Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Biotechniques ; 74(2): 101-106, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36847200

ABSTRACT

Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae are leading causes of meningitis and acute invasive infections. PCR-based methods are widely used for the diagnosis and surveillance of bacterial pathogens because of their high sensitivity, specificity and high-throughput capabilities compared with conventional laboratory methods. This study evaluated a high-resolution melting qualitative PCR analysis method for the simultaneous detection of these three pathogens. The assay has been optimized to detect three species-specific genes of each organism isolated from clinical samples, enabling accurate identification of the etiological agent. The method proved to be highly sensitive and cheaper than the real-time PCR TaqMan® system because it is probe-free; it could be used for the diagnosis of invasive diseases in public health laboratories of developing countries.


Subject(s)
Meningitis, Bacterial , Neisseria meningitidis , Humans , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Meningitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Meningitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Neisseria meningitidis/genetics , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Infect Genet Evol ; 78: 104079, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31669441

ABSTRACT

Meningococcal disease is a devastating infection caused by Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus), and it is classified into serogroups according to its polysaccharide capsule composition. In Brazil, serogroup C is the most frequently responsible for the majority of cases, representing a serious public health challenge. In 2010, the meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine was included in the calendar of the National Immunization Program. We have evaluated 163 meningococcal isolates collected during the pre (2006-2010) and post (2011-2016) vaccination periods. Epidemiological data were determined through Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) analysis, vaccine antigens and Bexsero Antigen Sequence Typing (BAST) variant. Clonal complex 103 remains the most prevalent in the country with a high number of serogroup C strains to which CC103 is directly associated. A total of 42 different ST were found. The two most prevalent ST were ST-3780 (CC103) with 38 strains and ST-10781, which was not associated with a CC with nine strains. Allele abcZ-276 was reported among 98% of the strains analyzed and it was not found among other CC103 strains worldwide, makes this allele an important genetic marker for a specific new clone only assigned to Brazilian serogroup C strains, ST-3780. FHbp-25 and NHBA-42 peptides were the most prevalent among isolates in both periods studied. BAST-824 and BAST-3073 have been expressed only in CC103 over the studied years, however, it was not possible to associate a BAST variant to a specific CC. Serogroup C phenotype [P1.22,14-6,36-2: F3-9: ST-3780 (CC103)] was the most prevalent according to the antigenic profiles of circulating strains in Brazil (2007-2016). Our study suggests that CC103 is still a major hypervirulent CC circulating in Brazil and ST-3780 is currently spreading all over the country even after the introduction of MenC in 2010.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Meningococcal Infections/prevention & control , Meningococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Multilocus Sequence Typing/methods , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup C/classification , Antibodies, Bacterial/metabolism , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Brazil , Genetic Variation , Humans , Meningococcal Infections/immunology , Meningococcal Vaccines/genetics , Meningococcal Vaccines/immunology , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup C/genetics , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup C/immunology , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup C/isolation & purification , Phylogeny , Population Surveillance , Serogroup
3.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 20(4): 335-341, July-Aug. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-828119

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background Several in-house PCR-based assays have been described for the detection of bacterial meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae from clinical samples. PCR-based methods targeting different bacterial genes are frequently used by different laboratories worldwide, but no standard method has ever been established. The aim of our study was to compare different in-house and a commercial PCR-based tests for the detection of bacterial pathogens causing meningitis and invasive disease in humans. Methods A total of 110 isolates and 134 clinical samples (99 cerebrospinal fluid and 35 blood samples) collected from suspected cases of invasive disease were analyzed. Specific sets of primers frequently used for PCR-diagnosis of the three pathogens were used and compared with the results achieved using the multiplex approach described here. Several different gene targets were used for each microorganism, namely ctrA, crgA and nspA for N. meningitidis, ply for S. pneumoniae, P6 and bexA for H. influenzae. Results All used methods were fast, specific and sensitive, while some of the targets used for the in-house PCR assay detected lower concentrations of genomic DNA than the commercial method. An additional PCR reaction is described for the differentiation of capsulated and non-capsulated H. influenzae strains, the while commercial method only detects capsulated strains. Conclusions The in-house PCR methods here compared showed to be rapid, sensitive, highly specific, and cheaper than commercial methods. The in-house PCR methods could be easily adopted by public laboratories of developing countries for diagnostic purposes. The best results were achieved using primers targeting the genes nspA, ply, and P6 which were able to detect the lowest DNA concentrations for each specific target.


Subject(s)
Humans , Haemophilus influenzae/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Meningitis, Haemophilus/diagnosis , Meningitis, Meningococcal/diagnosis , Meningitis, Pneumococcal/diagnosis , Neisseria meningitidis/isolation & purification , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Haemophilus influenzae/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , DNA Primers , Meningitis, Haemophilus/microbiology , Meningitis, Meningococcal/microbiology , Meningitis, Pneumococcal/microbiology , Neisseria meningitidis/genetics
4.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 20(4): 335-41, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27256956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several in-house PCR-based assays have been described for the detection of bacterial meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae from clinical samples. PCR-based methods targeting different bacterial genes are frequently used by different laboratories worldwide, but no standard method has ever been established. The aim of our study was to compare different in-house and a commercial PCR-based tests for the detection of bacterial pathogens causing meningitis and invasive disease in humans. METHODS: A total of 110 isolates and 134 clinical samples (99 cerebrospinal fluid and 35 blood samples) collected from suspected cases of invasive disease were analyzed. Specific sets of primers frequently used for PCR-diagnosis of the three pathogens were used and compared with the results achieved using the multiplex approach described here. Several different gene targets were used for each microorganism, namely ctrA, crgA and nspA for N. meningitidis, ply for S. pneumoniae, P6 and bexA for H. influenzae. RESULTS: All used methods were fast, specific and sensitive, while some of the targets used for the in-house PCR assay detected lower concentrations of genomic DNA than the commercial method. An additional PCR reaction is described for the differentiation of capsulated and non-capsulated H. influenzae strains, the while commercial method only detects capsulated strains. CONCLUSIONS: The in-house PCR methods here compared showed to be rapid, sensitive, highly specific, and cheaper than commercial methods. The in-house PCR methods could be easily adopted by public laboratories of developing countries for diagnostic purposes. The best results were achieved using primers targeting the genes nspA, ply, and P6 which were able to detect the lowest DNA concentrations for each specific target.


Subject(s)
Haemophilus influenzae/isolation & purification , Meningitis, Haemophilus/diagnosis , Meningitis, Meningococcal/diagnosis , Meningitis, Pneumococcal/diagnosis , Neisseria meningitidis/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , DNA Primers , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Haemophilus influenzae/genetics , Humans , Meningitis, Haemophilus/microbiology , Meningitis, Meningococcal/microbiology , Meningitis, Pneumococcal/microbiology , Neisseria meningitidis/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...