ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID-19 vaccination has proved to be effective to prevent symptomatic infection and severe disease even in immunocompromised patients including liver transplant patients. We aim to assess the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the mortality and development of severe and critical disease in our center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of LT patients in a reference center between March 2020 and February 2022. Demographic data, cirrhosis etiology, time on liver transplantation, immunosuppressive therapies, and vaccination status were recorded at the time of diagnosis. Primary outcome was death due to COVID-19, and secondary outcomes included the development of severe COVID-19 and intensive care unit (ICU) requirement. RESULTS: 153 of 324 LT recipients developed COVID-19, in whom the main causes of cirrhosis were HCV infection and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease. The vaccines used were BNT162b2 (48.6%), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (21.6%), mRNA-1273 vaccine (1.4%), Sputnik V (14.9%), Ad5-nCoV-S (4.1%) and CoronaVac (9.5%). Case fatality and ICU requirement risk were similar among vaccinated and unvaccinated LT patients (adjusted relative case fatality for vaccinated versus unvaccinated of 0.68, 95% CI 0.14-3.24, p = 0.62; adjusted relative risk [aRR] for ICU requirement of 0.45, 95% CI 0.11-1.88, p = 0.27). Nonetheless, vaccination was associated with a lower risk of severe disease (aRR for severe disease of 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.71, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination reduces the risk of severe COVID-19 in LT patients, regardless of the scheme used. Vaccination should be encouraged for all.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Liver Transplantation , Humans , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , BNT162 Vaccine , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Liver Cirrhosis , Mexico/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Transplant Recipients , VaccinationABSTRACT
Background: Antimalarial drugs were widely used as experimental therapies against COVID-19 in the initial stages of the pandemic. Despite multiple randomized controlled trials demonstrating unfavorable outcomes in both efficacy and adverse effects, antimalarial drugs are still prescribed in developing countries, especially in those experiencing recurrent COVID-19 crises (India and Brazil). Therefore, real-life experience and pharmacovigilance studies describing the use and side effects of antimalarials for COVID-19 in developing countries are still relevant. Objective: To describe the adverse effects associated with the use of antimalarial drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia at a reference center in Mexico City. Methods: We integrated a retrospective cohort with all adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia from March 13th, 2020, to May 17th, 2020. We compared the baseline characteristics (demographic and clinical) and the adverse effects between the groups of patients treated with and without antimalarial drugs. The mortality analysis was performed in 491 patients who received optimal care and were not transferred to other institutions (210 from the antimalarial group and 281 from the other group). Results: We included 626 patients from whom 38% (n = 235) received an antimalarial drug. The mean age was 51.2 ± 13.6 years, and 64% were males. At baseline, compared with the group treated with antimalarials, the group that did not receive antimalarials had more dyspnea (82 vs. 73%, p = 0.017) and cyanosis (5.3 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.009), higher respiratory rate (median of 28 vs. 24 bpm, p < 0.001), and lower oxygen saturation (median of 83 vs. 87%, p < 0.001). In the group treated with antimalarials, 120 patients had two EKG evaluations, from whom 12% (n = 16) prolonged their QTc from baseline in more than 50 ms, and six developed a ventricular arrhythmia. Regarding the trajectories of the liver function tests over time, no significant differences were found for the change in the mean value per day between the two groups. Among patients who received optimal care, the mortality was 16% (33/210) in those treated with antimalarials and 15% (41/281) in those not receiving antimalarials (RR 1.08, 95% 0.75-1.64, and adjusted RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.69-1.82). Conclusion: The adverse events in patients with COVID-19 treated with antimalarials were similar to those who did not receive antimalarials at institutions with rigorous pharmacological surveillance. However, they do not improve survival in patients who receive optimal medical care.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences between clinical, manometric, and neuroimmunological profile of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) and achalasia patients. METHODS: Seven EGJOO and 27 achalasia patients were enrolled in a blind cross-sectional study. Peripheral blood (PB) of 10 healthy donors and 10 lower esophageal sphincter (LES) muscle biopsies from organ transplant donors were included as controls. The presence of ganglion cells, cells of Cajal, Th22/Th7/Th2/Th1/Tregs/Bregs/pDCregs in tissue, and PB was assessed by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Serum concentration of IL-22/IL-17A/IL-17F/IL-4/IFN-γ/IL-1ß/IL-6/IL-23/IL-33/TNF-α/IL-10 was determined using bioplex plates. ANAs and antineuronal antibodies were evaluated by immunofluorescence and Western blot. KEY RESULTS: EGJOO and achalasia patients had lower ganglion cells and cells of Cajal percentage vs. controls, while fibrosis was present only in achalasia patients. EGJOO and controls had lower cell percentage of Th22/Th17/Th2 vs. achalasia. EGJOO tissue had lower Th1/Treg cell number vs. achalasia, but higher levels vs. control group. Bregs and pDCregs percentage was higher in EGJOO vs. control group. Percentage of PB subpopulations in EGJOO was not significantly different from control group. Serum cytokine levels were higher for IL-1ß/IL-6/TNF-α, while IL-17A levels were lower in EGJOO vs. achalasia and control group. EGJOO group was negative for ANAs, while in achalasia group, 54% were positive. GAD65 and PNMa/Ta2 antibodies were present in achalasia, whereas Yo and recoverin were positive in EGJOO group. