Pharmacological and Endoscopic Interventions for Prophylaxis of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Background: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) represents the most common serious complication after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pancreatic duct stenting (PDS) are the prophylactic interventions with more evidence and efficacy; however, PEP still represents a significant source of morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Chronic statin use has been proposed as a prophylactic method that could be cheap and relatively safe. However, the evidence is conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic and pharmacological interventions including chronic statin and aspirin use, on the development of PEP. Methods: A retrospective cohort study evaluated consecutive patients undergoing ERCP at John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County in Chicago from January 2015 to March 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression. Results: A total of 681 ERCPs were included in the study. Twelve (1.76%) developed PEP. Univariate, multivariate, and subgroup analyses did not show any association between chronic statin or aspirin use and PEP. PDS and rectal indomethacin were protective in patients undergoing pancreatic duct injection. Pancreatic duct injection, female sex, and younger age were associated with a higher risk. History of papillotomy was associated with lower risk only in the univariate analysis (all P values < 0.05). Conclusion: Chronic use of statins and aspirin appears to add no additional benefit to prevent ERCP pancreatitis. Rectal NSAIDs, and PDS after appropriate patient selection continue to be the main prophylactic measures. The lower incidence at our center compared with the reported data can be explained by the high rates of rectal indomethacin and PDS, the use of noninvasive diagnostic modalities for patient selection, and the expertise of the endoscopists.

Predictors of poor bowel preparations and colonoscopy cancellations in inpatient colonoscopies, a single center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: An adequate bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy is a major quality-limiting factor that determines both the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of a colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for colon cancer screening and it is the primary approach to the workup of hematochezia, diarrhea and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Several modifiable factors of bowel prep adequacy have been identified, that account for around 25% of inadequate bowel preparations in outpatient colonoscopies. However, the literature is sparse when examining the factors associated with inadequate preparations and procedure cancellations in an inpatient hospital setting. We aim to identify factors that affect bowel preparation adequacy and procedure cancellations among diagnostic colonoscopies performed during hospitalization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of 1,500 consecutive patients who had a diagnostic colonoscopy as an inpatient at a tertiary level hospital over a 2-year period. All patients were administered a clear liquid diet the day prior to the colonoscopy. Patients were then instructed to drink 4 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG, Golytely) between 5 am to 9 am on the day of the procedure. The clinical course of each case was followed to identify quality of preparations, cancelled procedures and the reasons for cancellations. We applied univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify variables to predict cancellation and poor preparation. RESULTS: A total of 1,029 patients were included in the study. 194 (18.8%) patients had colonoscopy cancellations and 268 (26.0%) had poor bowel preparations. Multivariate analysis revealed these factors to be associated with colonoscopy cancellations: education at the graduate school level [odds ratio (OR) =1.93, P=0.04], Hispanic ethnicity (OR =0.47, P<0.01), hemoglobin level <10 g/dL (OR =1.41, P=0.05) and if the colonoscopy was done for other indications (OR =0.53, P=0.04). Factors associated with poor bowel preparation on multivariate analysis, were dementia (OR =2.44, P=0.02), gastroparesis (OR =3.97, P=0.01) and inpatient opioids use (OR =1.69, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of colonoscopy cancellations and poor bowel preparations in inpatient colonoscopies were high, and we were able to identify predictors of inadequate colon preparation and procedure cancellations. Exploring more individualized colon preparation regimens based on personal risk factors could reduce the number of inadequate and cancelled colonoscopies in an inpatient setting.

The Cook Score: A Novel Assessment for the Prediction of Liver-Associated Clinical Events in a Diverse Population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transient elastography (TE) provides accurate quantification of liver fibrosis. Its usefulness could be significantly amplified in terms of predicting liver-associated clinical events (LACE). Our aim was to create a model that accurately predicts LACE by combining the information provided by TE with other variables in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent liver elastography, at John H. Stroger Hospital in Cook County, Chicago, IL. The incidences of LACE were documented including decompensation of CLD, new hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-associated mortality. Significant predicting factors were identified through a forward stepwise Cox regression model. We used the beta-coefficients of these risk factors to construct the Cook Score for prediction of LACE. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for Cook Score to evaluate its efficiency in prediction, in comparison with MELD-Na Score and FIB-4 Score. RESULTS: A total of 3097 patients underwent liver elastography at our institution. Eighty-eight LACE were identified. Age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, p = 0.002), aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio (HR 2.61, p < 0.001), platelet count (HR 0.98, p < 0.001), international normalized ration (INR) (HR 17.80, p < 0.001), and liver stiffness measurement (HR1.04, p < 0.001) were identified as significant predictors. The Cook Score was constructed with two optimal cut-off points to stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups for LACE. The Cook Score proved superior than MELD-Na Score and FIB4 Score in predicting LACE with an area under curve of 0.828. CONCLUSION: This novel score based on a large robust sample would provide accurate prediction of prognosis in patients with chronic liver disease and guide individualized surveillance strategy once validated with future studies.

