[Highly pathogenic influenza pandemic: results of a feasibility study in a general practice (SIMUGRIP-MG2)]. / Pandémie grippale à virus hautement pathogène : étude de faisabilité en cabinet (SIMUGRIP-MG2).

The French Pandemic Influenza Plan ("Plan National de Prévention et de Lutte Pandémie Grippale") places general practitioners at the heart of the provision of care to patients through consultations and house calls. The purpose of this study was to determine whether GP practices are able to provide treatment to flu patients within their premises in the event of a highly pathogenic influenza pandemic. A simulation exercise conducted in a GP practice (SIMUGRIP-MG2) was carried out in the autumn of 2009. 3 general practitioners, the practice secretary, 33 patients and care staff took part in the exercise during a half day of practice. The study found that the quality of some hygiene practices and procedures was inadequate: the duration of handwashing was too short (mean: 11.8 seconds), gloves were not worn, and FFP2 masks were often handled. The study found that the implementation of these procedures required increased effort and attention from GPs. It was also found that this type of consultation requires additional preparation time (refitting, supply of materials) and generates additional costs (linked, for example, to storage issues). In seeking to improve the quality of care provided to infected patients in the event of an influenza pandemic, several factors must be considered, including recent data on the effectiveness of countermeasures, additional training to improve hygiene practices, and infrastructure modernization to improve ergonomics in GP practices.

[Evaluation of a screening programme for diabetic retinopathy (DODIA study)]. / Dépistage de la rétinopathie diabétique par des photographies do fond d'oeil. Evaluation d'un programme en médecine libérale (étude DODIA).

CONTEXT: In France, 43% to 63% of diabetics have an annual fundoscopy. Do the new screening tools, coupled with teletransmission of the images, allow for satisfying ophthalmological screening? It is an important matter given the foreseeable reduction in the number of French ophthalmologists in the forthcoming years. OBJECTIVES: To measure the quality of screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR), in the framework of a network, by the provision of a retinograph by numeric camera (with teletransmission of the images and centralised interpretation), in a screening centre located in town. METHOD: The study evaluated the quality of screening obtained in two comparable groups of general practitioners, one using the retinograph and the other using the classical method of screening by ophthalmologist. The screening was targeted at diabetics who had not had a fundoscopy in the preceding year, nor had known DR or a treating ophthalmologist (for the retinography group only). RESULTS: 667 patients were sampled in the retinography group (456 included) and 707 in the control group (426 included) between 1/04/02 and 1/11/02; 417 patients were followed until the end of the study in the 2 groups. A screening examination was considered effective if it was performed within the six months following its request, and by the presence of a report in the file of the general practitioner. The percentage of patients thus screened was 74% in the retinography group and 71,5% in the other group (not significant). 16% of diabetics in the retinography group had DR compared with 10% of patients in the control group. The analysis of the level of satisfaction of patients tended to show a preference for the system of screening by fundal photography. CONCLUSION: In the framework of a healthcare network, the availability of a retinograph by numeric camera, with the interpretation of photos by teletransmission of the images, obtained a high level of quality of screening for diabetic retinopathy that was at least as good as that obtained by a healthcare network using the classical ophthalmological screening method.