating effect of comorbid anxiety disorders on treatment outcome in a randomized controlled psychotherapy trial in early-onset persistently depressed outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Persistent depressive disorder (PDD) is associated with high rates of comorbid psychiatric disorders, mostly anxiety disorders (ADs). Comorbid AD was found to be associated with poorer treatment outcome in PDD patients. The effect of comorbid AD on disorder-specific treatment for PDD (Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy [CBASP]) has not been studied yet. METHODS: We analyzed whether the presence of a comorbid AD was moderating the effectiveness of disorder-specific (CBASP) versus nonspecific psychotherapy (supportive therapy [SP]) on depressive symptoms (24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HRSD-24]) in a sample of unmedicated early-onset PDD outpatients (N = 268). Secondary outcomes were response and remission of depressive symptoms and the extent of interpersonal problems (Inventory of Interpersonal Problems [IIP-64]). RESULTS: The superiority of CBASP over SP was significantly stronger in PDD patients with comorbid AD compared to patients without AD (in HRSD-24 and IIP-64). There was no significant moderation for remission or response of depressive symptoms. DISCUSSION: Our hypothesis of a moderating effect of comorbid AD was confirmed. The main limitation might be the exclusion criteria of our sample limiting the generalizability. The major strength is the systematic analysis of the effect of AD in treating early-onset PDD with high quality of psychotherapy in both arms of this trial. CONCLUSION: Patients suffering from PDD comorbid with AD might experience greater benefit when they are treated with specific as opposed to unspecific therapy. Analyzing subgroups of patients with PDD seems worthwhile to improve treatment effectiveness even within disorder-specific treatment programms.