ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Strongyloidiasis is a nematode infection caused by Strongyloides stercoralis. Previous studies have addressed the possibility of the parasite to establish a complex relationship with the host that could affect the risk of developing diabetes mellitus or modify its presentation. This study aims to evaluate the potential impact of strongyloidiasis in diabetes mellitus and other metabolic diseases. METHODS: Case-control observational retrospective study that included 95 S. stercoralis-infected patients and 83 non-infected individuals. Epidemiological and clinical variables were retrieved from medical records, and a statistical analysis was carried out to explore any association between strongyloidiasis and diabetes mellitus and other metabolic diseases. RESULTS: Most of the patients were men (99, 55.60%) with a mean age of 42.53 ± SD 14 years. Twelve (6.70%) patients were diabetic; 30 (16.90%) presented arterial hypertension; 28 (15.70%) had dyslipidaemia; and 10 (5.60%) had thyroid pathology. When comparing patients with strongyloidiasis and uninfected patients, no differences were found regarding diabetes mellitus or other metabolic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in the present study do not confirm any type of association between strongyloidiasis and diabetes mellitus or other metabolic diseases.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Strongyloides stercoralis , Strongyloidiasis , Adult , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Case-Control Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and epidemiological profile of immunosuppressed patients with imported strongyloidiasis in a non-endemic setting, and to compare these results with non-immunosuppressed patients. This is a case-control substudy from a larger observational retrospective study that included all patients with strongyloidiasis registered in the +REDIVI Spanish Collaborative Network. Overall, 1245 patients with imported strongyloidiasis were included. From these, 80 (6.4%) patients had some kind of immunosuppression. Three (3.8%) patients had a hyperinfection syndrome, and 34 (52.3%) patients had eosinophilia. The percentages of positive results of the formalin-ether technique, the fecal culture and serology were 12.3%, 21.1% and 95.4%, respectively. When comparing the main characteristics, immunosuppressed patients had higher proportion of severe clinical manifestations and lower proportion of eosinophilia. No differences were found regarding yield of microbiological techniques and treatment response. These results stress the importance of strongyloidiasis screening among immunosuppressed patients coming from endemic areas. Serological tests have an acceptable sensitivity to be used as a screening tool.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilia , Immunocompromised Host , Strongyloidiasis , Animals , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Strongyloides stercoralis , Strongyloidiasis/diagnosis , Strongyloidiasis/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To provide information regarding the prevalence of strongyloidiasis among migrants coming from Strongyloides stercoralis-endemic areas who reside in Spain. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies showing prevalence of S. stercoralis infection among migrants from Latin America, Africa, Eastern Europe, Asia and Oceania who reside in Spain. We included articles published until 30 April 2019 without language restriction. The keywords used for the search included 'Strongyloides stercoralis', 'strongyloidiasis', 'Spain', 'screening' and 'migrants'. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included in the review and meta-analysis, comprising 12 386 screened people. Eleven studies (7020 patients) evaluated the presence of S. stercoralis infection only through investigation of larvae in faeces, showing an overall prevalence of 1% (95%CI 1-1%). Thirteen studies (5366 patients) used a serological test, showing an overall prevalence of 14% (95%CI 11-17%). Strongyloidiasis seroprevalence was 20% (95%CI 15-24%) among migrants from sub-Saharan Africa, 14% (95%CI 10-18%) among those from Latin America and 8% (95%CI 5-11%) among migrants from North Africa. CONCLUSIONS: Migrants coming from strongyloidiasis-endemic areas living in Spain had a high S. stercoralis infection prevalence, particularly those from sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. This population should be screened using serology as the most sensitive test for S. stercoralis infection. This could be easily implemented at primary care level.
OBJECTIFS: Fournir des informations sur la prévalence de la strongyloïdose parmi les migrants résidant en Espagne et provenant de zones endémiques pour Strongyloides stercoralis. MÉTHODES: Revue systématique de la littérature et méta-analyse des études montrant la prévalence de l'infection à S. stercoralis parmi les migrants d'Amérique latine, d'Afrique, d'Europe de l'Est, d'Asie et d'Océanie qui résident en Espagne. Nous avons inclus des articles publiés jusqu'au 30 avril e 2019 sans restriction de langue. Les mots clés utilisés pour la recherche comprenaient "Strongyloides stercoralis", "strongyloïdose", "Espagne", "dépistage" et "migrants". RÉSULTATS: Vingt-quatre études ont été incluses dans la revue et la méta-analyse, comprenant 12.386 personnes dépistées. Onze études (7.020 patients) ont évalué la présence d'une infection à S. stercoralis uniquement en examinant les larves dans les selles, montrant une prévalence globale de 1% (IC95%: 1-1%). Treize études (5.366 patients) ont utilisé un test sérologique, montrant une prévalence globale de 14% (IC95%: 11-17%). La séroprévalence de la strongyloïdose était de 20% (IC95%: 15-24%) chez les migrants d'Afrique subsaharienne, 14% (IC95%: 10-18%) chez ceux d'Amérique latine et 8% (IC95%: 5-11%) chez ceux d'Afrique du Nord. CONCLUSIONS: Les migrants en provenance de zones d'endémie pour la strongyloïdose vivant en Espagne avaient une prévalence élevée d'infection à S. stercoralis, en particulier ceux d'Afrique subsaharienne et d'Amérique latine. Cette population devrait être dépistée en utilisant la sérologie comme le test le plus sensible pour l' infection à S. stercoralis. Cela pourrait être facilement mis en Åuvre au niveau des soins primaires.