ABSTRACT
Fibrillary glomerulonephritis (FGN) is a rare kidney disease typically affecting individuals in middle age, frequently presenting with advanced renal failure, proteinuria, and hypertension. FGN can be associated with autoimmune diseases, hepatitis C infection, and malignancies. Its exact pathogenesis remains elusive, and the exact role of DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9 is yet to be determined. On renal biopsy, FGN exhibits distinctive Congo-red-negative, nonbranching fibrils, approximately 20 nm in diameter. DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9 immunohistochemical staining has become a gold standard for diagnosis. Atypical variants exist, including congophilic, monotypic, and crescentic FGN, highlighting the disease's heterogeneity. Treatment with immunosuppression, including rituximab, has shown variable success, with no standard therapy established. FGN often leads to end-stage kidney disease, with a median progression time of 2-4 years postdiagnosis. Kidney transplantation is a viable option for FGN-related end-stage kidney disease, but recurrence in transplanted kidneys is not rare.
Subject(s)
Glomerulonephritis , Humans , Glomerulonephritis/therapy , Glomerulonephritis/diagnosis , Glomerulonephritis/pathology , Kidney Transplantation , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , BiopsyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite the data demonstrating an increased utilization of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic kidneys, the acceptance and incorporation of HCV-viremic kidneys are not universal. We aimed to identify regional differences and their temporal changes in the utilization of HCV-viremic kidneys. METHODS: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, HCV-viremic kidneys utilized in kidney transplants from March 15, 2019, to March 14, 2023, were included. The utilization of HCV-viremic kidneys across the United States and center-level clustering of HCV-viremic donor kidney transplants into HCV NAT-negative recipients (HCV D+/R- transplants) using Gini coefficients were examined. RESULTS: Significant regional variations were observed, with regions 3, 10, and 11 accounting for 51% of all HCV-viremic kidney utilization. Region 9 benefited the most from HCV-viremic kidney transplants with a high influx of kidney imports from other regions (284.9% gain). Region 8 and region 6 encountered the most substantial losses, with net losses of -44.2% and -41.1%, respectively. HCV D+/R- transplants were concentrated in specific high-volume centers, but trends indicated a gradual increase in a more equitable distribution across centers over time. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations can be observed in the utilization of HCV-viremic kidneys throughout the United States. These variations highlight opportunities for kidney transplant centers in specific regions to adopt policies for HCV-viremic kidney transplants, thereby expanding their donor pool. Encouragingly, an increasing number of kidney transplant centers are adopting HCV D+/R- kidney transplants, indicating positive progress. These trends suggest a more balanced access to HCV-viremic kidneys ahead.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C , Kidney Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Humans , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data , Hepacivirus , Viremia/epidemiologyABSTRACT
We report a case of adenovirus nephritis (ADVN) in a kidney transplant recipient (KTR) occurring within 8 days post-transplantation. The patient, a 35-year-old male, displayed systemic symptoms, high-grade fever, and acute kidney injury (AKI) without signs of hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). Extensive diagnostic workup revealed widespread necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in the allograft, leading to the identification of adenovirus (ADV) via histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. The source of ADV transmission remained uncertain, raising questions about the potential donor-derived infection. Unlike typical ADVN cases, the patient exhibited no hematuria or urinary symptoms. The case underscores the atypical presentation of ADVN in KTRs, challenging the conventional understanding of its timeline, transmission routes, and associated clinical features. We discuss the diagnostic challenges, histological findings, and management strategies for ADVN, emphasizing the importance of considering this entity in KTRs with unexplained fever and AKI, even in the absence of classical urinary symptoms or hematuria.
Subject(s)
Cystitis , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Male , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Adult , Cystitis/virology , Nephritis/virology , Adenoviridae Infections , Hemorrhage/etiology , Cystitis, HemorrhagicABSTRACT
Introduction: Postmarketing data on outcomes of avacopan use in antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) are lacking. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of 92 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing AAV who received therapy with avacopan. The coprimary outcome measures were clinical remission at 26 and 52 weeks. We use descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression to assess outcomes and predictors of remission, respectively. Results: Of the 92 patients, 23% (n = 21) had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and 10% on kidney replacement therapy at baseline. Among those with kidney involvement, mean (SD) enrollment eGFR was 33 (27) ml/min per 1.73 m2 with a mean (SD) change of +12 (25) and +20 (23) ml/min per 1.73 m2 at weeks 26 and 52, respectively. In addition to avacopan, 47% of patients received combination therapy of rituximab and low-dose cyclophosphamide, and 14% of patients received plasma exchange (PLEX). After induction, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to start avacopan was 3.6 (2.1-7.7) weeks, and the median time to discontinue prednisone after starting avacopan was 5.6 (3.3-9.5) weeks. Clinical remission was achieved in 90% of patients at week 26 and 84% of patients at week 52. Of the patients, 20% stopped avacopan due to adverse events, with the most common being elevated serum aminotransferases (4.3%). Conclusion: A high rate of remission and an acceptable safety profile were observed with the use of avacopan in the treatment of AAV in this postmarketing analysis, including the populations excluded from the ADVOCATE trial.
ABSTRACT
While the incidence of hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) is on the decline, it still occurs in up to 30% of patients with cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related hypercalcemia is becoming increasingly recognized. We describe a case of cemiplimab-induced hypercalcemia in a patient with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the earlobe and discuss a management algorithm for HCM. Timely diagnosis and management of HCM is critical for optimal care and the prevention of complications.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Hypercalcemia , Humans , Hypercalcemia/etiology , Hypercalcemia/diagnosis , Hypercalcemia/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Male , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The evolving landscape of cancer treatments has introduced new challenges, particularly related to adverse events associated with chemotherapeutic agents. To address these challenges, the fields of cardio-oncology and onco-nephrology have arisen, focusing on the management of cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity attributable to anti-cancer drugs. SUMMARY: Numerous intersections between these disciplines exist, including onco-hypertension (HTN) and cardiorenal toxicities induced by chemotherapeutic agents. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may cause myocarditis and nephritis. This paper aimed to explore the intersection between cardio-oncology and onco-nephrology. A detailed review will be undertaken, focusing on onco-HTN and the cardiorenal toxicities of chemotherapeutic agents, with a specific emphasis on the adverse effects associated with ICIs. KEY MESSAGES: Multidisciplinary collaboration among oncologists, cardiologists, nephrologists, and other healthcare professionals is crucial for developing tailored approaches to optimize treatment efficacy while minimizing the risk of cardiovascular and renal complications, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes in modern oncology practice.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Cardiotoxicity , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms , Nephrology , Humans , Cardiotoxicity/etiology , Cardiotoxicity/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Medical Oncology/methods , Cardiology , Cardio-Renal Syndrome/drug therapy , Cardio-Renal Syndrome/chemically induced , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/chemically induced , Cardio-OncologyABSTRACT
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) poses a significant concern in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative patients transplanted from EBV-positive donors (EBV R-/D+). Previous studies investigating the association between different induction agents and PTLD in these patients have yielded conflicting results. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database, we identified EBV R-/D+ patients >18 years of age who underwent kidney-alone transplants between 2016 and 2022 and compared the risk of PTLD with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG), basiliximab, and alemtuzumab inductions. Among the 6620 patients included, 64.0% received ATG, 23.4% received basiliximab, and 12.6% received alemtuzumab. The overall incidence of PTLD was 2.5% over a median follow-up period of 2.9 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the risk of PTLD was significantly higher with ATG and alemtuzumab compared with basiliximab (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-3.04, P = .002 for ATG and aSHR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.04-3.11, P = .04 for alemtuzumab). However, PTLD risk was comparable between ATG and alemtuzumab inductions (aSHR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.72-1.77, P = .61). Therefore, the risk of PTLD must be taken into consideration when selecting the most appropriate induction therapy for this patient population.
