ABSTRACT
Background: We aimed to investigate the association of body mass index (BMI) with treatment response in patients with DLBCL. Material and Methods: Seventy-nine DLBCL subjects were included in this study. Data about patient age, sex, serum LDH level, presence of B symptoms, IPI score, ECOG performance score, disease stage, extranodal involvement, and BMI values at diagnosis were retrieved by retrospective patient record review. Patients were staged according to Ann Arbor classification using CT and/or PET/CT findings, and the presence of B symptoms. Body mass index was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared (kg/m2). Patients were divided into groups according to their BMI as underweight (BMI≤ 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI≥ 30 kg/m2), as defined by the World Health Organization. Results: Patients were divided into four groups according to their BMIs, but because there was only one patient in the underweight group, comparisons were performed between normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients. There was no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of age, sex, serum LDH level, disease stage, presence of B symptoms, extranodal involvement, ECOG performance score, IPI score and treatment response (p= 0.070, 0.704, 0.325, 0.464, 0.254, 0.152, 0.658, 0.620, and 0.947, respectively). Conclusion: In our study, we showed that BMI has no significant impact on treatment response in patients with DLBCL.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of adult lymphomas. The incidence of DLBCL increases with age and has a fairly rapid fatal course without treatment. Patients often have difficulty tolerating standard chemotherapy regimens due to their comorbidities. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), which is calculated by considering 19 different comorbidities, was developed in 1987 and is widely used for mortality prediction in cancer patients. Literature data on CCI and hematological malignancies are limited. Main aim in this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CCI and compare to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) scoring system in the DLBCL patient group. Methods: A total of 170 patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 1.1.2002- 1.12.2020 were included in the study. Statistical analyzes were performed among patients whose IPI and CCI scores were recorded by considering baseline data. Results: The median age of patients was 58 (range: 17-84). Thirty-five (20.6%) patients had stage III and 76 (44.7%) had stage IV disease. When the CCI, IPI and ECOG scores were compared with the mortality status of the patients as a reference, AUCs were resulted as 0.628 (95% CI: 0.506-0.749), 0.563 (95% CI: 0.484-0.639) and 0.672 (95% CI: 0.596-0.743), respectively. There was no significant difference between the ROC curves of CCI, IPI and ECOG scores. Patients with a CCI score of ≥ 4 had shorter OS comperad to those with a score of < 4. Conclusion: Rather than claiming that CCI is superior to IPI, ECOG or another scoring system in a single-center patient population, it should be stated that CCI is also an effective scoring system in patients diagnosed with DLBCL. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-022-01567-5.
