Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training conditions and education in oncologic disciplines: a survey-based analysis.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in global health care. Medical societies had to update guidelines and enhance new services such as video consultations. Cancer treatment had to be modified. The aim of this study is to ensure optimal care for cancer patients with the help of high-quality training even in times of crisis. We therefore conducted a nationwide survey of physicians in training in oncological disciplines during the pandemic to assess the impact on their education. METHODS: The survey was sent to tumour centres, hospitals, specialist societies, and working and junior research groups and distributed via newsletters and homepages. Interim results and a call for participation were published as a poster (DEGRO) [26] and in the German Cancer Society (DKG) journal FORUM [42]. The survey contained 53 questions on conditions of education and training and on clinical and scientific work. Statistics were carried out with LimeSurvey and SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: Between February and November 2022, 450 participants answered the survey, with radio-oncologists being the largest group (28%). Most colleagues (63%) had access to digital training methods. Virtual sessions were rated as a good alternative, especially as multidisciplinary meetings (54%) as well as in-house and external training programs (48%, 47%). The time spent by training supervisors on education was rated as less than before the pandemic by 57%. Half of all participants perceived communication (54%), motivation (44%) and atmosphere (50%) in the team as bad. The participants felt strongly burdened by extra work (55%) and by a changed team atmosphere (49%). One third felt a change in the quality of training during the pandemic and rated it as negative (35%). According to 37% of the participants, this had little influence on their own quality of work. Additional subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in gender, specialty and education level. CONCLUSION: In order to improve oncology training in times of crisis, access to digital training options and meetings should be ensured. Participants wish for regular team meetings in person to enable good team spirit, compensation for overtime work and sufficient time for training supervisors for discussion and feedback.

Survivors' perspectives on risks and benefits of Hodgkin lymphoma treatment: results of a survey by the German Hodgkin Study Group.

We performed a survey in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to learn more about their perspectives on treatment risks and benefits. We sent questions to 1149 survivors from the GHSG's HD13-15 trials with (N = 249) or without (N =900) documented progression or relapse. The participation rate was 52% (N =581). After median follow-up of 106 months, 40% of relapse-free and over 60% of relapsed survivors were still worried about late effects and the possibility of relapse. Chemotherapy, largely independent of its intensity, had been a strain on 74% of relapse-free and 90% of relapsed survivors. Most physical, psychological, and socio-economic sequelae were more frequent among relapsed survivors (p < .05) and described as very burdensome. 74% of relapse-free and 61% of relapsed survivors considered primary cure from Hodgkin lymphoma as the most important aspect in the choice of treatment. Accordingly, primary optimal lymphoma control is of utmost importance from the patients' perspective.

Doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine and lenalidomide for older Hodgkin lymphoma patients: final results of a German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) phase-I trial.

About 30% of all Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are ≥60 years old. As lenalidomide has promising single agent activity in multiple relapsed HL, we replaced bleomycin in ABVD with lenalidomide in this phase-I trial. Patients aged ≥60 years with early-unfavourable- or advanced-stage HL (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics score 0-7) received 4-8 cycles of AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) and lenalidomide in escalation with overdose control. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included thromboembolism ≥grade 2, severe haematological toxicity, neutropenic fever and prolonged therapy delay. Twenty-five patients with a median age of 68 years were included, 68% had advanced-stage HL. A pre-defined stopping criterion for dose escalation after DLT evaluation of 20/24 patients suggested a recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of 20 mg. DLTs occurred in 10/24 evaluable patients, all treated with ≥20 mg, however, median relative dose intensity was 97% (interquartile range 49-104%). Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in all 22 patients at ≥20 mg lenalidomide but no treatment-related deaths occurred. Overall response rate was 80% for all patients (20/25) and 86% (19/22) at ≥20 mg lenalidomide. Three-year estimates for progression-free survival and OS were 69·7% (95% CI: 50·3-89·1%) and 83·8% (95%-CI: 69·3-98·4%), respectively. In conclusion, AVD with lenalidomide 20 mg is feasible and highly effective in older HL patients.

