Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr ; 30(6): 541-551, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28314622

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about baseline diastolic dysfunction and changes in diastolic dysfunction grade after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) and its impact on overall outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe baseline diastolic dysfunction and changes in diastolic dysfunction grade that occur with TAVR and their relationship to mortality and rehospitalization. METHODS: This was a single-center study evaluating all TAVRs from January 2012 to June 2014. We compared parameters of diastolic dysfunction grade on pre-TAVR and 1 month post-TAVR echocardiograms for all patients undergoing the procedure. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis, and multivariate logistic regression were used. RESULTS: Of a sample size of 120 patients undergoing TAVR for symptomatic severe AS, 90 were included in the final analysis after excluding significant mitral valve disease. There were improvements in individual parameters of diastolic dysfunction grade such as lateral e' velocity, E/lateral e', and left atrial volume index (nonsignificant trend) in the setting of improvement in aortic valve area and gradients and functional class pre- and post-TAVR. Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline diastolic dysfunction grade, but not post-TAVR or changes in diastolic dysfunction grade, was associated with 1-year death (hazard ratio, 1.163; 95% CI, 1.049-1.277, P = .005) and combined death/cardiovascular hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.174; 95% CI, 1.032-1.318; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center retrospective study of patients with symptomatic severe AS who underwent TAVR, several diastolic function parameters improved on echocardiography, but baseline diastolic dysfunction grade remained the most important echocardiographic factor associated with adverse 1-year outcomes.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Stroke Volume , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/mortality , Adolescent , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Causality , Chicago/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/prevention & control
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 117(4): 633-639, 2016 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26721656

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of inhospital and post-discharge worsening renal function (WRF) on prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Severe chronic kidney disease and inhospital WRF are both associated with poor outcomes after TAVR. There are no data available on post-discharge WRF and outcomes. This was a single-center study evaluating all TAVR from June 1, 2008, to June 31, 2014. WRF was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dl. Inhospital WRF was measured from day 0 until discharge or day 7 if the hospitalization was >7 days. Post-discharge WRF was measured at 30 days after discharge. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis, and multivariate logistic regression were used. In a series of 208 patients who underwent TAVR, 204 with complete renal function data were used in the inhospital analysis and 168 who returned for the 30-day follow-up were used in the post-discharge analysis. Inhospital WRF was seen in 28%, whereas post-discharge WRF in 12%. Inhospital and post-discharge WRF were associated with lower rates of survival; however, after multivariate analysis, only post-discharge WRF remained a predictor of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.18, p = 0.030 for every 1 mg/dl increase in serum creatinine). In conclusion, the rate of inhospital WRF is higher than the rate of post-discharge WRF after TAVR, and post-discharge WRF is more predictive of mortality than inhospital WRF.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Creatinine/blood , Hospitalization , Kidney/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications , Renal Insufficiency/physiopathology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/blood , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Patient Discharge , Prognosis , Renal Insufficiency/blood , Renal Insufficiency/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors
3.
Circulation ; 132(13): 1243-51, 2015 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26286905

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the contemporary use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and other mechanical circulatory support (O-MCS) devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of cardiogenic shock. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 76 474 patients who underwent PCI in the setting of cardiogenic shock at one of 1429 National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI participating hospitals from 2009 to 2013. Temporal trends and hospital-level variation in the use of IABP and O-MCS were evaluated. No mechanical circulatory support was used in 41 286 (54%) patients, 29 730 (39%) received IABP only, 2711 (3.5%) received O-MCS only, and 2747 (3.6%) received both IABP and O-MCS. At the start of the study period, 45% of patients undergoing PCI in the setting of cardiogenic shock received an IABP and 6.7% received O-MCS. The proportion of patients receiving IABP declined at an average rate of 0.3% per quarter, whereas the rate of O-MCS use was unchanged over the study period. The predicted probability of IABP use varied significantly by site (hospital median 42%, interquartile range 33% to 51%, range 8% to 85%). The probability of O-MCS use was <5% for half of hospitals and >20% in less than one-tenth of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In this large national registry, the use of IABP in the setting of PCI for cardiogenic shock decreased over time without a concurrent increase in O-MCS use. The probability of IABP and O-MCS use varied across hospitals, and the use of O-MCS was clustered at a small number of hospitals.


Subject(s)
Assisted Circulation/statistics & numerical data , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Assisted Circulation/trends , Comorbidity , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/statistics & numerical data , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Societies, Medical , United States
4.
Surgery ; 148(4): 778-82; discussion 782-4, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20728194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Operative intervention plays an important role in the management of primary liver cancers in children. Recent improvements in diagnostic modalities, pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, and operative technique have all led to improved survival in these patients. Both hepatic resection and orthotopic liver transplantation are effective operations for pediatric liver tumors; which intervention is pursued is based on preoperative extent of disease. This is a review of our institution's experience with operative management of pediatric liver cancer over an 18-year period. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 1990 to 2007 identified patients who were ≤18 years old who underwent operative intervention for primary liver cancer. Demographics, type of operation, intraoperative details, pre- and postoperative management, as well as outcomes were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients underwent 57 operations for primary liver cancer, 30 of whom underwent resection; the remaining 27 underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. The mean age at diagnosis was 41 months. Twenty patients had stage 1 or 2 disease and 34 patients had stage 3 or 4 disease. Forty-eight (89%) patients received preoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 92% of patients. Mean overall and intensive care unit duration of stay were 18 and 6 days, respectively. About 45% of patients had a postoperative complication, including hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 8), line sepsis (n = 6), mild acute rejection (n = 3), biliary stricture (n = 2), pneumothorax (n = 2), incarcerated omentum (n = 1), Horner's syndrome (n = 1), and urosepsis (n = 1). Only 6 patients had a recurrence of their cancer, 5 after liver resection, 3 of whom later received a transplant. There was only 1 recurrence after liver transplantation. There was 1 perioperative mortality from cardiac arrest. Overall survival was 93%. CONCLUSION: Operative intervention plays a critical role in the management of primary liver cancer in the pediatric population. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be given if the tumor seems unresectable at diagnosis. If chemotherapy is unable to sufficiently downstage the tumor, orthotopic liver transplantation becomes the patient's best option. Our institution has had considerable experience with both resection and liver transplantation in the treatment of pediatric primary liver cancer, with good long-term outcomes.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Hepatectomy , Hepatoblastoma/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Transplantation , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Child , Child, Preschool , Hepatoblastoma/drug therapy , Hepatoblastoma/pathology , Humans , Infant , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Pediatr Surg ; 42(6): E1-3, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17560187

ABSTRACT

Esophageal atresia (EA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is a relatively common congenital condition in which there have been several described anatomical variants. The most common type, EA with distal TEF, comprises more than 75% of cases in many reports. Less commonly, a smaller proximal pouch fistula (H-type) will be associated with this most common variant in 1.4% of these cases. Only 2% of all cases of EA/TEF will have 2 large fistulas between the trachea and esophagus in which the end of the upper esophageal pouch connects terminally to the midtrachea and the distal esophagus arises from the trachea near the carina. Here we describe the management of an infant with this type of EA/TEF who was also found to have an H-type TEF of the proximal trachea. The combination of this type of EA/TEF with an associated H-type TEF or "triple fistula" has been previously described in the literature in only 1 other patient.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Atresia/surgery , Thoracotomy , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/surgery , Bronchoscopy , Case Management , Catheterization , Dilatation , Enteral Nutrition , Esophageal Atresia/complications , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Esophageal Stenosis/therapy , Esophagoscopy , Fundoplication , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastrostomy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intubation, Gastrointestinal , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/classification , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/complications , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...