Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Outcomes in Asian Compared With European-American Institutions.

Background: Clinical outcome and interventional thresholds for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) were developed in studies of patients at European and American institutions (EAIs), but little is known about patients at Asian institutions (AsIs). Objectives: This study sought to contrast DMR presentation/management/outcomes of AsI patients vs EAI patients. Methods: Patients with DMR due to flail leaflet from Hong Kong and Singapore (AsI cohort, n = 737) were compared with EAI patients (n = 682) enrolled in the MIDA (Mitral regurgitation International Database) registry with similar eligibility criteria. Results: AsI patients presented similar DMR lesion/consequences vs EAI patients, but they were younger, with fewer symptoms (74% vs 44% Class I), more sinus rhythm (83% vs 69%), and lower EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) (0.9 ± 0.5 vs 1.4 ± 1.5; all P < 0.0001). Imaging showed smaller absolute left atrial/ventricular dimensions in AsI patients, belying cardiac dilatation with larger body surface area-indexed diameters (all P < 0.01). Surgical/interventional mitral repair was similarly predominant (90% vs 91%; P = 0.47), and early repair was similarly beneficial (for AsI patients, adjusted HR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.16-0.49; for EAI patients, HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.20-0.49; both P < 0.0001). However, AsI patients underwent fewer interventions (55% ± 2% vs 77% ± 2% at 1 year; P < 0.0001) and incurred excess mortality (adjusted HR: 1.60 [95% CI: 1.13-2.27] vs EAI patients; P = 0.008) at long-term postdiagnosis. Propensity score matching (434 patient pairs), which balanced all clinical characteristics, confirmed that there was undertreatment and excess mortality in the long term in AsI patients with DMR (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Imaging may underestimate volume overload in AsI patients due to smaller cardiac cavities related to smaller body size compared with EAI patients with similar mitral lesions and DMR severity. AsI patients enjoy similar mitral repair predominance and early intervention benefits but undergo fewer mitral interventions than EAI patients and incur subsequent excess mortality, suggesting the need to account for imaging and cultural specificity to improve DMR outcomes worldwide.

Survival loss linked to guideline-based indications for degenerative mitral regurgitation surgery.

AIMS: Operating on patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) is based on ACC/AHA or ESC/EACTS-guidelines. Doubts persist on best surgical indications and their potential association with postoperative survival loss. We sought to investigate whether guideline-based indications lead to late postoperative survival loss in DMR-patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: : We analyzed outcome of 2833 patients from the MIDA-registry undergoing surgical correction of DMR. Patients were stratified by surgical indications: Class-I-trigger (symptoms, left ventricular end-systolic diameter≥40mm, or left ventricular ejection fraction<60%, n=1677), isolated-Class-IIa-trigger (atrial fibrillation [AF], pulmonary hypertension [PH], or left atrial diameter≥55mm, n=568), or no-trigger (n=588). Postoperative survival was compared after matching for clinical differences. Restricted-mean-survival time (RMST) was analyzed. During a median 8.5-year follow-up, 603 deaths occurred. Long-term postoperative survival was lower with Class-I-trigger than in Class-IIa-trigger and no-trigger (71.4±1.9%, 84.3±2.3%, 88.9±1.9% at 10 years, p<0.001). Having at least one Class-I-criterion led to excess mortality (p<0.001), while several Class-I-criteria conferred additional death-risk (HR:1.53, 95%CI:1.42-1.66). Isolated-Class-IIa-triggers conferred an excess mortality risk versus those without (HR:1.46, 95%CI:1.00-2.13, p=0.05). Among these patients, isolated-PH led to decreased postoperative-survival versus those without (83.7%±2.8% vs. 89.3%±1.6%, p=0.011), with the same pattern observed for AF (81.8%±5.0% vs. 88.3%±1.5%, p=0.023). According to RMST-analysis, compare to those operated on without triggers, operating on Class-I-trigger patients led to 9.4-month survival-loss (p<0.001) and operating on isolated-Class-IIa-trigger patients displayed 4.9-month survival loss (p=0.001) after 10-years. CONCLUSIONS: : Waiting for the onset of Class-I or isolated-Class-IIa-triggers before operating on DMR patients is associated with postoperative survival loss. These data encourage an early surgical-strategy.

