T-cell response to my mycobacterial antigens in lepromatous and tuberculoid leprosy

We showed that a large fraction of lepromatous patients do harbor helper-type circulating T-cells that can be activated in vitro by Mycobacterium leprae. M. leprae and PPD triggered T-cell lines could be then obtained from both tuberculoid and lepromatous patients. The proliferative response of these helper T-cells is predominantly directed against epitopes shared by several species of mycobacteria, in lepromatous patients as well as in tuberculoid patients, but species specific T-cells are also present. When presented in the context of M. leprae, these cross reactive epitopes usually fail to stimulate the T-cell lines of lepromatous patients, because of the contamination of the lines by supressor T-cells actavable by M. leprae. In one lepromatous patient, PPD and M. leprae reactive T-cell lines and clones (of the CD4 phenotype), exhibited a strong cytotoxic activity to autologous target cells coated with antigen: the relevance of this phenomenon to the pathophysiology of lepromatous leprosy remains however unknown.

Studies on T cell subsets and functions in leprosy

T cell subsets and T cell functions were explored in 31 leprosy patients with the following methods: determination of the percentages of the different T cell subpopulations defined by monoclonal antibodies directed at total T cells, helper T cells and suppressor/cytotoxic T cells; measurement of the in vitro proliferative responses to mitogens; study of the concanavalin A-induced suppressive activity, assessed on MLC; measurement of delayed-type hypersensitivity by skin testing. The confrontation between immunological lepromatous patients without type-2 reaction (erythema nodosum leprosum), (2) lepromatous patients without ENL (erythema nodosum leprosum), (2) lepromatous patients was recent ENL and (3) tuberculoid patients. Unexpectedly, groups 1 and 3, although differing strongly in their clinical status and their sensitivity to lepromin (absent in group 1 and strong in group 3), showed a similar immunological profile with a normal percentage of T cells and a normal distribution of T cells among the major T cell subset contrasting with a moderate decrease of proliferative responses to mitogens and impaired delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. Concanavalin A-induced suppressive activity was type-2 reaction) strongly differed from both other groups, showing striking abnormalities other groups, showing striking abnormalities of the repartition of the T cell subsets, with increased percentages of helper T cells and decreased percentages of suppressor T cells, and elevated proliferative responses to mitogens. Concanavalin A-induced suppressive activity was reduced in most patients of this group. It is suggested that this imbalance between T cell subsets contributes to the occurrence of ENL reactions in lepromatous patients.