Intensive treatment strategies in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD9 and HD12): analysis of long-term survival in two randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Although intensified chemotherapy regimens have improved tumour control and survival in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma, data on the long-term sequelae are scarce. We did preplanned follow-up analyses of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) trials HD9 and HD12 to assess whether the primary results of these trials-which had shown that intensive initial therapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma has a beneficial effect on treatment outcomes-would continue with longer follow-up. METHODS: In HD9 (Feb 1, 1993, to March 10, 1998), 1282 patients with newly diagnosed, histology-proven, advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma received eight alternating cycles of COPP and ABVD (COPP/ABVD), eight cycles of bBEACOPP, or eight cycles of eBEACOPP. In HD12 (Jan 4, 1999, to Jan 13, 2003; registered with ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00265031]), 1670 patients with newly diagnosed, histology-proven, advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma received eight cycles of eBEACOPP or four cycles of eBEACOPP plus four cycles of bBEACOPP (4 + 4), plus consolidation radiotherapy to initial bulk and residual disease or no radiotherapy, to analyse two non-inferiority objectives. In both trials, randomisation was done centrally in the GHSG trial coordination centre using the minimisation method including a random component, stratified according to centre, age, stage, international prognostic score, the presence or absence of a large mediastinal mass, and bulky disease. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. All analyses were done on the intention-to-treat principle. The primary endpoint of this follow-up analysis was progression-free survival (time from first diagnosis to progressive disease, relapse, or death from any cause or censoring at the date of last information on disease status). To assess whether long-term outcome might be impaired by long-term sequelae, we analysed overall survival and second primary malignant neoplasm incidence as key secondary endpoints. FINDINGS: Median observation time was 141 months (IQR 101-204) in HD9 and 97 months (69-143) in HD12. For HD9 trial patients, 15-year progression-free survival was 57·0% (95% CI 50·0-64·0) for COPP/ABVD, 66·8% (61·9-71·8) for bBEACOPP, and 74·0% (69·0-79·0) for eBEACOPP, 15-year overall survival was 72·3% (95% CI 66·5-78·1), 74·5% (70·1-78·9), and 80·9% (76·7-85·0), respectively. Progression-free survival and overall survival in the eBEACOPP group remained significantly better than in the COPP/ABVD group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53, 95% CI 0·41-0·69, p<0·0001, and 0·68, 0·50-0·93, p=0·015, respectively). The 15-year cumulative incidence of second primary malignant neoplasms was 7·2% (95% CI 3·7-10·7) after COPP/ABVD, 13·0% (9·1-16·9) after bBEACOPP, and 11·4% (7·6-15·1) after eBEACOPP. For HD12 trial patients, non-inferiority of 4 + 4 was shown, with 10-year progression-free survival of 82·6% (95% CI 79·6-85·6) for eBEACOPP and 80·6% (77·4-83·7) for 4 + 4 (HR 1·13 [0·89-1·43], within non-inferiority margin of 1·50), and 10-year overall survival of 87·3% (95% CI 84·7-89·9) and 86·8% (84·2-89·4), respectively (HR 1·02 [95% CI 0·77-1·36]). Among 555 (37%) patients with residual disease after chemotherapy, omission of radiotherapy was associated with significantly worse 10-year progression-free survival (89·7% [95% CI 85·8-93·6] radiotherapy vs 83·4% [78·2-88·5] for no radiotherapy; p=0·027) and 10-year overall survival (94·4% [91·4-97·3] vs 88·4% [83·8-93·0]; p=0·025). 10-year cumulative second primary malignant neoplasms incidence was 6·4% (95% CI 3·3-9·5) for 4 + 4 and 8·8% (5·2-12·4) for eBEACOPP. INTERPRETATION: Long-term follow-up of HD9 and HD12 shows an ongoing benefit of intensive first-line treatment and consolidation radiotherapy to residual disease in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival. Our results support the use of eBEACOPP in advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, because late toxicities such as second primary malignant neoplasms contribute to mortality, less toxic but equally effective treatments need to be developed to further improve overall survival. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V.

Bleomycin in older early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma patients: analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD10 and HD13 trials.

Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine sulfate, and dacarbazine (ABVD) is associated with severe toxicity in older patients, particularly from bleomycin-induced lung toxicity (BLT). Therefore, using bleomycin has been questioned in older Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients, especially in early-stage HL. We therefore analyzed feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of ABVD or AVD in 287 older early-stage favorable HL patients. We included patients ≥60 years of age in the German Hodgkin Study Group HD10 and HD13 trials randomized to either 2 cycles of ABVD (2×ABVD; n = 137) or AVD (2×AVD; n = 82), each followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT), with patients randomized to 4×ABVD+IF-RT (n = 68). Patients' median age was 65 years (range, 60-75) with comparable patient and disease characteristics. Grade III-IV adverse event rates were similar in patients receiving 2×AVD and 2×ABVD (40% and 39%, respectively), but considerably higher in patients receiving 4×ABVD (65%). Similarly, BLT was rare in patients receiving 2×ABVD/AVD, but occurred in 7/69 (10%) of patients randomized to 4×ABVD, with 3 lethal events. In conclusion, no effects of bleomycin on toxicity rates were detectable in older patients receiving 2 cycles of chemotherapy. However, we found a high risk of severe toxicity of bleomycin in older HL patients receiving more than 2 cycles of ABVD. These trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov and www.isrctn.com as #NCT00265018 (HD10) and #ISRCTN63474366 (HD13).