RETINAL VASCULITIS SEVERITY ASSESSMENT: Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of a New Scheme for Grading Wide-Field Fluorescein Angiograms in Retinal Vasculitis.

PURPOSE: Wide-field fluorescein angiography is commonly used to assess retinal vasculitis (RV), which manifests as vascular leakage and occlusion. Currently, there is no standard grading scheme for RV severity. The authors propose a novel RV grading scheme and assess its reliability and reproducibility. METHODS: A grading scheme was developed to assess both leakage and occlusion in RV. Wide-field fluorescein angiography images from 50 patients with RV were graded by four graders, and one grader graded them twice. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine intraobserver-interobserver reliability. Generalized linear models were calculated to associate the scoring with visual acuity. RESULTS: Repeated grading by the same grader showed good intraobserver reliability for both leakage (ICC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.89) and occlusion (ICC = 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) scores. Interobserver reliability among four independent graders showed good agreement for both leakage (ICC = 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.77) and occlusion (ICC = 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.81) scores. An increasing leakage score was significantly associated with worse concurrent visual acuity (generalized linear models, ß = 0.090, P < 0.01) and at 1-year follow-up (generalized linear models, ß = 0.063, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The proposed grading scheme for RV has good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability across a range of graders. The leakage score related to present and future visual acuity.

Pathogen Burden Among ICU Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Hail Saudi Arabia with Particular Reference to ß-Lactamases Profile.

Purpose: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is associated with a higher mortality risk for critical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Several strategies, including using ß-lactam antibiotics, have been employed to prevent VAP in the ICU. However, the lack of a gold-standard method for VAP diagnosis and a rise in antibiotic-resistant microorganisms have posed challenges in managing VAP. The present study is designed to identify, characterize, and perform antimicrobial susceptibility of the microorganisms from different clinical types of infections in ICU patients with emphasis on VAP patients to understand the frequency of the latter, among others. Patients and Methods: A 1-year prospective study was carried out on patients in the ICU unit at a tertiary care hospital, Hail, Saudi Arabia. Results: A total of 591 clinically suspected hospital-acquired infections (HAI) were investigated, and a total of 163 bacterial isolates were obtained from different clinical specimens with a high proportion of bacteria found associated with VAP (70, 43%), followed by CAUTI (39, 24%), CLABSI (25, 15%), and SSI (14, 8.6%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common isolate 39 (24%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii 35 (21.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 25 (15.3%), and Proteus spp 23 (14%). Among the highly prevalent bacterial isolates, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase was predominant 42 (42.4%). Conclusion: Proper use of antibiotics, continuous monitoring of drug sensitivity patterns, and taking all precautionary measures to prevent beta-lactamase-producing organisms in clinical settings are crucial and significant factors in fending off life-threatening infections for a better outcome.

A complex case of haemodialysis induced increased intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: To describe a case of intraocular pressure fluctuation during haemodialysis in a patient with previously treated proliferative diabetic retinopathy and previous unilateral angle neovascularisation. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 63-year-old male with end-stage renal disease on maintenance haemodialysis and recurrent episodes of symptomatic intraocular pressure rise during dialysis sessions. Higher intraocular pressure spikes occurred in the eye with previous angle new vessels. OUTCOME: Topical antihypertensive drops failed to control the intraocular pressure. Due to multiple co-morbidities, options of medical management were deemed unsuitable; those included intravenous mannitol, systemic acetazolamide and intravenous glucose. Furthermore, modifications of his dialysis prescription did not lead to satisfactory results. As a consequence, the patient underwent trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Adequate control of his intraocular pressure was achieved post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure fluctuations during haemodialysis are not fully understood, and management can be quite challenging to the treating ophthalmologists and nephrologists. In this case report, we discuss some of those difficulties and different treatment options.