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Although EGJOO shares some clinical characteristics with achalasia, the neuroimmunological profile is completely different, suggesting that EGJOO might be a different entity.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophageal Motility Disorders/diagnosis , Esophagogastric Junction/metabolism , Esophagus/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cytokines/blood , Esophageal Achalasia/metabolism , Esophageal Motility Disorders/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , Manometry , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Granulomas are circumscribed lesions mainly composed of mononuclear cells that arise in response to poorly degradable antigenic stimuli. They are found in 2-15 % of liver biopsies and the meaning of their finding can range from an incidental phenomenon to the manifestation of a systemic disease of infectious, autoimmune or neoplastic origin. Clinical presentation usually points at the underlying pathology; however, the list of associated conditions is extensive, and differs based on patient epidemiological history and baseline characteristics. The most useful element for their study is a thorough medical history, with an emphasis on recent trips, exposures and consumption of drugs or raw or exotic foods. Detailed histopathological analysis may help identify the etiology. For example, the presence of epithelioid granulomas with caseous necrosis indicates tuberculosis and, its absence, sarcoidosis; eosinophil abundance can be associated with drug reactions or parasitic infections; and the presence of foreign bodies can be the cause of granulomatous liver disease (GLD). In this article, we describe the basic clinical-pathological aspects of GLD, and provide a brief summary of the most common etiologies, with an emphasis on the Latin-American region.
Los granulomas son lesiones circunscritas compuestas principalmente por células mononucleares que surgen en respuesta a estímulos antigénicos pobremente degradables. Se encuentran en 2 a 15 % de las biopsias hepáticas; su hallazgo puede significar desde un fenómeno incidental, hasta la manifestación de una enfermedad sistémica de origen infeccioso, autoinmune o neoplásico. El cuadro clínico suele apuntar a la patología subyacente, sin embargo, la lista de condiciones asociadas es amplia y difiere con base en los antecedentes epidemiológicos y a las características basales del paciente. El elemento de mayor utilidad para su estudio es la historia clínica exhaustiva, con énfasis en viajes recientes, exposición de riesgo y consumo de fármacos o alimentos crudos o exóticos. El análisis histopatológico detallado puede auxiliar en la identificación de la etiología, por ejemplo, la presencia de granulomas epitelioides con necrosis caseosa indica tuberculosis y su ausencia, sarcoidosis; la abundancia de eosinófilos es señal de reacciones farmacológicas o infecciones parasitarias; la presencia de cuerpos extraños puede ser la causa de la enfermedad granulomatosa hepática. En este artículo describimos los aspectos clínico-patológicos básicos de esta enfermedad y proveemos un breve resumen de las etiologías más comunes, principalmente en la región de Latinoamérica.
Subject(s)
Granuloma/diagnosis , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Biopsy/methods , Diagnosis, Differential , Granuloma/physiopathology , Humans , Liver Diseases/physiopathology , Sarcoidosis/complications , Sarcoidosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/diagnosisABSTRACT
Resumen Los granulomas son lesiones circunscritas compuestas principalmente por células mononucleares que surgen en respuesta a estímulos antigénicos pobremente degradables. Se encuentran en 2 a 15 % de las biopsias hepáticas; su hallazgo puede significar desde un fenómeno incidental, hasta la manifestación de una enfermedad sistémica de origen infeccioso, autoinmune o neoplásico. El cuadro clínico suele apuntar a la patología subyacente, sin embargo, la lista de condiciones asociadas es amplia y difiere con base en los antecedentes epidemiológicos y a las características basales del paciente. El elemento de mayor utilidad para su estudio es la historia clínica exhaustiva, con énfasis en viajes recientes, exposición de riesgo y consumo de fármacos o alimentos crudos o exóticos. El análisis histopatológico detallado puede auxiliar en la identificación de la etiología, por ejemplo, la presencia de granulomas epitelioides con necrosis caseosa indica tuberculosis y su ausencia, sarcoidosis; la abundancia de eosinófilos es señal de reacciones farmacológicas o infecciones parasitarias; la presencia de cuerpos extraños puede ser la causa de la enfermedad granulomatosa hepática. En este artículo describimos los aspectos clínico-patológicos básicos de esta enfermedad y proveemos un breve resumen de las etiologías más comunes, principalmente en la región de Latinoamérica.
