A phase I study of AZD2171 and Temsirolimus in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies.

PURPOSE: Temsirolimus, a mTOR inhibitor, and AZD2171, a VEGFR inhibitor, have independently shown activity in patients with gynecological malignancies. Understanding the pivotal role of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway in regulating angiogenesis, a phase I study utilizing Temsirolimus and AZD2171 was initiated to study the safety of targeting the mTOR and VEGF pathway in patients with recurrent or refractory gynecological malignancies. METHODS: Patients with advanced gynecological cancers were enrolled in this phase 1 study with Temsirolimus and AZD2171. A traditional 3 + 3 design was followed. The primary objective was to determine the MTD of the combination. Secondary objectives included efficacy, progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity profile. An expansion phase was planned after the MTD was determined. RESULTS: The study enrolled 11 patients over 16 months. All patients were enrolled in dose level 1. Due to toxicity, the trial was halted at dose level 1. No MTD was determined. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities included hypertension, thrombocytopenia, thromboembolic events, and hypertriglyceridemia. Five patients were evaluable for best overall clinical response. The best overall clinical response was stable disease. Two patients died without documented progression of disease. The median PFS was 7.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a conservative dose escalation, the toxicity data demonstrated that the combination of AZD2171 and Temsirolimus was not tolerable. Increased awareness of novel toxicities, pharmacological interactions, coupled with strict patient selection and early mitigation of side effects may enhance phase I clinical trial development.

Phase 1 and 2 study of carboplatin and pralatrexate in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this phase 1 and 2 trial was to identify the appropriate dose of combined carboplatin and pralatrexate for patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS: In phase 1, patients received carboplatin (at an area under the curve of 5) and increasing doses of pralatrexate until the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of pralatrexate was achieved. The primary endpoint was the response rate. Additional endpoints were safety, response duration, progression-free survival, overall survival, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in phase 1, and 20 were enrolled in phase 2. Of all 50 patients, 49 completed the study. The mean patient age was 59 years, and patients completed a median of 6 cycles. The MTD for pralatrexate was 105 mg/m2 . The clinical benefit rate (complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease) was 86%. Of 26 patients who received the MTD, 12 had a partial response, 11 had stable disease, and 2 had disease progression. The progression-free survival rate at 3 and 6 months was 87% and 79%, respectively; and the overall survival rate was 98% at 6 and 12 months and 66% at 24 months. Of 30 patients, 18 (60%) in phase 1 experienced an adverse event of any grade; and, of those, 4 patients (13%) had a grade 3 or greater adverse event. In phase 2, 12 patients (60%) had an adverse event of any grade, and 4 (20%) had grade 3 or greater toxicity. There was a significant reduction in the total body clearance of pralatrexate when it was received concurrently with carboplatin. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients responded to carboplatin-pralatrexate combination. This regimen is well tolerated and effective in this patient population. Cancer 2016;122:3297-3306. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 mutation carrier ovarian cancer in the setting of PARP inhibitor resistance: a multi-institutional study.

PURPOSE: Preclinical data suggest that exposure to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) may compromise benefit to subsequent chemotherapy, particularly platinum-based regimens, in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation carrier ovarian cancer (PBMCOC), possibly through the acquisition of secondary BRCA1/2 mutations. The efficacy of chemotherapy in the PARPi-resistant setting was therefore investigated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of PBMCOC who received chemotherapy following disease progression on olaparib, administered at ≥200 mg twice daily for one month or more. Tumor samples were obtained in the post-olaparib setting where feasible and analyzed by massively parallel sequencing. RESULTS: Data were collected from 89 patients who received a median of 3 (range 1-11) lines of pre-olaparib chemotherapy. The overall objective response rate (ORR) to post-olaparib chemotherapy was 36% (24 of 67 patients) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and 45% (35 of 78) by RECIST and/or Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) CA125 criteria with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 17 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI), 13-21] and 34 weeks (95% CI, 26-42), respectively. For patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, ORRs were 40% (19 of 48) and 49% (26/53), respectively, with a median PFS of 22 weeks (95% CI, 15-29) and OS of 45 weeks (95% CI, 15-75). An increased platinum-to-platinum interval was associated with an increased OS and likelihood of response following post-olaparib platinum. No evidence of secondary BRCA1/2 mutation was detected in tumor samples of six PARPi-resistant patients [estimated frequency of such mutations adjusted for sample size: 0.125 (95%-CI: 0-0.375)]. CONCLUSIONS: Heavily pretreated PBMCOC who are PARPi-resistant retain the potential to respond to subsequent chemotherapy, including platinum-based agents. These data support the further development of PARPi in PBMCOC.

