Functional Outcome After Simultaneous Vestibular Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation With Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry has emerged as a suitable option to intraoperatively assess cochlear nerve function during vestibular schwannoma resection. This study aimed to analyze the functional outcome and implant usage of patients with preserved auditory nerve responses after simultaneous translabyrinthine schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: Patients with unilateral sporadic vestibular schwannoma underwent translabyrinthine tumor resection. Intraoperatively, electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry was performed before and after tumor removal. Cochlear implantation was carried out if positive responses were detected after tumor removal indicating cochlear nerve function. Postoperatively, patients were biannually followed-up to assess aided sound field audiometry and word recognition as well as implant usage. RESULTS: Overall, 26 patients with vestibular schwannoma underwent translabyrinthine schwannoma resection. Out of these patients, 15 had positive cochlear nerve responses after tumor removal and concurrently received a cochlear implant. In 13 patients with histologically confirmed vestibular schwannoma, hearing improved by 23.7 ± 33.2 decibels and word recognition by 25.0 ± 42.4% over a mean follow-up period of 18 months. Overall, 12 included patients were regular cochlear implant users. CONCLUSION: Patients with vestibular schwannoma can benefit substantially from cochlear implantation. Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve function using electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry can help to better identify individuals eligible for simultaneous vestibular schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation.

The Effect of Pulse Shape and Interphase Gaps on Speech Perception and Perceived Sound Quality in Electrical Hearing.

BACKGROUND: Stimulation with triphasic pulses has been shown to reduce the occurrence of unwanted facial nerve stimulation (FNS) with cochlear implants (CIs). However, there is little data available on how different pulse shapes affect the hearing outcome with electrical hearing in general. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of different stimulation pulse shapes on speech perception in noise, as well as loudness perception and subjective sound quality. METHODS: Twenty experienced cochlear-implant users not suffering from FNS participated in a prospective single-visit study. Based on the subjects' current clinical fitting, six fitting maps with different pulse shapes (biphasic and triphasic) and different interphase gap (IPG) durations (2.1 µs, 10 µs, and 20 µs) were created. First, the loudness was balanced for each configuration by adjusting the stimulation charge amount. Then, speech perception in noise was measured with a German matrix sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence test). The perception of particular sound attributes of speech and music, as well as overall preference, was evaluated with visual analog scales. RESULTS: Similar levels of speech perception were obtained with triphasic stimulation ( P = 0.891) and longer IPGs ( P = 0.361) compared to the subjects' clinical map settings. The stimulation amplitudes for equal loudness were significantly higher with triphasic stimulation compared to biphasic stimulation when keeping the IPG constant. Increasing the IPG had a significantly larger effect on perceived loudness ( P < 0.0001) and charge reduction for equal loudness with triphasic pulses compared to biphasic pulses. Triphasic configuration showed lower overall subjective sound quality ratings than biphasic for speech intelligibility, clarity, naturalness, and overall preference, as well as for music naturalness, and overall preference in the acute setting without adaptation time. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons against the clinical map revealed significantly lower speech naturalness ratings for triphasic with 2.1 µs IPG and for triphasic with 20 µs IPG only. CONCLUSION: Although some sound quality attributes were rated lower compared to the clinical map in the acute test setting, stimulation with triphasic pulses does not affect speech perception in noise and can be considered as a valuable option in CI fitting.

Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine.

