Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Early Interv Psychiatry ; 15(1): 34-40, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742904

ABSTRACT

AIM: Early Intervention in psychosis Services (EIS) have previously restricted access based on age. However, there is now a move to age inclusive service. We aimed to examine differences between early and late onset (>35 years) psychosis to see if a threshold was valid. We also investigated the potential of a statistical modelling method to identify group characteristics which may be missed using a descriptive approach. METHODS: Routine clinical data (n = 343), from an EIS, comprising socio-demographic, clinical, physical and treatment variables, were examined using descriptive and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS: The findings suggest that age differences were best explained by social factors. There was no emerging evidence that the differences exhibited had a fundamental impact on the clinical outcomes of the clients in terms of support beyond EIS (ie, hospitalization and home treatment team involvement) and pharmacological and psychological interventions. CART analysis revealed distinct service user characteristics associated with the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence to support a clinical cut off based on age providing support for age inclusive services. However, in the transition to age inclusive service delivery, EIS need to consider social/life stage variables, adapting provision where service delivery may operate a youth focused model. Routine analysis of clinical data should employ methods to identify groups of service users who may require adjusted service provision.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders , Adolescent , Early Intervention, Educational , Hospitalization , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/therapy
2.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 3(11): 1067-1078, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27528095

ABSTRACT

Art therapy enables individuals to use art to creatively express themselves and communicate differently with themselves, others, and their reality. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines for psychosis and schizophrenia suggest that arts therapies, which include art therapy, are considered to improve negative symptoms of psychosis. We examined the effectiveness of art therapy for people with psychosis and explored whether art therapy is a meaningful and acceptable intervention in this Review. Seven electronic databases were searched for empirical papers that concerned the use of art therapy for adults with psychosis that were published from 2007 onwards. The search identified 18 papers. High-quality quantitative articles provided inconclusive evidence for the effectiveness of art therapy in adults with psychosis. However, high-quality qualitative articles indicated that therapists and clients considered art therapy to be a beneficial, meaningful, and acceptable intervention, although this conclusion was based on a small number of studies. In this Review, we discuss the theoretical, clinical, and methodological issues in light of the development of more robust research, which is needed to corroborate individuals' experiences and guide evidence-based practice.


Subject(s)
Art Therapy , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL