Retrospective cohort study on radial head replacements comparing results between smooth and porous stem designs.

BACKGROUND: When necessary, radial head integrity after a fracture can be re-created by the use of a radial head arthroplasty if the radial head is judged irreparable. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of metal modular radial head replacements with a smooth vs. a porous stem. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of radial head replacements performed in the first 4 weeks after a trauma in an adult patient at our institution between 2000 and 2014 was completed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a porous stem group (ExploR; Biomet Orthopedics, Warsaw, IN, USA) and a smooth stem group (EVOLVE; Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN, USA). Primary outcomes were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Mayo Elbow Performance Index scores. Secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale score for pain, range of motion, grip strength, and radiographic evaluations. RESULTS: Of the 80 eligible patients, 57 agreed to participate (porous stem group, 36; smooth stem group, 21). Demographic data were similar between the 2 groups. Average follow-up was 6.3 years. Average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Mayo Elbow Performance Index scores were similar between the 2 groups. Porous implants were more prone to osteolysis (64.3% vs. 23.5%; P = .01) and were associated with a greater loss of elbow flexion (6° vs. 1°; P = .02). The porous stem group showed a tendency toward more overstuffing (24.0% vs. 5.9%; P = .21). CONCLUSION: Our results reveal that outcomes between smooth and porous stem metal modular radial head implants are equivalent. However, the smooth stem implant may represent the preferred option as it is associated with a lower rate of complications.

Neurotensin in the nucleus accumbens reverses dopamine supersensitivity evoked by antipsychotic treatment.

Long-term exposure to antipsychotics like haloperidol can increase sensitivity to dopamine agonist stimulation. This could contribute to treatment failure and increase relapse to psychosis. Chronic antipsychotic treatment elevates neurotensin levels in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), where the neuropeptide modulates dopamine function by signalling through NTS1 receptors. We hypothesized that increasing neurotensin activity in the NAc attenuates the expression of antipsychotic-induced dopamine supersensitivity, which is indicated by a potentiated psychomotor response to amphetamine. Rats received either continuous (CONT-HAL; achieved via subcutaneous osmotic minipump) or intermittent (INT-HAL; achieved via daily subcutaneous injection) haloperidol treatment for 16-17 days. Three to 5 days later, we injected neurotensin into the NAc and measured amphetamine-induced locomotion. Only CONT-HAL rats showed potentiated amphetamine-induced locomotion, indicating dopamine supersensitivity. Compared to intra-NAc saline, intra-NAc neurotensin suppressed amphetamine-induced locomotion in CONT-HAL rats, but not in INT-HAL or control rats. In a new cohort of CONT-HAL and INT-HAL rats, we measured striatal levels of proneurotensin mRNA and NTS1 receptors. The two treatments led to overlapping but also distinct neurochemical profiles. Neither treatment altered NTS1 receptor levels in the NAc, but both increased proneurotensin mRNA levels in the NAc core. In the caudate-putamen, only INT-HAL increased NTS1 receptor levels, while only CONT-HAL increased proneurotensin mRNA expression. Thus, antipsychotic-induced dopamine supersensitivity enhances the ability of neurotensin in the NAc to regulate dopamine-mediated behaviours, and this likely does not involve changes in local levels of NTS1 receptors or proneurotensin mRNA. We conclude that increasing neurotensin activity could be considered to attenuate antipsychotic-induced dopamine supersensitivity.

Antipsychotic treatment leading to dopamine supersensitivity persistently alters nucleus accumbens function.

Chronic exposure to some antipsychotic medications can induce supersensitivity to dopamine receptor stimulation. This is linked to a worsening of clinical outcome and to antipsychotic treatment failure. Here we investigated the role of striatal subregions [nucleus accumbens (NAc) and caudate-putamen (CPu)] in the expression of antipsychotic-induced dopamine supersensitivity. We treated rats with haloperidol (HAL) or olanzapine (OLZ), using regimens that achieve clinically relevant kinetics of striatal D2 receptor occupancy. Under these conditions, HAL produces dopamine supersensitivity whereas OLZ does not. We then assessed behaviors evoked by the dopamine agonist amphetamine (AMPH). We either injected AMPH into the striatum or inhibited striatal function with microinjections of GABA receptor agonists prior to injecting AMPH systemically. HAL-treated rats were dopamine supersensitive, as indicated by sensitization to systemic AMPH-induced potentiation of both locomotor activity and operant responding for a conditioned reward (CR). Intra-CPu injections of AMPH had no effect on these behaviors, in any group. Intra-NAc injections of AMPH enhanced operant responding for CR in OLZ-treated and control rats, but not in HAL-treated rats. In HAL-treated rats, inhibition of the NAc also failed to disrupt systemic AMPH-induced potentiation of operant responding for CR. Furthermore, while intra-NAc AMPH enhanced locomotion in both HAL-treated and control animals, inhibition of the NAc disrupted systemic AMPH-induced locomotion only in control rats. Thus, antipsychotic-induced dopamine supersensitivity persistently disrupts NAc function, such that some behaviors that normally depend upon NAc dopamine no longer do so. This has implications for understanding dysfunctions in dopamine-mediated behaviors in patients undergoing chronic antipsychotic treatment.

