ABSTRACT
The prevalent model for cataract formation in the eye lens posits that damaged crystallin proteins form light-scattering aggregates. The α-crystallins are thought to counteract this process as chaperones by sequestering misfolded crystallin proteins. In this scenario, chaperone pool depletion would result in lens opacification. Here we analyze lenses from different mouse strains that develop early-onset cataract due to point mutations in α-, ß-, or γ-crystallin proteins. We find that these mutant crystallins are unstable in vitro; in the lens, their levels are substantially reduced, and they do not accumulate in the water-insoluble fraction. Instead, all the other crystallin proteins, including the α-crystallins, are found to precipitate. The changes in protein composition and spatial organization of the crystallins observed in the mutant lenses suggest that the imbalance in the lenticular proteome and altered crystallin interactions are the bases for cataract formation, rather than the aggregation propensity of the mutant crystallins.
Subject(s)
Cataract/metabolism , Crystallins/metabolism , Lens, Crystalline , Protein Aggregation, Pathological , Animals , Lens, Crystalline/metabolism , Lens, Crystalline/pathology , Mice , Molecular Chaperones/metabolism , Proteome/metabolismABSTRACT
BiP is the endoplasmic member of the Hsp70 family. BiP is regulated by several co-chaperones including the nucleotide-exchange factor (NEF) Bap (Sil1 in yeast). Bap is a two-domain protein. The interaction of the Bap C-terminal domain with the BiP ATPase domain is sufficient for its weak NEF activity. However, stimulation of the BiP ATPase activity requires full-length Bap, suggesting a complex interplay of these two factors. Here, single-molecule FRET experiments with mammalian proteins reveal that Bap affects the conformation of both BiP domains, including the lid subdomain, which is important for substrate binding. The largely unstructured Bap N-terminal domain promotes the substrate release from BiP. Thus, Bap is a conformational regulator affecting both nucleotide and substrate interactions. The preferential interaction with BiP in its ADP state places Bap at a late stage of the chaperone cycle, in which it coordinates release of substrate and ADP, thereby resetting BiP for ATP and substrate binding.
Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation , Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors/chemistry , Heat-Shock Proteins/chemistry , Molecular Chaperones/chemistry , Nucleotides/chemistry , Adenosine Diphosphate/chemistry , Adenosine Triphosphatases/chemistry , Adenosine Triphosphate/chemistry , Animals , Anisotropy , Area Under Curve , Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP , Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer , HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins/chemistry , Humans , Kinetics , Mice , Models, Molecular , Protein Binding , Protein Domains , Protein Structure, Secondary , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismABSTRACT
Small heat-shock proteins, including αB-crystallin (αB), play an important part in protein homeostasis, because their ATP-independent chaperone activity inhibits uncontrolled protein aggregation. Mechanistic details of human αB, particularly in its client-bound state, have been elusive so far, owing to the high molecular weight and the heterogeneity of these complexes. Here we provide structural insights into this highly dynamic assembly and show, by using state-of-the-art NMR spectroscopy, that the αB complex is assembled from asymmetric building blocks. Interaction studies demonstrated that the fibril-forming Alzheimer's disease Aß1-40 peptide preferentially binds to a hydrophobic edge of the central ß-sandwich of αB. In contrast, the amorphously aggregating client lysozyme is captured by the partially disordered N-terminal domain of αB. We suggest that αB uses its inherent structural plasticity to expose distinct binding interfaces and thus interact with a wide range of structurally variable clients.
