Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
CJEM ; 18(5): 349-57, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27346634

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of delayed complications, specifically hemothorax, and functional outcome in patients with isolated sternal fracture discharged from the emergency department (ED) compared to patients with other minor thoracic trauma. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted in four university-affiliated Canadian EDs. Patients ages 16 and older discharged from the ED with an isolated minor thoracic injury were included and categorized as isolated sternal fracture, rib fracture, or no fracture. A standardized clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at 7 and 14 days as well as a phone follow-up at 30 and 90 days post-injury. Functional outcome was determined using the Medical Outcome Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: A total of 969 patients were included, of whom 32 (3.3%) had an isolated sternal fracture, 304 (31.3%) had rib fracture, and 633 (65.3%) had no fracture. Within 14 days, 112 patients presented with a delayed hemothorax: 12.5% of sternal fracture patients, 23% of rib fracture(s) patients, and 6% of minor thoracic injury patients without fracture (p<0.05). At 90 days, 57.1% of patients with sternal fracture had moderate to severe disability compared to 25.4% and 21.2% for both of the other groups, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, we found that 12.5% (n=4, p<0.05) of patients with sternal fracture developed a delayed hemothorax, but the clinical significance of this remains questionable. The proportion of patients with sternal fracture who had moderate to severe disability was significantly higher than that of patients with other minor thoracic trauma.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Fractures, Bone/complications , Hemothorax/physiopathology , Sternum/injuries , Academic Medical Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Canada , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Delayed Diagnosis , Disability Evaluation , Female , Fracture Healing/physiology , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Hemothorax/etiology , Humans , Incidence , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Rib Fractures/complications , Rib Fractures/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/therapy
2.
CJEM ; 16(3): 229-42, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24852587

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The lifetime prevalence of ureterolithiasis is approximately 13% for men and 7% for women in the United States. Tamsulosin, an α-antagonist, has been used as therapy to facilitate the expulsion of lithiasis. Whether it is a good treatment for distal lithiasis remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of tamsulosin on the passage of distal ureterolithiasis. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Trial eligibility was evaluated by two investigators. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tamsulosin to standard therapy or placebo for the treatment of a single distal ureterolithiasis ≤ 10 mm in adult patients with renal colic confirmed by radiographic imaging were included. Data extraction was conducted in duplicate. Primary outcome was the expulsion rate, and secondary outcomes were the mean time for ureterolithiasis expulsion, analgesic requirements, and side effects. Mantel-Haenszel random effect models were used, and heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Data were presented with relative risks (RRs). RESULTS: The search strategy identified 685 articles, of which 22 studies were included. Combined results suggested a benefit for the expulsion of ureterolithiasis (≤ 10 mm) when tamsulosin was used compared to a standard treatment (RR 1.50 [95% CI 1.31-1.71], I²  =  70%). A decrease in the average time of expulsion of the ureterolithiasis of 3.33 days in favour of tamsulosin was observed (95% CI -4.23, -2.44], I²  =  67%). CONCLUSION: Tamsulosin increases the rate of spontaneous passage of distal ureterolithiasis (≤ 10 mm).


Subject(s)
Renal Colic/etiology , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Ureterolithiasis/drug therapy , Humans , Renal Colic/drug therapy , Tamsulosin , Ureterolithiasis/complications , Urological Agents/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL