Clavicular hook plate versus dog-bone technique for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a retrospective cohort study comparing clinical outcome scores, complications, and costs.

INTRODUCTION: Arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation techniques have been promoted as providing superior outcomes for the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. Nevertheless, there is a lack of high-level evidence for clinically relevant benefits. At our institute, orthopaedic surgeons use an arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament fixation technique (DB), while general trauma surgeons use a clavicular hook plate (cHP) technique. The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes, complication rates, and costs between the two groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hospital database was searched for patients treated for acute traumatic high-grade (Rockwood Typ ≥ III) ACJ dislocation using either a cHP or arthroscopically assisted DB technique between 2010 and 2019. Seventy-nine patients could be included (56 patients in the cHP group and 23 in the DB group). QuickDASH scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, pain scores (numerical pain rating scale 10), and complication rates were retrospectively collected through phone interviews and by screening patient charts as well as surgical reports. Costs per patient were obtained from the hospital's accounting system. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 54 ± 33.7 and 45 ± 21.7 months in the cHP and DB group, respectively. QuickDASH and SSV scores did not differ, but patients in the cHP group reported significantly lower pain scores (p = 0.033). More patients reported hypertrophic or disturbing scars (p = 0.49) and sensibility disturbances (p = 0.007) in the cHP group. Three patients suffered from a frozen shoulder in the DB group (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcomes are excellent after long-term follow-up for both techniques. There are no clinically relevant differences in clinical outcome scores based on our results and a review of the literature. Both techniques certainly have their benefits regarding secondary outcome measures. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective cohort study.

Concept for Minimally Invasive Hook Plate Stabilisation of the Acromioclavicular Joint.

AIMS: Despite the availability of various operative procedures, hook plates are still one of the main implants used for the treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. The aim of this report is to present a novel minimally invasive operation technique for AC hook plate fixation. The functional outcomes of patients operated upon with this technique are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for 5 patients who were operated upon with minimally invasive hook plate fixation. The QuickDASH score (QDS) and subjective shoulder value (SSV) were used to express functional outcomes, and the numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate pain. RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow-up was 30±7 months. Patients were hospitalized for a mean of 3±1 days and operated upon for a mean of 54±7 minutes. Functional outcomes measured with the QDS showed a median (IQR) of 2.3 (0 - 6.8) and a median SSV relative to the healthy side of 95% (89 - 100). The median NRS was 0 (0 - 0). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocation led to excellent functional outcome scores without complications in a small case series of 5 patients.