Ictal crying in epileptic seizures and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: What are the hints to differentiate them?

OBJECTIVES: Ictal crying (IC) is a quite rare semiological manifestation of epileptic seizures (ESs) and it has been mostly reported in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs). However, labeling IC as a pathognomonic sign of PNES can be harmful. We first aimed to investigate IC frequency in ES and PNES and highlight the differences of IC between ES and PNES. Secondly, we aimed to analyze etiology, detailed semiology, treatment options, and outcome of patients with IC in ES in more detail. METHODS: We retrospectively screened all video-EEG monitoring unit reports from Hacettepe University Hospitals' Epilepsy Center over a 20-year period (1996-2017) for the diagnosis of IC. We included the patients with IC who had at least one documented seizure. Patients who had IC with both facial expression and vocalization compatible with crying with or without weeping and subjective feeling of sadness, were included in the study. We classified patients with IC as ES and PNES. Demographic, historical, clinical, neuroimaging, electrophysiological parameters, video-EEG data, treatment options, and prognosis of all patients were recorded. Demographic, clinical, and video-EEG data were compared between ES and PNES. RESULTS: During the study period, 1983 patients were investigated. Six patients (all female) with ES and 37 patients (33 female) with PNES were identified. When we compared patients with PNES and ES with IC, the number of ASMs taken and duration of disease were significantly higher in patients with ES than PNES. Longer duration of seizure, longer duration of crying component, late onset of crying component in seizure, early responsiveness after seizure, not occurring during sleep, accompanied by eye closure and weeping, were found significantly higher in patients with PNES. Besides, if we analyze ES group in more detail, all had medical treatment refractory focal epilepsy and two of them whose IC was seen as an early semiological manifestation of their seizures had good outcome after nondominant anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL)+amygdalohippocampectomy (AH). However, three patients had various cortical lesions apart from temporal lobe on MRI and one patient had focal epilepsy with frontal lobe semiology with negative MRI. CONCLUSION: Although the most common etiology for IC is PNES and it is rarely seen in ES, it can be harmful to label ictal crying as a pathognomonic sign for PNES. We proposed that there are some semiological differences in terms of IC between PNES and ES. These differences may help to distinguish IC in PNES and ES in daily practice. Moreover, it can be speculated that nondominant temporal lobe involvement may be associated with IC in ES.

SREDA: A Rare but Confusing Benign EEG Variant.

INTRODUCTION: Subclinical rhythmic EEG discharges in adults (SREDA) is a very rare benign EEG pattern. The electrophysiological features and atypical variants of SREDA has wide spectrum and they are poorly known. It resembles ictal discharges, and overinterpretation of SREDA may lead to misdiagnosis of epilepsy. Herein, we aimed to report patients with SREDA to identify the frequency and characterized clinical, demographic, electrophysiological features. METHODS: We reviewed 22,234 EEG reports that are reported by the same experienced clinical neurophysiologists, between 2012 and 2018. The EEGs with SREDA were reevaluated blindly by three clinical neurophysiologists. The demographic, clinical characteristics, and neuroimaging features of the patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Subclinical rhythmic EEG discharges in adults was present in 14 EEG records (0.06%), in nine patients. The mean age of patients was 52.1 ± 17.7 (range, 21-71) years. The patients had been diagnosed with several neurologic diseases, including cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, mental retardation, Alzheimer disease, and transient global amnesia. One patient had unilateral lesion, in whom SREDA had appeared on contralateral side of the lesion, whereas other patients with normal or nonlateralized lesions had SREDA bilaterally and symmetrical. This variant had been misdiagnosed as an ictal discharge in previous EEGs in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that SREDA is difficult to associate with any specific condition. The pathophysiology of SREDA can not be explained by a single mechanism. Even if it is mostly observed in older adults, it is also observed in young adults in this study. It is important to differentiate SREDA from ictal discharge to prevent misdiagnosis of epilepsy especially in nonepileptic paroxysmal events.