Abstract Granulomas are circumscribed lesions mainly composed of mononuclear cells that arise in response to poorly degradable antigenic stimuli. They are found in 2-15 % of liver biopsies and the meaning of their finding can range from an incidental phenomenon to the manifestation of a systemic disease of infectious, autoimmune or neoplastic origin. Clinical presentation usually points at the underlying pathology; however, the list of associated conditions is extensive, and differs based on patient epidemiological history and baseline characteristics. The most useful element for their study is a thorough medical history, with an emphasis on recent trips, exposures and consumption of drugs or raw or exotic foods. Detailed histopathological analysis may help identify the etiology. For example, the presence of epithelioid granulomas with caseous necrosis indicates tuberculosis and, its absence, sarcoidosis; eosinophil abundance can be associated with drug reactions or parasitic infections; and the presence of foreign bodies can be the cause of granulomatous liver disease (GLD). In this article, we describe the basic clinical-pathological aspects of GLD, and provide a brief summary of the most common etiologies, with an emphasis on the Latin-American region.
Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Granuloma/diagnosis , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Sarcoidosis/complications , Sarcoidosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Biopsy/methods , Diagnosis, Differential , Granuloma/physiopathology , Liver Diseases/physiopathologyABSTRACT
We compared the chemokine/receptor expression in skin biopsies of discoid (SLE/DLE) and subacute lupus (SLE/SCLE) and correlated it with tissue and circulating effector CD4 T cells/regulatory cells. Skin biopsies and peripheral blood from 9 active SLE/DLE patients, 9 SLE/SCLE patients, 5 control SLE patients without cutaneous lesions and 10 control healthy donors were included. Clinical skin activity was measured by Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index scoring, and systemic activity was measured by a modified SLEDAI-2K excluding the cutaneous items. Pain and pruritus were evaluated by a 10-point visual analogue scale. To determine the frequencies of CXCL-10/CXCR3-, CCL2/CCR2-, CCL17/CCR4-, CCL20/CCR6-, CCL27/CCR10-, CXCL8/CXCR1-, CXCL13/CXCR5-, IL-22-, CD4/IL-17A-, CD4/IL-4-, CD4/IFN-γ-, CD123/IDO-, CD25/Foxp3-, and CD20/IL-10-expressing cells, double immunostaining procedures were performed. Circulating CD4+/CD161-/IL-22+, CD4+/CD161+/IL-17+, CD4+/CD25-/IL-4+, CD4+/CD25-/IFN-γ+, CD4+/CD25hi/Foxp3+, CD3+/CD19+/CD38hi/IL-10+, and CD123+/CD196+/IDOâ¯+â¯cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: In the tissue, CXCL10, CXCR5, and CCL20 expression and IL-22+, CD4+/IL-17+, CD4+/IFN-γâ¯+â¯and CD123+/IDOâ¯+â¯cell percentages were increased in SLE/DLE versus SLE/SCLE. Circulating CD4+/CD161-/IL-22+, CD4+/CD161+/IL-17+, CD4+/CD25-/IFN-γ+, CD19+/CD38hi/IL-10â¯+â¯and CD123+/CD196+/IDOâ¯+â¯cell percentages were higher in SLE/DLE versus SLE/SCLE. In the tissue, we found positive correlations between CXCR3 and CD4+/IL-17â¯+â¯cells; CCR2 and CD4+/IFN-γâ¯+â¯cells; and CCR10 and CD123+/IDOâ¯+â¯cells in the SLE/DLE patients and between CXCL13 and CD20+/IL-10â¯+â¯cells in the SLE/SCLE patients. In the peripheral blood, we determined positive correlations between CXCR5 and CD4+/CD25-/IFN-γâ¯+â¯cells; CCL17 and CD4+/CD161-/IL-22â¯+â¯cells; and CCL17 and CD4+/CD161+/IL-17â¯+â¯cells in the SLE/DLE patients and between CXCR5 and CD3+/CD19+/CD38hi/IL-10â¯+â¯cells; CCR2 and CD4+/CD25hi/Foxp3â¯+â¯cells; and CXCR1 and CD4+/CD25hi/Foxp3â¯+â¯cells in the SLE/SCLE patients. Positive correlations between the pain score and the expression of CCL2 and CCR6 expression were found in the SLE/SCLE patients. In conclusion, the correlations between the expression of chemokines/receptors and subpopulations of effector/regulatory cells showed differential responses among the cutaneous pathologies.
