Pediatric trauma in the California-Mexico border region: Injury disparities by Area Deprivation Index.

BACKGROUND: The California-Mexico border region is a high-volume trauma area with populations of widely disparate socioeconomic status. This work analyzed differences in demographics and mechanism of injury in children using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a composite measure of 17 markers of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of pediatric patients evaluated at the regional Level I Pediatric Trauma Center between 2008 and 2018. Collected data included patient demographics and injury characteristics. Patient addresses were correlated to neighborhood disadvantage level using ADI quintiles, with a higher quintile representing greater socioeconomic disadvantage. RESULTS: A total of 9,715 children were identified, of which 4,307 (44%) were Hispanic. Hispanic children were more likely to live in more disadvantaged neighborhoods than non-Hispanic children (p < 0.001). There were markedly different injury mechanisms in neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage (higher ADI) compared with those with less socioeconomic disadvantage. Sports-related and nonmotorized vehicular trauma predominated in less disadvantaged neighborhoods, while higher ADI quintiles were strongly associated with pedestrian versus automobile, motorized vehicle accidents/collisions, and nonaccidental injuries (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This analysis represents the first study to characterize pediatric traumatic injury patterns based upon the neighborhood ADI metric. Area Deprivation Index can be a useful resource in identifying disparities in pediatric trauma and children at increased risk for vehicular and abusive injury who may benefit from increased resource allocation, social support, and prevention programs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, Level III.

Multiple Tissue Biomarkers Independently and Additively Predict Prostate Cancer Pathology Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing indolent from aggressive prostate cancer remains a key challenge for decision making regarding prostate cancer management. A growing number of biomarkers are now available to help address this need, but these have rarely been examined together in the same patients to determine their potentially additive value. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether two previously validated plasma markers (transforming growth factor ß1 [TGFß1] and interleukin-6 soluble receptor [IL6-SR]) and two validated tissue scores (the Genomic Evaluators of Metastatic Prostate Cancer [GEMCaP] and cell cycle progression [CCP] scores) can improve on clinical parameters in predicting adverse pathology after prostatectomy, and how much they vary within tumors with heterogeneous Gleason grade. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A case-control study was conducted among men with low-risk cancers defined by biopsy grade group (GG) 1, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤10 ng/mL, and clinical stage ≤ T2 who underwent immediate prostatectomy. We collected paraffin-fixed prostatectomy tissue and presurgical plasma samples from 381 cases from the University of California, San Francisco, and 260 cases from the University of Washington. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Pathologic outcomes were minor upgrading/upstaging (GG 2 or pT3a) or major upgrading/upstaging (GG ≥ 3 or ≥ pT3b), and multinomial regression was performed to determine putative markers' ability to predict these outcomes, controlling for PSA, percent of positive biopsy cores, age, and clinical site. For upgraded tumors, a secondary analysis of the GEMCaP and CCP scores from the higher-grade tumor was also performed to evaluate for heterogeneity. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 357 men had no upgrading/upstaging event at prostatectomy, 236 had a minor event, and 67 had a major event. Neither TGFß1 nor IL6-SR was statistically significantly associated with any upgrading/upstaging. On the contrary, both the CCP and the GEMCaP score obtained from Gleason pattern 3 tissue were directly associated with minor and major upgrading/upstaging on univariate analysis. The two scores correlated with each other, but weakly. On multinomial analysis including both scores in the model, the CCP score predicted minor upgrading/upstaging (odds ratio [OR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.49) and major upgrading/upstaging (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.05-4.90), p =  0.04), and the GEMCaP score also predicted minor upgrading/upstaging (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08) and major upgrading/upstaging (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.11), p <  0.01). The other clinical parameters were not significant in this model. Among upgraded tumors including both Gleason patterns 3 and 4, both the GEMCaP and the CCP score tended to be higher from the higher-grade tumor. The main limitation was the use of virtual biopsies from prostatectomy tissue as surrogates for prostate biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarker signatures based on analyses of both DNA and RNA significantly and independently predict adverse pathology among men with clinically low-risk prostate cancer undergoing prostatectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Validated biomarker scores derived from both prostate cancer DNA and prostate cancer RNA can add independent information to help predict outcomes after prostatectomy.

Performance of the Genomic Evaluators of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (GEMCaP) tumor biomarker for identifying recurrent disease in African American patients.

Evaluation of prostate cancer prognosis after surgery is increasingly relying upon genomic analyses of tumor DNA. We assessed the ability of the biomarker panel Genomic Evaluators of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (GEMCaP) to predict biochemical recurrence in 33 European American and 28 African American prostate cancer cases using genome-wide copy number data from a previous study. "Biomarker positive" was defined as ≥20% of the 38 constituent copy number gain/loss GEMCaP loci affected in a given tumor; based on this threshold, the frequency of a positive biomarker was significantly lower in African Americans (n = 2; 7%) than European Americans (n = 11; 33%; P = 0.013). GEMCaP positivity was associated with risk of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR), 5.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.32-15.11; P = 3 × 10(-4)] in the full sample and among European Americans (HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.13-10.51; P = 0.032) but was not estimable in African Americans due to the low rate of GEMCaP positivity. Overall, the GEMCaP recurrence positive predictive value (PPV) was 85%; in African Americans, PPV was 100%. When we expanded the definition of loss to include copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (i.e., loss of one allele with concomitant duplication of the other), recurrence PPV was 83% for European American subjects. Under this definition, 5 African American subjects had a positive GEMCaP test value; 4 went on to develop biochemical recurrence (PPV = 80%). Our results suggest that the GEMCaP biomarker set could be an effective predictor for both European American and African American men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who may benefit from immediate aggressive therapy after radical prostatectomy.

Paclitaxel induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells through different calcium--regulating mechanisms depending on external calcium conditions.

Previously, we reported that endoplasmic reticulum calcium stores were a direct target for paclitaxel initiation of apoptosis. Furthermore, the actions of paclitaxel attenuated Bcl-2 resistance to apoptosis through endoplasmic reticulum-mediated calcium release. To better understand the calcium-regulated mechanisms of paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells, we investigated the role of extracellular calcium, specifically; whether influx of extracellular calcium contributed to and/or was necessary for paclitaxel-induced apoptosis. Our results demonstrated that paclitaxel induced extracellular calcium influx. This mobilization of extracellular calcium contributed to subsequent cytosolic calcium elevation differently, depending on dosage. Under normal extracellular calcium conditions, high dose paclitaxel induced apoptosis-promoting calcium influx, which did not occur in calcium-free conditions. In the absence of extracellular calcium an "Enhanced Calcium Efflux" mechanism in which high dose paclitaxel stimulated calcium efflux immediately, leading to dramatic cytosolic calcium decrease, was observed. In the absence of extracellular calcium, high dose paclitaxel's stimulatory effects on capacitative calcium entry and apoptosis could not be completely restored. Thus, normal extracellular calcium concentrations are critical for high dose paclitaxel-induced apoptosis. In contrast, low dose paclitaxel mirrored controls, indicating that it occurs independent of extracellular calcium. Thus, extracellular calcium conditions only affect efficacy of high dose paclitaxel-induced apoptosis.