The effect of injury area on the success of treatment in digital nerve injury.

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of the current study is to investigate variations in postoperative outcomes that follow digital nerve repair in Zone 1 and Zone 2, respectively. We hope that by carrying out this investigation, we will be able to identify which zone has better sensation recovery and patient-reported outcomes, allowing us to identify the best way of conducting surgery for specific types of injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with digital nerve injuries treated in a designated hand surgery clinic between January 2021 and December 2023. The study was guided by ethical consideration, where all participants gave their informed consent. Surgical interventions involved primary repair, autograft/allograft nerve grafting, nonsurgical approaches, as well as conduit repair in which results were determined using objective measures and patient feedback. RESULTS: Direct repair emerged superior among injuries of Zone 1 and Zone 2 with high success rates and good patient-reported outcomes. In general, injuries in Zone 1 had better sensory recovery than injuries in Zone 2 and this was associated with higher levels of satisfaction. Comparisons using statistical methods confirmed that direct repair outperformed other modalities. CONCLUSION: More importantly, the comparison of this study shows that repairs in Zone 1 are more successful than those in Zone 2 revealing direct repair as a superior method for digital nerve injuries. The difference is crucial because it suggests that surgical efficiency may depend on where the injury is. This means that direct repair should be given priority over the two zones, although surgeons will need to watch out for challenges related to Zone 2 injuries and adjust their strategies accordingly to obtain the best patient outcomes possible.

The Use of Free Fibula Flap in Different Extremities and Our Clinical Results.

Background and objectives Plastic, orthopedic, otolaryngology, and oromaxillofacial surgery specialists rely on fibula grafts to solve reconstructive problems. The aim of this study is to discuss the use and results of vascular fibula flaps in the treatment of bone and soft tissue defects in various regions with different etiologies. Materials and methods In our clinic, we treated 32 patients with osteocutaneous fibular flaps due to bone and soft tissue defects of different etiologies and varying anatomical regions. In our study, age, gender, side, cause of injury, surgical technique, treatment results, and complications were evaluated for each patient. Results Of the 32 patients, 25 were male, and 7 were female. The average age is 37.2 (27-56). The mean bone defect size was 10.45 cm. Bone defect occurred in eight patients due to osteomyelitis, eleven patients due to gunshot wounds, nine patients due to pseudoarthrosis, and four patients due to a giant cell tumor. We applied osteocutaneous fibula flap in 27 patients and vascularized fibular flap in five patients. Bone union could not be achieved in four patients, and bone grafting was performed as a secondary surgery. Local infection occurred in five patients, and their treatment was completed with debridement and antibiotic administration. Wound complications occurred in three patients at the donor site, which were treated with debridement and skin grafting. The mean duration of radiological union was three months, and complete union was achieved in the seventh month. Conclusions We have shown in our case series that free vascularized fibula transfer has gained an important place in the field of skeletal reconstruction and is a reliable method for various bone reconstructions.

The initial analysis of pediatric fractures according to the AO/OTA fracture classification and mechanisms of injuries.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of pediatric fractures has been changing timely, in a multifactorial fashion. The aim of this study was to put forward a recent 5-year epidemiological analysis of pediatric fractures, according to the current AO/OTA fracture classification, in the current decade of action for road safety. METHODS: A total of 3261 pediatric patients who were diagnosed with at least one fracture related with orthopedics and traumatology in a level-one trauma center were included in this retrospective and epidemiological descriptive study. The patients were grouped according to their ages as follows; <2, 2-5.9, 6-9.9, and 10-17.9. The fractures were examined according to the AO/OTA classification. RESULTS: A total of 3396 fractures were present in 3261 patients. The mean age of the patients was 9.8±4.6 (1-17). The number of patients according to the age groups was as follows; 28 (0.008%), 735 (22.53%), 863 (26.47%), and 1635 (50.99%), respectively. The most frequent three fractures according to the AO/OTA fracture classification were; 23 (radius/ulna distal 22.9%), 13 (humerus distal, 13.3%), and 7 (hand/carpal, 12%). About 68.8% and 31.2% of the patients were treated non-surgically and surgically, respectively. Overall mortality rate was 0.1%. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first analysis of pediatric fractures according to the AO/OTA classification, over a 5-year period. As a future prospect, further multicentric epidemiological studies are warranted to constitute a sustainable action plan for the prevention of major traumas.

The epidemiology of adult fractures according to the AO/OTA fracture classification.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of adult fractures has been changing timely, in a multifactorial fashion. The aim of this study was to put forward a recent 5-year epidemiological analysis of adult fractures, according to the current AO/OTA fracture classification, in the current decade of action for road safety. METHODS: 5324 adult patients who were diagnosed with at least one fracture related with orthopedics and traumatology in a level-one trauma center were included in this retrospective, epidemiological descriptive study. The patients were grouped according to their ages as; 18-35, 36-55, 56-69, and ≥70. The fractures were examined according to the AO/OTA classification. RESULTS: 5865 fractures were present in 5324 patients. The mean age of the patients was 48.6±21.5. The number of patients according to the age groups was as follows; 1947 (36.6%), 1636 (30.7%), 881 (16.5%), and 860 (16.2%), respectively. The most frequent three fractures according to the AO/OTA fracture classification were; 7 (hand 19.6%), 23 (distal forearm, 12.1%), and 8 (foot, 11.8%). About 54.4% and 45.4% of the patients were treated non-surgically and surgically, respectively. About 0.2% of the patients preferred an alternative treatment. Overall mortality rate was 0.4%. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first analysis of adult fractures according to the AO/OTA classification, over a 5-year period. As a future prospect, further multi-centric epidemiological studies are warranted to constitute a sustainable action plan for the prevention of major traumas.