Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patient Experience: A Survey of Patient-Reported Symptoms by Irritable Bowel Syndrome Subtype and Impact on Quality of Life.

Objectives: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic, debilitating, functional gastrointestinal disorder with symptoms of abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel behaviours of constipation (IBS-C), diarrhea (IBS-D), or a mixture of both (IBS-M). There is limited information published on the impact of symptoms on everyday life in the Canadian population. Methods: An online survey was conducted with individuals diagnosed with IBS to capture the severity and frequency of patient-reported symptoms, including impact on productivity, quality of life, healthcare utilization, treatment access, and corresponding symptom relief. Responses from the three subtypes of IBS were categorized to illustrate differences among these. Results: There were 2,470 qualified respondents (filtered from 2,981, which included nonspecific IBS). IBS-M was the most common subtype, at 44 percent. Most individuals from all three IBS subtypes reported experiencing moderate to severe abdominal pain (63-70 percent) and bloating (59-75 percent) over the previous 3 months. Persons living with IBS-C reported severe bloating (32 percent), straining (72 percent), and tenesmus (78 percent) whereas those with IBS-D experienced severe urgency (63 percent) and incontinence (29 percent). Symptoms interfered in daily life, sometimes in 46 percent and often in 23 percent of respondents. Patients reported mood and anxiety disorders as common comorbidities with IBS (mood disorders: 30-34 percent; anxiety disorders: 25-30 percent). Conclusions: This study focuses on the differences among the IBS subtypes. IBS impacts productivity and healthcare utilization, which requires further investigation on approaches to improve treatment. The frequency and severity of symptoms in IBS are high and only a few respondents reported that their symptoms are under control.

Improving care for patients with Clostridioides difficile infection: A clinical practice and healthcare systems perspective.

Introduction: Arriving at a C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis, treating patients and dealing with recurrences is not straightforward, but a comprehensive and well-rounded understanding of what is needed to improve patient care is lacking. This manuscript addresses the paucity of multidisciplinary perspectives that consider clinical practice related and healthcare system-related challenges to optimizing care delivery. Methods: We draw on narrative review, consultations with clinical experts and patient representatives, and a survey of 95 clinical and microbiology experts from the UK, France, Italy, Australia and Canada, adding novel multi-method evidence to the knowledge base. Results and discussion: We examine the patient pathway and variations in clinical practice and identify, synthesize insights on and discuss associated challenges. Examples of key challenges include the need to conduct multiple tests for a conclusive diagnosis, treatment side-effects, the cost of some antibiotics and barriers to access of fecal microbiota transplantation, difficulties in distinguishing recurrence from new infection, workforce capacity constraints to effective monitoring of patients on treatment and of recurrence, and ascertaining whether a patient has been cured. We also identify key opportunities and priorities for improving patient care that target both clinical practice and the wider healthcare system. While there is some variety across surveyed countries' healthcare systems, there is also strong agreement on some priorities. Key improvement actions seen as priorities by at least half of survey respondents in at least three of the five surveyed countries include: developing innovative products for both preventing (Canada, Australia, UK, Italy, and France) and treating (Canada, Australia, and Italy) recurrences; facilitating more multidisciplinary patient care (UK, Australia, and France); updating diagnosis and treatment guidelines (Australia, Canada, and UK); and educating and supporting professionals in primary care (Italy, UK, Canada, and Australia) and those in secondary care who are not CDI experts (Italy, Australia, and France) on identifying symptoms and managing patients. Finally, we discuss key evidence gaps for a future research agenda.

Patient Experiences with Clostridioides difficile Infection: Results of a Canada-Wide Survey.

PURPOSE: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most prevalent cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea in Canada and is highly correlated with antibiotic use and contact with health care facilitates. The often-severe symptoms of CDI include diarrhea, dehydration, and abdominal pain. Patients often relapse following symptom resolution, resulting in increased morbidity. Previous research on the impact of CDI centered around the health-care system, clinician perspectives and economic burden, but not on patient experiences. The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of CDI on patients in Canada. METHODS: The Gastrointestinal Society conducted online surveys and gathered data from 167 qualifying participants, who were either patients or their non-treating caregivers. Quantitative parameters were analyzed by descriptive and comparative statistics and contextualized with qualitative insights derived from thematic analysis of open-ended questions. RESULTS: Our findings, which focused on clinical parameters such as prior exposure to health-care settings, antibiotic use, and patients' symptoms, mirrored findings from previous research. Interestingly, most surveyed respondents experienced delays in diagnosis and treatment; 29% waited 6-30 days and 10% over 30 days. This delayed diagnosis was further complicated by the report that 62% of respondents did not experience symptom resolution within 7 days of initiating treatment. Importantly, our results suggest a lasting impact after the resolution of CDI and we saw a reduction of self-assessed quality of life from prior to post CDI. Patients' priorities regarding their experience with CDI focused around concerns about the health-care system, particularly time to diagnosis and treatment, concerns about antibiotic usage and needs from health-care providers. CONCLUSION: This is the first Canadian report on patients' experience with CDI. Our data highlight the symptom-related impact on patients and the long-lasting effect on the quality of life including emotional impact. Reducing time to diagnosis and improving patient education are important priorities to attenuate the impact on patients.

Patient Perspectives on the Challenges and Responsibilities of Living With Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Collectively, chronic inflammatory diseases take a great toll on individuals and society in terms of participation restrictions, quality of life, and economic costs. Although prior qualitative studies have reported patients' experiences and challenges living with specific diseases, few have compared the consequences of disease management in daily life across different types of inflammatory diseases in studies led by patient partners. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the significant consequences of inflammatory arthritis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel diseases on daily life and explore commonalities across diseases. METHODS: A cross-sectional Web-based survey was designed by patient research partners and distributed by patient awareness organizations via their social media channels and by sharing a link in a newspaper story. One open-ended item asked about burdens and responsibilities experienced in daily life. Informed by narrative traditions in qualitative health research, we applied a thematic content analysis to participants' written accounts in response to this item. This is an example of a study conceived, conducted, and interpreted with patients as research partners. RESULTS: A total of 636 Canadians, with a median age band of 55-64 years, submitted surveys, and 80% of the respondents were women. Moreover, 540 participants provided written substantive responses to the open-ended item. Overall, 4 main narratives were generated: (1) daily life disrupted; (2) socioeconomic vulnerabilities; (3) stresses around visible, invisible, and hiding disabilities; and (4) actions aimed at staying positive. Ways in which participants experienced social stigma, pain and fatigue, balancing responsibilities, and worries about the future appeared throughout all 4 narratives. CONCLUSIONS: People living with chronic inflammatory diseases affecting joints, skin, and the digestive tract report important gaps between health, social, and economic support systems that create barriers to finding the services they need to sustain their health. Regardless of diagnosis, they report similar experiences navigating the consequences of lifelong conditions, which have implications for policy makers. There is a need for outcome measures in research and service delivery to address patient priorities and for programs to fill gaps created by the artificial administrative separation of health services, social services, and income assistance.

Pharmacare: Are we getting the right medicines?

Canada is the only country in the world with a national healthcare plan that does not include drug coverage. Coverage of necessary medications is a patchwork of inconsistent programs that does not always serve the very individuals it was created to help-those patients who need prescribed medicines. Our system needs radical, intuitive changes.