Sequential bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide for recurrent ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Test the safety and efficacy of sequentially blocking angiogenesis by adding oral cyclophosphamide to bevacizumab following cancer progression on bevacizumab in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligibility included ≤ 2 lines of treatment for recurrence and measurable cancer by RECIST 1.0. Patients received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks IV) and upon RECIST progression, oral cyclophosphamide (50mg orally daily) was added. Objectives included safety, toxicities, 3- and 6-month PFS rates, response rate, PFS, and OS. RESULTS: 20 patients were enrolled. Overall response rate was 10%, and 65% of patients had confirmed stable disease (SD). Thirteen of 20 patients received oral cyclophosphamide added to bevacizumab upon bevacizumab progression. Of these 13 patients, 1 patient subsequently achieved a PR (this patient had SD as best response during bevacizumab) and 3 patients had a confirmed SD. For all patients, median PFS was 8.41 months, 6 month PFS rate was 65%, duration of response (DOR) was 7.3 months, and median OS was 22.72 months. Median DOR for patients receiving both bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide was 8.4 months. Most toxicities were grades 1 and 2 and manageable. Grades 3 and grade 4 toxicities included 1 myocardial infarction, 1 gastrointestinal perforation (GIP), and 12/20 patients (60%) developed grade 3 HTN. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of oral cyclophosphamide to bevacizumab at the time of cancer progression on bevacizumab appears to have continued anti-cancer effects in a subgroup of patients and appears to be safe. Randomized trials testing combination versus sequential anti-angiogenic therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer are warranted.

Phase I trial of liposomal doxorubicin and ZD1839 in patients with refractory gynecological malignancies or metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has activity in both breast and ovarian cancer. Preclinical data noted that ZD1839 acts synergistically with chemotherapy. Given the lack of cross-resistance between these two agents, a phase I trial was initiated examining the safety and efficacy of the combination of liposomal doxorubicin and ZD1839 in patients with recurrent gynecologic or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined within the first two cycles of treatment. Escalating doses of liposomal doxorubicin were administered every 4 weeks with ZD1839. Pharmacokinetic analysis and correlative studies were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in this study: six in each cohort. One DLT (febrile neutropenia) was observed in cohort 2. Dose level 3 was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and an additional ten patients were accrued. Serious adverse events (SAEs) included one patient with mental status changes believed secondary to disease progression and two central nervous system (CNS) bleeds believed to be unrelated to the combination of study agents. Toxicities were generally mild except for skin and gastrointestinal toxicity. No cardiac toxicity was observed. The best response to therapy included four partial responses and 20 patients with stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal doxorubicin with ZD1839 is an active regimen but is associated with increased skin toxicity in patients with advanced breast and gynecologic cancer.

Phase II prospective study of paclitaxel and carboplatin in older patients with newly diagnosed Müllerian tumors.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the completion rate of 6 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy with no dose reductions in patients > or =70 years of age. METHODS: Phase II study of intravenous (IV) carboplatin Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) given to patients > or =70 years of age, had any stage Müllerian cancer, and an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-2. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled (median age of 82 years, range 75 to 86 years). Six of 12 completed 6 cycles of chemotherapy with no dose reductions. Three patients died on study precipitating study closure; one with refractory cancer following cycle 1, one of aspiration pneumonia after cycle 1, and one with sudden death on day 5 of cycle 6. Patients undergoing upfront debulking surgery tolerated chemotherapy better compared to patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicities included 2 patients with febile neutropenia (17%). > or =Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (8%), nausea (8%), constipation (8%), obstipation (8%), vomiting (8%), and hypoxia (8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective trial of standard carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in a heterogeneous population of elderly patients, chemotherapy was well tolerated by patients who underwent upfront debulking surgery, had a PS of 0-1, and had few comorbidities. Patients not undergoing upfront debulking surgery because of either advanced cancer or poor surgical risk had excess morbidity/mortality. Prospective studies to identify risk factors for toxicity prediction are needed.

Long-acting octreotide for the treatment and symptomatic relief of bowel obstruction in advanced ovarian cancer.

Symptoms of malignant bowel obstruction in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer lead to a poor quality of life. Sandostatin LAR Depot (LAR) is an intramuscular, monthly administered, long-acting form of octreotide. LAR's safety and utility were evaluated in a pilot study enrolling 15 advanced ovarian cancer patients with bowel dysfunction. Once safety with subcutaneous (SQ) octreotide was assessed, patients were given 30 mg LAR on Day 1 and octreotide SQ for 2 weeks. Of 13 evaluable patients, three patients had a major response to LAR treatment with reduction in bowel obstruction symptoms, two had a minor response, four had no response, and four had progressive symptoms. Three patients remained on LAR for more than 9 months. No significant toxicities were attributable to octreotide or LAR. Because three patients received nine or more monthly injections of LAR, possible direct antitumor effects of LAR or synergy with chemotherapy needs to be explored.