Acute pancreatitis in patients with COVID-19 is more severe and lethal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests an association between acute pancreatitis and COVID-19. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether COVID-19 affects the severity and outcomes associated with acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Cochrane guidelines and PRISMA statement were followed for this review. Digital dissertation bases were searched and all studies comparing the outcomes of acute pancreatitis amongst patients with and without COVID-19 were included. We compared the etiology, severity, length of hospital stay and mortality associated with acute pancreatitis in patients with and without COVID-19. RESULTS: Four observational studies with a total of 2,419 patients were included in the review. Presence of COVID-19 significantly increased the odds of mortality (OR 4.10, 95% CI 2.03-8.29) in patients with acute pancreatitis. These patients also had an increased incidence of severe pancreatitis (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.19-10.32), necrotizing pancreatitis (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.19-2.85) and a longer length of hospital stay (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.50-5.52), compared to non-COVID patients. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to have an unknown or idiopathic etiology of acute pancreatitis (OR 4.02, 95% CI 1.32-12.29), compared to non-COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that COVID-19 adversely impacts the morbidity and mortality associated with acute pancreatitis. SARS-CoV-2 may be a causative agent for acute pancreatitis. Further population-based studies are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Efficacy and safety of primary needle-knife fistulotomy in biliary cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of primary needle-knife fistulotomy (NFK) in biliary cannulation. An electronic bibliographic search of digital dissertation databases was performed from inception till March 2020. All prospective studies, including randomized trials evaluating the use of NFK as a primary cannulation technique in biliary cannulation, were analyzed. The primary outcome was a successful cannulation rate and the secondary outcomes were post-ERCP pancreatitis rate and overall post-ERCP complication rate. A total of four prospective studies, including three randomized trials, were included for the analysis. The pooled cannulation success rate for primary NFK was 95.7% (95% CI. 83.1-99.0, P < 0.001). When compared with standard wire-guided cannulation, the analysis did not show any difference between the two techniques in terms of cannulation success (OR, 3.59, 95% CI, 0.34-37.39; P = 0.28; low certainty of evidence). The overall rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis with primary NFK was 1.5 % (95% CI, 0.6-3.9, P < 0.001). When compared with conventional wire-guided technique, the odds of developing post-ERCP pancreatitis with NFK were 0.22 (95% CI, 0.04-1.04, P = 0.06; moderate certainty of evidence). To conclude, NKF seems to be an effective means of biliary cannulation in expert hands. Although it may be associated with a lower rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis, the current strength and quality of evidence to support its use as a primary cannulation strategy is low. It may be considered in ERCPs at higher risk of pancreatitis by experienced endoscopists.

Prophylactic Antibiotics Do Not Prevent Infectious Complications of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cysts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Despite limited evidence, endoscopic societies recommend routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis for endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions. Recent studies suggest lack of benefit in this setting. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of antibiotics in prevention of infectious complications after ultrasound fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions. A bibliographic search of digital dissertation databases was performed from inception until March 2020. Randomized controlled trials, cohort, and case-control studies that compared prophylactic antibiotics with placebo or no therapy were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the development of cyst infections. Secondary outcomes were incidence of fever; procedural complications such as bile leak, pancreatitis, or bleeding; and medication-related adverse events. Six studies with a total of 1683 patients were included. The overall incidence of cyst infections was 0.53%. For the primary outcome, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-1.82; P = 0.32). No significant difference was noted regarding other complications like fever, pancreatitis, or bile leak. In conclusion, the rate of infectious complications is very low, and antibiotic prophylaxis does not seem to confer any additional benefit in their prevention.

Identifying predictors and evaluating the role of steroids in the prevention of post-embolization syndrome after transarterial chemoembolization and bland embolization.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and bland embolization (TAE), performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), are often complicated by post-embolization syndrome (PES). There are limited data regarding the incidence of PES after TAE and the role of steroids in PES. We report the incidence of PES post TACE and TAE, identify predictors, and evaluate the role of steroids in PES. METHODS: Demographic and clinical variables of patients who underwent embolization were collected and PES was identified. Risk factors for PES, TACE and TAE were derived by logistic regression. We compared patients who received dexamethasone to those who did not, regarding baseline characteristics, occurrence of PES, and hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients, average age 60.5 years, underwent the procedure, 77.8% were male, and 87.7% had cirrhosis. Of these 171, 107 underwent TACE and 64 TAE. Dexamethasone was given to 106 (61.9%) patients, of whom 85 had TACE and 21 TAE. One hundred twenty-four patients (72.5%) developed PES. PES occurred in more patients who underwent TACE, 80 (74.7%) vs. 44 (68.7%), and resulted in a longer hospital stay (1.47 vs. 1.12 days, P=0.034). Predictive factors for PES included female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-7.34; P=0.041), and alcohol-related HCC (OR 3.14, 95%CI 1.42-6.95; P=0.005). Dexamethasone did not affect the length of hospital stay (1.43 vs. 1.29 days, P=0.422) or the rate of prolonged hospitalization (18.8% vs. 15.4%, P=0.561). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence of PES following TACE or TAE and the use of dexamethasone did not reduce the incidence of PES or the duration of hospital stay.