Subject(s)
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney Transplantation , Lymphoproliferative Disorders , Postoperative Complications , Tissue Donors , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/etiology , Male , Female , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/complications , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/etiology , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/virology , Middle Aged , Adult , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Graft Rejection/etiology , Antilymphocyte Serum/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Transplant Recipients , Incidence , Induction Chemotherapy/adverse effects , Basiliximab , Alemtuzumab/adverse effects , Kidney Function TestsABSTRACT
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a hematologic malignancy affecting the bone marrow and resulting in peripheral blood monocytosis. Kidney and urinary tract involvement is common and can present dramatically with life-threatening consequences. Kidney involvement can be the result of direct or indirect mechanisms, including prerenal azotemia, glomerular disease, tubulointerstitial involvement, and renovascular disorders. Urinary tract involvement, electrolyte and acid-base disorders, as well as nephrotoxicity from treatment of the disorder can also occur. Given this multifactorial pathogenesis involving several mechanisms concomitantly, nephrologists must exercise heightened awareness and maintain a low threshold for kidney biopsy. There is a pressing need for future research endeavors to elucidate and target the manifestations of CMML that involve the kidneys with the ultimate goal of augmenting overall prognosis and therapeutic outcomes.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Blood group B kidney transplant candidates have lower transplantation rates and longer waiting times compared to other blood groups. Kidney transplantation from blood group A2-to-B has offered a solution for these patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Basiliximab and Alemtuzumab induction therapies on kidney function and de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in blood type A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients within the first 12 months of post-transplant. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 110 consecutive A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients between January 2015 and December 2022. Of these, 46 (41.8%) received Basiliximab, while 64 (58.2%) received Alemtuzumab as induction therapy. Demographics and comorbidities data were collected and compared between the two groups. Serum samples collected at 4- and 12-month intervals post-transplant were used to assess the presence of de novo DSA. Kidney allograft function was evaluated by monitoring serum creatinine levels and assessing Creatinine Clearance based on 24-h urine collection at various time points. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 20.00% of patients who received Alemtuzumab developed de novo DSA, whereas none of the patients induced with Basiliximab developed de novo DSA (p = 0.038). Recipients who received Basiliximab were older (mean age = 72.00) and received higher Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) kidneys (mean = 75) compared to those induced with Alemtuzumab (mean age = 58.00, mean KDPI = 49) (p < 0.001), with no significant difference observed in the last follow-up creatinine clearance or creatinine levels between the two groups (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: The use of Basiliximab as induction immunosuppression in A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients is associated with a lower incidence of de novo HLA DSA formation without significant differences in overall renal function compared to Alemtuzumab.
Subject(s)
Blood Group Antigens , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Aged , Middle Aged , Basiliximab/therapeutic use , Alemtuzumab/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Creatinine , Kidney , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft SurvivalABSTRACT
The number of kidney after liver transplants (KALT) increased after the implementation of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) safety net policy, but the effects of the policy on KALT outcomes remain unknown. Using the UNOS database, we identified KALT between 60 and 365 days from liver transplant from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. The main outcome was 1- and 3-year patient, liver, and kidney graft survival. Secondary outcomes included 6-month and 1-year acute rejection (AR) of liver and kidney, and 1-year kidney allograft function. Of the 256 KALT, 90 were pre-policy and 166 post-policy. Compared to pre-policy, post-policy 1- and 3-year liver graft survival was higher (54% and 54% vs. 86% and 81%, respectively, p <0.001), while 1- and 3-year kidney graft survival (99% and 75% vs. 92% and 79%, respectively, p =0.19), and 1- and 3-year patient survival (99% and 99% vs. 95% and 89%, respectively, p =0.11) were not significantly different. Subgroup analysis revealed similar trends in patients with and without renal failure at liver transplant. Liver AR at 6 months was lower post-policy (6.3% vs. 18.3%, p =0.006) but was similar (10.5% vs. 13%, p =0.63) at 1 year. Kidney AR was unchanged post-policy at 6 months and 1 year. Creatinine at 1 year did not differ post-policy versus pre-policy (1.4 vs. 1.3 mg/dL, p =0.07) despite a higher proportion of deceased donors, higher Kidney Donor Profile Index, and longer kidney cold ischemia time post-policy ( p <0.05 for all). This 3-year follow-up after the 2017 UNOS policy revision demonstrated that the safety net implementation has resulted in improved liver outcomes for patients who underwent KALT with no increased AR of the liver or the kidney allografts.