Subject(s)
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Chemokines/immunology , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/immunology , Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid/immunology , Skin/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
Idiopathic achalasia is a relatively infrequent esophageal motor disorder for which major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes are well-identified risk factors. However, no information about HLA-achalasia susceptibility in Mexicans has previously been reported. We studied a group of 91 patients diagnosed with achalasia and 234 healthy controls with Mexican admixed ancestry. HLA alleles and conserved extended haplotypes were analyzed using high-resolution HLA typing based on Sanger and next-generation sequencing technologies. Admixture estimates were determined using HLA-B and short tandem repeats. Results were analyzed by non-parametric statistical analysis and Bonferroni correction. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Patients with achalasia had 56.7% Native American genes, 24.7% European genes, 16.5% African genes and 2.0% Asian genes, which was comparable with the estimates in the controls. Significant increases in the frequencies of alleles DRB1*14:54 and DQB1*05:03 and the extended haplotypes DRB1*14:54-DQB1*05:03 and DRB1*11:01-DQB1*03:01, even after Bonferroni correction (pC<0.05), were found in the achalasia group compared to those in the controls. Concluding, the HLA class II alleles HLA-DRB1*14:54:01 and DQB1*05:03:01 and the extended haplotype are risk factors for achalasia in mixed-ancestry Mexican individuals. These results also suggest that the HLA-DRB1*14:54-DQB1*05:03 haplotype was introduced by admixture with European and/or Asian populations.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/genetics , Ethnicity/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetics, Population , HLA-DQ beta-Chains/genetics , HLA-DRB1 Chains/genetics , Haplotypes , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Esophageal Achalasia/epidemiology , Female , Genetic Variation , Humans , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Idiopathic achalasia is a rare esophageal motor disorder. The disease state manifests local and systemic inflammation, and it appears that an autoimmune component and specific autoantibodies participate in the pathogenesis. The study aims to determine the prevalence of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases in patients with achalasia and compare the results with those from patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: It was a cross-sectional and included 114 patients with idiopathic achalasia and 114 age-matched and sex-matched control patients with GERD. Data on the presence of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, the time of presentation, and any family history of autoimmune disease were obtained from the hospital's medical records. RESULTS: Seventy three (64%) were female patients (mean age: 42.3 ± 15.5; median disease duration: 12 months). We identified the presence of autoimmune disease in 19 patients with achalasia (16.7%), hypothyroidism was the main diagnosis, and it was present in 52.6% of patients compared with 4.2% in controls. Thirteen of the 19 achalasia patients (68.4%) with autoimmune disease had history of familial autoimmunity. We identified 11 achalasia (9.6%) and 5 GERD patients (4.16%) with an inflammatory condition. Compared with the GERD, the achalasia group was 3.8 times more likely to have an autoimmune disease (95% CI: 1.47-9.83), 3.0 times more likely to have thyroidopathies (95% CI: 1.00-9.03), and 3.02 times more likely to suffer from any chronic inflammatory disease (95% CI: 1.65-6.20). CONCLUSIONS: The non-negligible number of patients with autoimmune diseases identified among the patients with idiopathic achalasia supports the hypothesis that achalasia has an autoimmune component.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Esophageal Achalasia/epidemiology , Adult , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , PrevalenceABSTRACT
Recent studies have shown that overweight and obesity play an important role in the development of osteoarthritis (OA). However, joint overload is not the only risk factor in this disease. For instance, the presence of OA in non-weight-bearing joints such as the hand suggests that metabolic factors may also contribute to its pathogenesis. Recently, white adipose tissue (WAT) has been recognized not only as an energy reservoir but also as an important secretory organ of adipokines. In this regard, adipokines have been closely associated with obesity and also play an important role in bone and cartilage homeostasis. Furthermore, drugs such as rosuvastatin or rosiglitazone have demonstrated chondroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects in cartilage explants from patients with OA. Thus, it seems that adipokines are important factors linking obesity, adiposity, and inflammation in OA. In this review, we are focused on establishing the physiological mechanisms of adipokines on cartilage homeostasis and evaluating their role in the pathophysiology of OA based on evidence derived from experimental research as well as from clinical-epidemiological studies.