A systematic task-based image quality assessment of photon-counting and energy integrating CT as a function of reconstruction kernel and phantom size.

BACKGROUND: Image quality of photon-counting and energy integrating CT scanners changes with object size, dose to the object, and kernel selection. PURPOSE: To comprehensively compare task-generic image quality of photon-counting CT (PCCT) and energy integrating CT (EICT) systems as a function of phantom size, dose, and reconstruction kernel. METHODS: A size-variant phantom (Mercury Phantom 3.0) was used to characterize the image quality of PCCT and EICT systems as a function of object size. The phantom contained five cylinders attached by slanted tapered sections. Each cylinder contained two sections: one uniform for noise, and the other with inserts for spatial resolution and contrast measurements. The phantom was scanned on Siemens' SOMATOM Force and NAEOTOM Alpha at 1.18 and 7.51 mGy without tube current modulation. CTDIvol was matched across two systems by setting the required tube currents, else, all other acquisition settings were fixed. CT sinograms were reconstructed using FBP and iterative (ADMIRE2 - Force; QIR2 - Alpha) algorithms with Body regular (Br) kernels. Noise Power Spectrum (NPS), Task Transfer Function (TTF), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and detectability index (d') for a task of identifying 2-mm disk were evaluated based on AAPM TG-233 metrology using imQuest, an open-source software package. Averaged noise frequency (fav ) and 50% cut-off frequency for TTF (f50 ) were used as scalar metrics to quantify noise texture and spatial resolution, respectively. The difference between image quality metrics' measurements was calculated as IQPCCT - IQEICT . RESULTS: From Br40 (soft) to Br64 (sharp), f50 for air insert increased from 0.35 mm-1  ± 0.04 (standard deviation) to 0.76 mm-1  ± 0.17, 0.34 mm-1  ± 0.04 to 0.77 mm-1  ± 0.17, 0.37 mm-1  ± 0.02 to 0.95 mm-1  ± 0.17 for PCCT-T3D-QIR2, PCCT-70keV-QIR2, and EICT-ADMIRE2, respectively, when averaged over all sizes and dose levels. Similarly, from Br40 to Br64, noise magnitude increased from 10.86 HU ± 7.12 to 38.61 HU ± 18.84, 10.94 HU ± 7.08 to 38.82 HU ± 18.70, 13.74 HU ± 11.02 to 52.11 HU ± 26.22 for PCCT-T3D-QIR2, PCCT-70keV-QIR2, and EICT-ADMIRE2, respectively. The difference in fav was consistent across all sizes and dose levels. PCCT-70keV-VMI showed better consistency in contrast measurements for iodine and bone inserts than PCCT-T3D and EICT; however, PCCT-T3D had higher contrast for both inserts. From Br40 to Br64, considering all sizes and dose levels, CNR for iodine insert decreased from 52.30 ± 46.44 to 12.18 ± 10.07, 40.42 ± 33.42 to 9.48 ± 7.16, 39.94 ± 37.60 to 7.84 ± 6.67 for PCCT-T3D-QIR2, PCCT-70keV-QIR2, and EICT-ADMIRE2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both PCCT image types, T3D and 70-keV-VMI exhibited similar or better noise, contrast, CNR than EICT when comparing kernels with similar names. For 512 × 512 matrix, PCCT's sharp kernels had lower resolution than EICT's sharp kernels. For all image quality metrics, except extreme low, every dose condition had a similar set of IQ-matching kernels. It suggests that considering patient size and dose level to determine IQ-matching kernel pairs across PCCT and EICT systems may not be imperative while translating protocols, except when the signal to the detector is extremely low.

Exploration of the pulse pileup effects in a clinical CdTe-based photon-counting computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: High tube current generates a high flux of x-rays to photon counting detectors (PCDs) that can potentially result in the piling up of pulses formed by concurrent photons, which can cause count loss and energy resolution degradation. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of clinical photon-counting CT (PCCT) systems in high flux, potentially influenced by pulse pileup effects, in terms of task-generic image quality metrics. METHODS: A clinical phantom was scanned on a commercial PCCT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) at 120 kV under fourteen different tube current levels (40-1000 mA) with a rotation time of 0.25 s and a pitch of 1. The dose levels corresponded to CTDIvol (32 cm phantom) of 0.79-19.8 mGy. CT sinograms were reconstructed using QIR-off mode (noniterative reconstruction algorithm), Br44 kernel, and a voxel size of 0.4102 × 0.4102 × 3 mm 3 $0.4102 \times 0.4102 \times 3{\mathrm{\ mm}}^3$ . imQuest, an open-source MATLAB-based software package was used to calculate noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and CT number according to AAPM Task Group 233 metrology. RESULTS: The 50% cut-off frequency of TTF (f50 ) remained mostly constant across all higher tube currents for all inserts, namely polyethylene, bone, air, and acrylic. Using the lowest two data points (40 and 80 mA), the expected relationship between noise magnitude and tube current was determined to be noise ∝ $ \propto \ $ mA-0.47 . The measured noise magnitude were up to 11.1% higher than the expected value at the highest tube current. The average frequency of NPS (fav ) decreased from 0.32 to 0.29 mm-1 as tube current increased from 40 to 1000 mA. No considerable effects were observed in CT number measurement of any insert; however, CT numbers for air and bone changed almost monotonically as tube current increased. Absolute CNR increased monotonically for all inserts; however, the difference between measured and expected CNRs were approximately -6% to 12% across all tube currents. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing tube currents did not affect the spatial resolution, but slightly affected the CT number and noise measurements of the clinical PCCT system. However, the effects were only considerable at clinically irrelevant tube currents used on a small 20-cm phantom. In general clinical practices, automatic exposure control techniques are used to decrease the variation of flux on the detector, which alleviates the chances of detector saturation due to high count rates. The observed effects could be due to pulse pileup, signal-dependent filtration of the system, or nonlinearities in the reconstruction algorithm. In conclusion, either the deadtime of the detector used in the photon-counting CT system is shorter such that count losses due to pulse pileup are negligible, or pulse pileup has inconsiderable effects on the image quality of clinical photon-counting CT systems in routine clinical practice due to possible corrections applied on the system.