Incipient malunion of an isolated humeral trochlea fracture treated with an elbow hemiarthroplasty: case report.

We report the case of a 49-year-old woman with severe elbow ankylosis 10 weeks after a trochlea fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Imaging confirmed failure of open reduction and internal fixation with a displaced and severely damaged trochlea. We treated the nascent malunited trochlea and associated elbow ankylosis with a distal humeral hemiarthroplasty and circumferential elbow arthrolysis. The patient regained functional range of motion of the elbow and had minimal pain. Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty, which has been indicated for acute fractures involving the capitellum or the entire distal humerus, may also be indicated for certain isolated complex fractures of the trochlea.

Prior haloperidol, but not olanzapine, exposure augments the pursuit of reward cues: implications for substance abuse in schizophrenia.

Drug abuse and addiction are excessively common in schizophrenia. Chronic antipsychotic treatment might contribute to this comorbidity by inducing supersensitivity within the brain's dopamine system. Dopamine supersensitivity can enhance the incentive motivational properties of reward cues, and reward cues contribute to the maintenance and severity of drug addiction. We have shown previously that rats withdrawn from continuous haloperidol (HAL) treatment (via subcutaneous minipump) develop dopamine supersensitivity and pursue reward cues more vigorously than HAL-naive rats following an amphetamine (AMPH) challenge. Atypical antipsychotic drugs are thought to be less likely than typicals to produce dopamine supersensitivity. Thus, we compared the effects of HAL and the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine (OLZ) on the pursuit of reward cues. Rats were trained to associate a light-tone cue with water then treated with HAL or OLZ. Following antipsychotic withdrawal, we assessed AMPH-induced enhancement of lever pressing for the cue. Withdrawal from HAL, but not from OLZ, enhanced this effect. HAL, but not OLZ, also enhanced AMPH-induced psychomotor activation and c-fos mRNA expression in the caudate-putamen. Thus, prior HAL, but not OLZ, enhanced conditioned reward following an AMPH challenge, and this was potentially linked to enhanced behavioral sensitivity to AMPH and AMPH-induced engagement of the caudate-putamen. These findings suggest that HAL, but not an atypical like OLZ, modifies reward circuitry in ways that increase responsiveness to reward cues. Because enhanced responsiveness to reward cues can promote drug-seeking behavior, it should be investigated whether atypical antipsychotics might be a preferential option in schizophrenic patients at risk for drug abuse or addiction.

Continuous, but not intermittent, antipsychotic drug delivery intensifies the pursuit of reward cues.

Chronic exposure to antipsychotic medications can persistently change brain dopamine systems. Most studies on the functional significance of these neural changes have focused on motor behavior and few have addressed how long-term antipsychotic treatment might influence dopamine-mediated reward function. We asked, therefore, whether a clinically relevant antipsychotic treatment regimen would alter the incentive motivational properties of a reward cue. We assessed the ability of a Pavlovian-conditioned stimulus to function as a conditioned reward, as well as to elicit approach behavior in rats treated with haloperidol, either continuously (achieved via subcutaneous osmotic minipump) or intermittently (achieved via daily subcutaneous injections). Continuous, but not intermittent, treatment enhanced the ability of amphetamine to potentiate the conditioned reinforcing effects of a cue associated with water. This effect was not related to differences in the ability to attribute predictive value to a conditioned stimulus (as measured by conditioned approach behavior), but was potentially linked to the development of behavioral supersensitivity to amphetamine and to augmented amphetamine-induced immediate early-gene expression (c-fos and Nur77) in dorsal striatopallidal and striatonigral cells. By enhancing the ability of reward cues to control behavior and by intensifying dopamine-mediated striatopallidal and striatonigral cell activity, standard (ie, continuous) antipsychotic treatment regimens might exacerbate drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior in schizophrenia. Achieving regular but transiently high antipsychotic levels in the brain (as modeled in the intermittent condition) might be a viable option to prevent these changes. This possibility should be explored in the clinic.