MELD-Na Is More Strongly Associated with Risk of Infection and Outcomes Than Other Characteristics of Patients with Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The nature and outcomes of infection among patients with cirrhosis in safety-net hospitals are not well described. We aimed to characterize the rate of and risk factors for infection, both present on admission and nosocomial, in this unique population. We hypothesized that infections would be associated with adverse outcomes such as short-term mortality. METHODS: We used descriptive statistics to characterize infections within a retrospective cohort characterized previously. We used multivariable logistic regression models to assess potential risk factors for infection and associations with key outcomes such as short-term mortality and length of stay. RESULTS: The study cohort of 1112 patients included 33% women with a mean age of 56 ± 10 years. Infections were common (20%), with respiratory and urinary tract infections the most frequent. We did not observe a difference in the incidence of infection on admission based on patient demographic factors such as race/ethnicity or estimated household income. Infections on admission were associated with greater short-term mortality (12% vs 4% in-hospital and 14% vs 7% 30-day), longer length of stay (6 vs 3 days), intensive care unit admission (28% vs 18%), and acute-on-chronic liver failure (10% vs 2%) (p < 0.01 for all). Nosocomial infections were relatively uncommon (4%), but more frequent among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Antibiotic resistance was common (38%), but not associated with negative outcomes. CONCLUSION: We did not identify demographic risk factors for infection, but did confirm its morbid effect among patients with cirrhosis in safety-net hospitals.

Non-hepatic Cancers Independently Predict Liver Decompensation Events.

BACKGROUND: Advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis represent independent risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is also evidence suggesting that several etiologies of chronic liver disease elevate the risk for non-hepatic cancers, including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcohol abuse, and hepatitis C infection. In the present study, we aim to characterize the cancer incidence in patients with chronic liver disease and assess the prognostic value of non-hepatic cancer on the decompensation events of this population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent transient elastography (TE) of liver, at John H. Stroger Hospital in Cook County, Chicago, IL. We identified patients who had decompensation of cirrhosis. We also extracted their cancer history. The cancer profiles of the cohort were compared by the presence or absence of advanced liver fibrosis. We then performed univariate and multivariate forward stepwise Cox regression analysis to identify the significant risk factors for the decompensation events and plotted Kaplan-Meier curve to demonstrate the significance of cancer in the prediction of decompensation events. RESULTS: We identified a total of 3097 patients who underwent TE. A total of 45 liver decompensation events were documented. In the univariate Cox regression model, MELD-Na score (hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, p < 0.001), liver stiffness measurement (HR 1.05, p = 0.004), and history of any cancer (HR 3.81, p = 0.001) emerged as predictors of decompensation. Non-hepatic cancer proved to be a significant predictor of decompensation (HR 3.57, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The present study represents the first attempt to the best of our knowledge to describe the cancer incidence in this high-risk population. We found that non-HCC cancers independently predict hepatic decompensation events, which is an intriguing finding. We propose that physicians should be more vigilant to cancer history of patients with chronic liver disease as it might provide valuable prognostic information and guide individualized treatment and surveillance plans.

A delay in colonoscopy after positive fecal tests leads to higher incidence of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A delay in performing colonoscopies after positive fecal tests in a screening program may risk neoplastic progression. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of timing of a colonoscopy after a positive fecal test on the detection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: Cochrane guidelines and PRISMA statement were followed for this review. Digital dissertation databases were searched from inception to June 1, 2020, and all studies reporting the detection rates of colorectal cancer on the basis of different time intervals between a positive fecal test and the post-test colonoscopy were included. We compared the detection rates of colorectal cancer (overall and advanced-stage) and advanced adenoma based on different time intervals. RESULTS: A total of 361 637 patients from six observational studies were included for the analysis. The odds of detecting any colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-2.03, P < 0.001), advanced-stage colorectal cancer (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.47-3.16, P < 0.001), or advanced adenomas (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.28, P = 0.001) are significantly higher if the colonoscopies are performed after 6 months from a positive fecal test, compared with within 6 months. There was no significant difference in the detection rates based on a 1-month, a 2-month, or a 3-month cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: A delay of colonoscopies beyond 6 months after positive fecal tests is associated with a higher odds of detecting colorectal cancer. A timely follow up of patients with positive fecal tests is warranted.