Indexing left ventricular end-systolic dimension to body size: Association with mortality in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation.

AIMS: In patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is associated with increased risk of heart failure and excess mortality. LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) is an established trigger for intervention, yet recommended LVESD thresholds apply poorly to patients with small body size. Whether LV normalization to body surface area (BSA) may be used as a trigger for DMR correction is unknown. We examined the link between LVESD index (LVESDi) and outcome in DMR to identify appropriate thresholds for excess mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study focuses on 2753 consecutive patients with DMR due to flail leaflets diagnosed in tertiary centres from Europe and the United States, with prospective echocardiographic measurement of LVESD and BSA and long-term follow-up. The primary endpoint was mortality after diagnosis under conservative management. Secondary endpoints were mortality under conservative and surgical management and postoperative mortality of patients who underwent surgery. The optimal LVESDi cut-off for mortality prediction was 20 mm/m2. Irrespective of management type, 10-year survival was lower with LVESDi ≥20 mm/m2 than with LVESDi <20 mm/m2 (both p < 0.001). After covariate adjustment, LVESDi ≥20 mm/m2 was independently predictive of mortality under conservative management (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.75), and with conservative and surgical management (adjusted HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17-1.54). LVESDi remained associated with poorer postoperative outcome in patients who underwent intervention. LVESDi showed higher incremental predictive value over the baseline model compared to LVESD. The association between LVESDi ≥20 mm/m2 and outcome was consistent in subgroups of patients with DMR. CONCLUSIONS: In severe DMR due to flail leaflets, LVESDi is a marker of risk additive and incremental to LVESD. Its use in clinical practice should lead to earlier referral to mitral valve surgery and improved long-term outcome.

egr3 is a mechanosensitive transcription factor gene required for cardiac valve morphogenesis.

Biomechanical forces, and their molecular transducers, including key mechanosensitive transcription factor genes, such as KLF2, are required for cardiac valve morphogenesis. However, klf2 mutants fail to completely recapitulate the valveless phenotype observed under no-flow conditions. Here, we identify the transcription factor EGR3 as a conserved biomechanical force transducer critical for cardiac valve formation. We first show that egr3 null zebrafish display a complete and highly penetrant loss of valve leaflets, leading to severe blood regurgitation. Using tissue-specific loss- and gain-of-function tools, we find that during cardiac valve formation, Egr3 functions cell-autonomously in endothelial cells, and identify one of its effectors, the nuclear receptor Nr4a2b. We further find that mechanical forces up-regulate egr3/EGR3 expression in the developing zebrafish heart and in porcine valvular endothelial cells, as well as during human aortic valve remodeling. Altogether, these findings reveal that EGR3 is necessary to transduce the biomechanical cues required for zebrafish cardiac valve morphogenesis, and potentially for pathological aortic valve remodeling in humans.

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair vs. isolated mitral surgery for severe mitral regurgitation: a French nationwide study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mitral valve surgery and, more recently, mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) are the two treatments of severe mitral regurgitation in eligible patients. Clinical comparison of both therapies remains limited by the number of patients analysed. The objective of this study was to analyse the outcomes of mitral TEER vs. isolated mitral valve surgery at a nationwide level in France. METHODS: Based on the French administrative hospital discharge database, the study collected information for all consecutive patients treated for mitral regurgitation with isolated TEER or isolated mitral valve surgery between 2012 and 2022. Propensity score matching was used for the analysis of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 57 030 patients were found in the database. After matching on baseline characteristics, 2160 patients were analysed in each arm. At 3-year follow-up, TEER was associated with significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 0.685, 95% confidence interval 0.563-0.832; P = .0001), pacemaker implantation, and stroke. Non-cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 1.562, 95% confidence interval 1.238-1.971; P = .0002), recurrent pulmonary oedema, and cardiac arrest were more frequent after TEER. No significant differences between the two groups were observed regarding all-cause death (hazard ratio 0.967, 95% confidence interval 0.835-1.118; P = .65), endocarditis, major bleeding, atrial fibrillation, and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that TEER for severe mitral regurgitation was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality than mitral surgery at long-term follow-up. Pacemaker implantation and stroke were less frequently observed after TEER.