A pilot trial of TAC (paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and carboplatin) chemotherapy with filgastrim (r-metHuG-CSF) support followed by radiotherapy in patients with "high-risk" endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the toxicity, tolerability, and feasibility of delivering combination chemotherapy with subsequent radiation therapy to women with high-risk endometrial cancer and to evaluate the long-term bowel toxicity of this regimen. METHODS: The trial was approved by the Dana Farber/Partners Cancer Care (DFPCC) Institutional Review Board (IRB). Patients with stage 3 or stage 4 endometrial cancer or patients with high-risk histology and any stage disease were prospectively entered. Complete surgical staging and a normal gated blood pool scan were required prior to entry. Patients were treated with three cycles of paclitaxel (160 mg/m(2) ), doxorubicin (45 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 5) (TAC) all on day 1 of a 21-day schedule as an outpatient with G-CSF support. At the conclusion of chemotherapy, patients received radiation therapy (4500 cGy to the whole pelvis) commencing within 35 days of the last cycle of chemotherapy. Paraaortic radiation and/or vaginal brachytherapy were allowed at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist. RESULTS: Twenty patients were entered onto the trial from November 2000 through February 2003. Eighteen patients successfully completed the trial, and two patients came off trial during chemotherapy (both later completed planned radiation therapy). Patients were initially stage 1 (n = 3), stage 3 (n = 14), and stage 4 (n = 3). Papillary serous was the dominant histology with 13 patients. Chemotherapy was given on average within 32 days of surgery (range 11-63 days) and radiation was initiated on average within 14 weeks of surgery (range 10-18 weeks). Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with 57 total cycles delivered of a planned 60 cycles. Two patients required dose modification in two cycles (two patients in cycle 3 secondary to hematologic toxicity). No grade 3 or grade 4 neurotoxicity was reported. There were six episodes of grade 3 short-term toxicity with radiation therapy reported in a single patient. Late radiotherapy toxicity included bowel obstruction requiring laparotomy in two patients and grade 3 constipation in one patient. Late radiation toxicity data are still being collected as follow-up continues. CONCLUSIONS: The TAC chemotherapy regimen is well tolerated and three cycles were delivered successfully with G-CSF support without evidence of the neurotoxicity or cardiac toxicity reported with the cisplatin containing TAP regimen. Standard radiation was deliverable following TAC therapy without excessive toxicity. Further study of this regimen with subsequent radiation therapy is warranted in patients at risk for systemic and regional recurrence of their malignancy.

A phase II trial of weekly docetaxel in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal serous cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the activity and tolerability of weekly docetaxel in patients with platinum-resistant mullerian origin tumors. METHODS: Patients with persistent disease, or those recurring less than 6 months after receiving platinum-containing therapy, were eligible for this phase II study. Docetaxel was initially administered at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, with a cycle length of 28 days. This starting dose was subsequently reduced to 30 mg/m(2) due to toxicity. Dexamethasone prophylaxis was administered at a dose of 4 mg PO every 12 hours for 3 doses, starting 12 hours before each dose of docetaxel. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled, with a median age of 59 years. The majority of patients received a median of 3 prior regimens, with 45% of the study group having received 4 or more prior regimens. The overall response rate in 29 evaluable patients was 6.9%, with no complete responses. Seventeen percent of patients experienced stable disease. Dose reduction or delay was required in 10 of the first 22 patients enrolled, prompting a reduction in the starting dose to 30 mg/m(2). Hematologic toxicity was generally tolerable, and no patient experienced febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally grade 1 in nature, although a combination of multiple low grade toxicities occurring in an individual patient oftentimes mandated dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel demonstrated modest activity in a heavily pre-treated, platinum-resistant population. A starting docetaxel dose of 30 mg/m(2) would be reasonable for future studies exploring the utility of weekly dosing in less heavily pre-treated patients.

Phase I trial of escalating doses of topotecan in combination with a fixed dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in women with müllerian malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) interact with topoisomerase I and II (topo I and II), respectively, with schedule dependent, and potentially synergistic cytotoxicity. OBJECTIVES: Define dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan delivered by 72-h infusion administered immediately after Doxil delivered at a fixed dose (30 mg/m(2)) in a cohort of women with recurrent müllerian malignancies. METHODS: Topotecan dose was escalated from 0.5 mg/m(2)/day for 3 days in 0.2 mg/m(2)/day increments with treatment repeated every 21 days. Eligibility criteria required ECOG < or = 2 and no more than four prior lines of chemotherapy. No dose reductions were allowed in the first two cycles to allow evaluation of cutaneous toxicity. RESULTS: Between November 2000 and August 2002, 18 patients were enrolled. Median age 59 (40-71) years. Patients received a median 1 (1-6) cycles of chemotherapy, with 39 cycles of treatment delivered at DL 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 12 for response. At dose level 2, dose-limiting toxicity consisted of nausea and vomiting, mucositis, cutaneous toxicity, and neutropenia. There was no clinically significant cardiac toxicity. There were no radiologically confirmed partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: Doxil 30 mg/m(2) and topotecan 0.5 mg/m(2)/day by 72-h infusion (total dose 1.5 mg/m(2)), although a rational combination of cytotoxic therapies, have limited clinical activity.