ABSTRACT
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in cirrhotic patients affecting almost 20% of these patients. While multiple etiologies can lead to AKI, pre-renal azotemia seems to be the most common cause of AKI. Irrespective of the cause, AKI is associated with worse survival with the poorest outcomes observed in those with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN). In recent years, new definitions, and classifications of AKI in cirrhosis have emerged. More knowledge has also become available regarding the benefits and drawbacks of albumin and terlipressin use in these patients. Diagnostic tools such as urinary biomarkers and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) became available and they will be used in the near future to differentiate between different causes of AKI and direct management of AKI in these patients. In this update, we will review these new classifications, treatment recommendations, and diagnostic tools for AKI in cirrhotic patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis is common and associated with high morbidity, but the incidence rates of different etiologies of AKI are not well described in the US. We compared incidence rates, practice patterns, and outcomes across etiologies of AKI in cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 11 hospital networks, including consecutive adult patients admitted with AKI and cirrhosis in 2019. The etiology of AKI was adjudicated based on pre-specified clinical definitions (prerenal/hypovolemic AKI, hepatorenal syndrome [HRS-AKI], acute tubular necrosis [ATN], other). RESULTS: A total of 2,063 patients were included (median age 62 [IQR 54-69] years, 38.3% female, median MELD-Na score 26 [19-31]). The most common etiology was prerenal AKI (44.3%), followed by ATN (30.4%) and HRS-AKI (12.1%); 6.0% had other AKI, and 7.2% could not be classified. In our cohort, 8.1% of patients received a liver transplant and 36.5% died by 90 days. The lowest rate of death was observed in patients with prerenal AKI (22.2%; p <0.001), while death rates were higher but not significantly different from each other in those with HRS-AKI and ATN (49.0% vs. 52.7%; p = 0.42). Using prerenal AKI as a reference, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) for 90-day mortality was higher for HRS-AKI (sHR 2.78; 95% CI 2.18-3.54; p <0.001) and ATN (sHR 2.83; 95% CI 2.36-3.41; p <0.001). In adjusted analysis, higher AKI stage and lack of complete response to treatment were associated with an increased risk of 90-day mortality (p <0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: AKI is a severe complication of cirrhosis. HRS-AKI is uncommon and is associated with similar outcomes to ATN. The etiology of AKI, AKI stage/severity, and non-response to treatment were associated with mortality. Further optimization of vasoconstrictors for HRS-AKI and supportive therapies for ATN are needed. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis carries high morbidity, and management is determined by the etiology of injury. However, a large and well-adjudicated multicenter database from US centers that uses updated AKI definitions is lacking. Our findings demonstrate that acute tubular necrosis and hepatorenal syndrome have similar outcomes (â¼50% mortality at 90 days), though hepatorenal syndrome is uncommon (12% of all AKI cases). These findings represent practice patterns at US transplant/tertiary centers and can be used as a baseline, presenting the situation prior to the adoption of terlipressin in the US.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Hepatorenal Syndrome , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Hepatorenal Syndrome/epidemiology , Hepatorenal Syndrome/etiology , Incidence , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Necrosis/complications , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Monkeypox is a rapidly spreading infection worldwide and is a public health concern, especially with newly reported fatality cases. The characteristics and disease course of monkeypox infection in transplant recipients remain elusive because no case reports have been published detailing its clinical presentation and outcome in this population. We report a case of a kidney transplant recipient who developed end-stage renal disease secondary to HIV-associated nephropathy and manifested monkeypox infection after kidney transplantation. The patient had severe clinical manifestations, including disseminated vesicular skin rash, diffuse mucosal involvement, urine retention, proctitis, and bowel obstruction. We also highlight several clinical considerations regarding the use of tecovirimat, a novel antiviral therapy with activity against orthopoxviruses that has been used in the United States to treat monkeypox infection.
Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Mpox (monkeypox) , Humans , Transplant Recipients , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents , BenzamidesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: By the time they complete breast cancer therapy, many young patients are still of childbearing age. We aim to estimate the incidence of pregnancies in women who completed treatment and examine the percentage of patients who received fertility counseling before initiation of therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic health records of breast cancer patients between 2008 and 2014 at AUBMC were screened for exclusion criteria of having metastatic disease or known infertility, still receiving therapy, and being above 42 years at diagnosis. Data about therapy and tumor characteristics was obtained for the included survivors who were interviewed as well via telephone for information about fertility preservation counseling, pregnancy occurrence, and delivery. RESULTS: 451 breast cancer patients were identified. 39 patients remained after application of exclusion criteria. 30.76% (n = 12) wanted more children at the time of diagnosis. 10.25% (n = 4) of all 39 patients treated for breast cancer achieved one or more pregnancy after a median time of 3.83 years after completion of therapy. 25% (n = 3) of women who wanted more children at diagnosis (n = 12) were able to conceive. 23.07% (n = 9) of patients discussed fertility with their primary oncologist prior to treatment initiation. 35.89% (n = 14) of patients were aware of fertility preservation technique availability, but none of these patients used one. CONCLUSIONS: The observed rate of pregnancy is comparable to the literature. There is a lack in fertility counseling of breast cancer patients, and the rate of use of fertility preservation techniques is very low despite prior knowledge about their availability.