Quantitative performance of photon-counting CT at low dose: Virtual monochromatic imaging and iodine quantification.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative imaging techniques, such as virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) and iodine quantification (IQ), have proven valuable diagnostic methods in several specific clinical tasks such as tumor and tissue differentiation. Recently, a new generation of computed tomography (CT) scanners equipped with photon-counting detectors (PCD) has reached clinical status. PURPOSE: This work aimed to investigate the performance of a new photon-counting CT (PC-CT) in low-dose quantitative imaging tasks, comparing it to an earlier generation CT scanner with an energy-integrating detector dual-energy CT (DE-CT). The accuracy and precision of the quantification across size, dose, material types (including low and high iodine concentrations), displacement from iso-center, and solvent (tissue background) composition were explored. METHODS: Quantitative analysis was performed on two clinical scanners, Siemens SOMATOM Force and NAEOTOM Alpha using a multi-energy phantom with plastic inserts mimicking different iodine concentrations and tissue types. The tube configurations in the dual-energy scanner were 80/150Sn kVp and 100/150Sn kVp, while for PC-CT both tube voltages were set to either 120 or 140 kVp with photon-counting energy thresholds set at 20/65 or 20/70 keV. The statistical significance of patient-related parameters in quantitative measurements was examined using ANOVA and pairwise comparison with the posthoc Tukey honest significance test. Scanner bias was assessed in both quantitative tasks for relevant patient-specific parameters. RESULTS: The accuracy of IQ and VMI in the PC-CT was comparable between standard and low radiation doses (p < 0.01). The patient size and tissue type significantly affect the accuracy of both quantitative imaging tasks in both scanners. The PC-CT scanner outperforms the DE-CT scanner in the IQ task in all cases. Iodine quantification bias in the PC-CT (-0.9 ± 0.15 mg/mL) at low doses in our study was comparable to that of DE-CT (range -2.6 to 1.5 mg/mL, published elsewhere) at a 1.7× higher dose, but the dose reduction severely biased DE-CT (4.72 ± 0.22 mg/mL). The accuracy in Hounsfield units (HU) estimation was comparable for 70 and 100 keV virtual imaging between scanners, but PC-CT was significantly underestimating virtual 40 keV HU values of dense materials in the phantom representing the extremely obese population. CONCLUSIONS: The statistical analysis of our measurements reveals better IQ at lower radiation doses using new PC-CT. Although VMI performance was mostly comparable between the scanners, the DE-CT scanner quantitatively outperformed PC-CT when estimating HU values in the specific case of very large phantoms and dense materials, benefiting from increased X-ray tube potentials.

Pediatric Applications of Photon-Counting Detector CT.

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT represents the most recent generational advance in CT technology. PCD CT has the potential to reduce image noise, improve spatial resolution and contrast resolution, and provide multispectral capability, all of which may be achieved with an overall decrease in the radiation dose. These effects may be used to reduce the iodinated contrast media dose and potentially obtain multiphase images through a single-acquisition technique. The benefits of PCD CT have previously been shown primarily in phantoms and adult patients. This article describes the application of PCD CT in children, as illustrated by clinical examples from a commercially available PCD CT system.

Effect of tube current on computed tomography radiomic features.

Variability in the x-ray tube current used in computed tomography may affect quantitative features extracted from the images. To investigate these effects, we scanned the Credence Cartridge Radiomics phantom 12 times, varying the tube current from 25 to 300 mA∙s while keeping the other acquisition parameters constant. For each of the scans, we extracted 48 radiomic features from the categories of intensity histogram (n = 10), gray-level run length matrix (n = 11), gray-level co-occurrence matrix (n = 22), and neighborhood gray tone difference matrix (n = 5). To gauge the size of the tube current effects, we scaled the features by the coefficient of variation of the corresponding features extracted from images of non-small cell lung cancer tumors. Variations in the tube current had more effect on features extracted from homogeneous materials (acrylic, sycamore wood) than from materials with more tissue-like textures (cork, rubber particles). Thirty-eight of the 48 features extracted from acrylic were affected by current reductions compared with only 2 of the 48 features extracted from rubber particles. These results indicate that variable x-ray tube current is unlikely to have a large effect on radiomic features extracted from computed tomography images of textured objects such as tumors.