Background: Robotic surgery has been proposed in various surgical fields to reduce recovery time, scarring, and to improve patients' outcomes. Such innovations are ever-growing and have now reached the field of cochlear implantation. To implement robotic ear surgery in routine, it is of interest if preoperative planning of a safe trajectory to the middle ear is possible with clinically available image data. Methods: We evaluated the feasibility of robotic cochlear implant surgery in 50 patients (100 ears) scheduled for routine cochlear implant procedures based on clinically available imaging. The primary objective was to assess if available high-resolution computed tomography or cone beam tomography imaging is sufficient for planning a trajectory by an otological software. Secondary objectives were to assess the feasibility of cochlear implant surgery with a drill bit diameter of 1.8 mm, which is the currently used as a standard drill bit. Furthermore, it was evaluated if feasibility of robotic surgery could be increased when using smaller drill bit sizes. Cochlear and trajectory parameters of successfully planned ears were collected. Measurements were carried out by two observers and the interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. Results: Under the prerequisite of the available image data being sufficient for the planning of the procedure, up to two thirds of ears were eligible for robotic cochlear implant surgery with the standard drill bit size of 1.8 mm. The main reason for inability to plan the keyhole access was insufficient image resolution causing anatomical landmarks not being accurately identified. Although currently not applicable in robotic cochlear implantation, narrower drill bit sizes ranging from 1.0 to 1.7 mm in diameter could increase feasibility up to 100%. The interrater agreement between the two observers was good for this data set. Discussion: For robotic cochlear implant surgery, imaging with sufficient resolution is essential for preoperative assessment. A slice thickness of <0.3 mm is necessary for trajectory planning. This can be achieved by using digital volume tomography while radiation exposure can be kept to a minimum. Furthermore, surgeons who use the software tool, should be trained on a regular basis in order to achieve planning consistency.

Evaluation of Levels of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Human Perilymph and Plasma After Intratympanic Application in Patients Receiving Cochlear Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The use of intratympanically applied steroids is of increasing interest. Consequently, research has focused on finding an ideal drug that diffuses through the round window membrane and can be retained in the perilymph. Objective: To compare levels of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) in perilymph and plasma after intratympanic injection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial included 40 patients receiving cochlear implants at a single tertiary care center in Vienna, Austria. Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups receiving 1 of 2 intratympanic doses of TAC (10 mg/mL or 40 mg/mL) at 1 of 2 approximate time points (24 hours or 1 hour) before sampling the perilymph. Inclusion was carried out between November 2017 and January 2020, and data were analyzed in December 2020. Interventions: All patients underwent intratympanic injection of TAC. During cochlear implantation, perilymph and plasma were sampled for further analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Levels of TAC measured in perilymph and plasma. Results: Among the 37 patients (median [range] age, 57 [26-88] years; 18 [49%] men) included in the analysis, TAC was present at a median (range) level of 796.0 (46.4-7706.7) ng/mL. In the majority of patients (n = 29; 78%), no drug was detectable in the plasma after intratympanic injection. Levels above the limit of detection were less than 2.5 ng/mL. The 1-factorial analysis of variance model showed lower TAC levels in the group that received TAC, 10 mg/mL, 24 hours before surgery (median, 271 ng/mL) compared with the group that received TAC, 10 mg/mL, 1 hour before surgery (median, 2877 ng/mL), as well as in comparison with the groups receiving TAC, 40 mg/mL, 24 hours before surgery (median, 2150 ng/mL) and 1 hour before surgery (median, 939 ng/mL). The 2-factorial analysis of variance model showed lower TAC levels in the group receiving TAC, 10 mg/mL, 24 hours before surgery than the group receiving TAC, 10 mg/mL, 1 hour before surgery, and higher TAC levels in the group receiving TAC, 40 mg/mL, 24 hours before surgery compared with the group receiving TAC, 10 mg/mL, 24 hours before surgery. Patients with thickening of the middle ear had statistically significantly higher plasma levels (median, 1.4 ng/mL vs 0 ng/mL) and lower perilymph levels (median, 213.1 ng/mL vs 904 ng/mL) than individuals with unremarkable middle ear mucosa. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, TAC was shown to be a promising drug for intratympanic therapies, with similar levels in perilymph 1 hour and 24 hours after injection (distinctly in the groups receiving the 40 mg/mL dose). There was also minimal dissemination to the plasma, especially in patients with unremarkable middle ear mucosa. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03248856.

Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency.

OBJECTIVES: Temporal fine structure information such as low-frequency sounds including the fundamental frequency (F0) is important to separate different talkers in noisy environments. Speech perception in noise is negatively affected by reduced temporal fine structure resolution in cochlear hearing loss. It has been shown that normal-hearing (NH) people as well as cochlear implant patients with preserved acoustic low-frequency hearing benefit from different F0 between concurrent talkers. Though patients with an active middle ear implant (AMEI) report better sound quality compared with hearing aids, they often struggle when listening in noise. The primary objective was to evaluate whether or not patients with a Vibrant Soundbridge AMEI were able to benefit from F0 differences in a concurrent talker situation and if the effect was comparable to NH individuals. DESIGN: A total of 13 AMEI listeners and 13 NH individuals were included. A modified variant of the Oldenburg sentence test was used to emulate a concurrent talker scenario. One sentence from the test corpus served as the masker and the remaining sentences as target speech. The F0 of the masker sentence was shifted upward by 4, 8, and 12 semitones. The target and masker sentences were presented simultaneously to the study subjects and the speech reception threshold was assessed by adaptively varying the masker level. To evaluate any impact of the occlusion effect on speech perception, AMEI listeners were tested in two configurations: with a plugged ear-canal contralateral to the implant side, indicated as AMEIcontra, or with both ears plugged, indicated as AMEIboth. RESULTS: In both study groups, speech perception improved when the F0 difference between target and masker increased. This was significant when the difference was at least 8 semitones; the F0-based release from masking was 3.0 dB in AMEIcontra (p = 0.009) and 2.9 dB in AMEIboth (p = 0.015), compared with 5.6 dB in NH listeners (p < 0.001). A difference of 12 semitones revealed a F0-based release from masking of 3.5 dB in the AMEIcontra (p = 0.002) and 3.4 dB in the AMEIboth (p = 0.003) condition, compared with 5.0 dB in NH individuals (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Though AMEI users deal with problems resulting from cochlear damage, hearing amplification with the implant enables a masking release based on F0 differences when F0 between a target and masker sentence was at least 8 semitones. Additional occlusion of the ear canal on the implant side did not affect speech performance. The current results complement the knowledge about the benefit of F0 within the acoustic low-frequency hearing.

Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.

It has been shown that patients with electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) perform better in noisy environments than patients with a cochlear implant (CI). One reason for this could be the preserved access to acoustic low-frequency cues including the fundamental frequency (F0). Therefore, our primary aim was to investigate whether users of EAS experience a release from masking with increasing F0 difference between target talker and masking talker. The study comprised 29 patients and consisted of three groups of subjects: EAS users, CI users and normal-hearing listeners (NH). All CI and EAS users were implanted with a MED-EL cochlear implant and had at least 12 months of experience with the implant. Speech perception was assessed with the Oldenburg sentence test (OlSa) using one sentence from the test corpus as speech masker. The F0 in this masking sentence was shifted upwards by 4, 8, or 12 semitones. For each of these masker conditions the speech reception threshold (SRT) was assessed by adaptively varying the masker level while presenting the target sentences at a fixed level. A statistically significant improvement in speech perception was found for increasing difference in F0 between target sentence and masker sentence in EAS users (p = 0.038) and in NH listeners (p = 0.003). In CI users (classic CI or EAS users with electrical stimulation only) speech perception was independent from differences in F0 between target and masker. A release from masking with increasing difference in F0 between target and masking speech was only observed in listeners and configurations in which the low-frequency region was presented acoustically. Thus, the speech information contained in the low frequencies seems to be crucial for allowing listeners to separate multiple sources. By combining acoustic and electric information, EAS users even manage tasks as complicated as segregating the audio streams from multiple talkers. Preserving the natural code, like fine-structure cues in the low-frequency region, seems to be crucial to provide CI users with the best benefit.