Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Cognitive and Motor Functions in Parkinson's Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that presents with motor and non-motor manifestations. Amongst the non-motor features, various forms of sleep disturbances can occur, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is considered to be a common comorbidity. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of OSA on cognitive and motor functions in PD. METHODS: The information sources of for this systematic review and meta-analysis were PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Studies meeting the following criteria were included: (1) studies including idiopathic PD patients, (2) studies using polysomnography to categorize PD patients into PD with OSA and PD without OSA, and (3) studies with observational designs (case-control, cohort, or cross-sectional). Data analysis was performed using RevMan. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis showed that OSA was associated with significantly lower scores of Montreal Cognitive Assessments (MoCA) (mean difference (MD) = -0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-1.28, -0.13], P = 0.01) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (MD = -0.69, 95% CI [-1.17, -0.21], P = 0.005). Moreover, the score of the motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III) was significantly higher in PD patients with OSA as compared with those without OSA (MD = 1.63, 95% CI [0.03, 3.23], P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: OSA is associated with increased severity of PD-associated cognitive dysfunction and motor symptoms. However, further studies are needed to corroborate these findings, assess the underlying mechanisms by which OSA influences the motor and cognitive functions in PD, and investigate whether OSA can accelerate the neurodegenerative process of PD. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Comparative effect of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media on vascular attenuation, image quality, and heart rate changes in coronary CT angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) and low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) for vascular attenuation, image quality, heart rate changes, and common patient discomfort symptoms. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We included only randomized controlled trials. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were done by three independent authors. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine studies (n = 1831 participants) were found eligible and included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference between the both contrast media for vascular attenuation (mean difference = -21.31; 95% confidence interval -49.81 to 7.19; p = 0.14), image quality (standardized mean difference = 0.13; 95% confidence interval -0.07 to 0.33; p = 0.19), heart rate variability (standardized mean difference = -0.61; 95% confidence interval -1.30 to 0.09; p = 0.09), heat sensation (risk ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.11; p = 0.17), and nausea or vomiting (risk ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 1.28; p = 0.38). Moreover, IOCM resulted in a heart rate that was lower by 0.9 beat per minute (bpm) compared to LOCM (mean difference = -0.92; 95% confidence interval -1.81 to -0.03; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Both IOCM and LOCM have similar vascular enhancement, image quality, heart rate variability, and similar risk for patient discomfort. Furthermore, IOCM resulted in a slightly lower heart rate by 0.9 bpm.