Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: Current Challenges and a Review of the Contemporary Percutaneous Options for Management.

The use of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) in the surgical management of obstructive coronary artery disease remains high despite a growing understanding of their limitations in longevity. In contemporary practice, approximately 95% of patients receive one SVG in addition to a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft. The precise patency rates for SVGs vary widely in the literature, with estimates of up to 61% failure rate at greater than 10 years of follow-up. SVGs are known to progressively degenerate over time and, even if they remain patent, demonstrate marked accelerated atherosclerosis. Multiple studies have demonstrated a marked acceleration of atherosclerosis in bypassed native coronary arteries compared to non-bypassed arteries, which predisposes to a high number of native chronic total occlusions (CTOs) and subsequent procedural challenges when managing graft failure. Patients with failing SVGs frequently require revascularisation to previously grafted territories, with estimates of 13% of CABG patients requiring an additional revascularisation procedure within 10 years. Redo CABG confers a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality and, as such, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the favoured strategy for revascularisation in SVG failure. Percutaneous treatment of a degenerative SVG provides unique challenges secondary to a tendency for frequent superimposed thrombi on critical graft stenoses, friable lesions with marked potential for distal embolization and subsequent no-reflow phenomena, and high rates of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI). Furthermore, the rates of restenosis within SVG stents are disproportionately higher than native vessel PCI despite the advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology. The alternative to SVG PCI in failed grafts is PCI to the native vessel, 'replacing' the grafts and restoring patency within the previously grafted coronary artery, with or without occluding the donor graft. This strategy has additional challenges to de novo coronary artery PCI, however, due to the high burden of complex atherosclerotic lesion morphology, extensive coronary calcification, and the high incidence of CTO. Large patient cohort studies have reported worse short- and long-term outcomes with SVG PCI compared to native vessel PCI. The PROCTOR trial is a large and randomised control trial aimed at assessing the superiority of native vessel PCI versus vein graft PCI in patients with prior CABG awaiting results. This review article will explore the complexities of SVG failure and assess the contemporary evidence in guiding optimum percutaneous interventional strategy.

Temporal Trends in In-Hospital Outcomes Following Unprotected Left-Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of 14 522 Cases From British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database 2009 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used as a treatment option for unprotected left main stem artery (unprotected left main stem percutaneous intervention) disease. However, whether patient outcomes have improved over time is uncertain. METHODS: Using the United Kingdom national PCI database, we studied all patients undergoing unprotected left main stem percutaneous intervention between 2009 and 2017. We excluded patients who presented with ST-segment-elevation, cardiogenic shock, and with an emergency indication for PCI. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2017, in the study-indicated population, 14 522 unprotected left main stem percutaneous intervention procedures were performed. Significant temporal changes in baseline demographics were observed with increasing patient age and comorbid burden. Procedural complexity increased over time, with the number of vessels treated, bifurcation PCI, number of stents used, and use of intravascular imaging and rotational atherectomy increased significantly through the study period. After adjustment for baseline differences, there were significant temporal reductions in the occurrence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (P<0.001 for trend), in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (P<0.001 for trend), and acute procedural complications (P<0.001 for trend). In multivariable analysis examining the associates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, while age per year (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CIs, 1.01-1.03]), female sex (odds ratio, 1.47 [1.19-1.82]), 3 or more stents (odds ratio, 1.67 [05% [1.02-2.67]), and patient comorbidity were associated with higher rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, by contrast use of intravascular imaging (odds ratio, 0.56 [0.45-0.70]), and year of PCI (odds ratio, 0.63 [0.46-0.87]) were associated with lower rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Despite trends for increased patient and procedural complexity, in-hospital patient outcomes have improved after unprotected left main stem percutaneous intervention over time.

A case of percutaneous tricuspid valve infective endocarditis vegetation debulking using the AngioJet rheolytic catheter system-A novel therapeutic use.

In patients with fulminant tricuspid valve infective endocarditis precluded from cardiothoracic intervention based on comorbidities or clinical status, percutaneous vegetation debulking utilizing the AngioJet rheolytic catheter system appears a viable rescue option to achieve source control.

Twelve-Month Outcomes With a Bioresorbable Everolimus-Eluting Scaffold: Results of the ESHC-BVS Registry at Two Australian Centers.

BACKGROUND: The Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS; Abbott Vascular) is a relatively new type of coronary stent designed to provide temporary vessel scaffolding following percutaneous coronary intervention. International use of the device has grown despite a relative paucity of clinical data regarding the performance of the device and the optimal strategy for its use. We report 12-month clinical data on the Absorb BVS from a real-world registry in order to contribute to the overall understanding of the BVS device. METHODS AND RESULTS: Absorb BVS implantation was attempted in 152 lesions in 100 patients at two Sydney hospitals, as part of the prospective ESHC-BVS registry. Patients selected harbored a range of complex lesions as encountered in real-world practice. Type-C lesions made up 37% of all lesions treated, with 64% of these being long lesions (>20 mm). Device success was achieved in 98.8% of cases. Predilation was performed in all scaffolds and postdilation was performed in 95% of scaffolds to a mean of 19.6 ± 4.6 atm. Twelve-month follow-up data were available for 99% of patients. At 12 months, the cumulative incidence of target-lesion revascularization was 4%, while the incidence of myocardial infarction was 2% and the incidence of scaffold thrombosis was 1%. There were no deaths in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In a cohort including complex lesions encountered in real-world practice, the Absorb BVS was associated with low rates of target-lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, and scaffold thrombosis at 12 months when used with a strategy of meticulous lesion preparation, routine postdilation, and 12 months of dual-antiplatelet therapy.

Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation in Real World and Complex Coronary Disease: Procedural and 30-day Outcomes at Two Australian Centres.

BACKGROUND: The Absorb BVS is a new generation of coronary stent designed to provide coronary arteries with mechanical support of a temporary nature, following balloon angioplasty. Clinical trials of the device have shown promising results thus far, however concern surrounds the deliverability of the device in real-world and complex coronary disease, and the possible higher incidence of early scaffold thrombosis when compared to conventional metallic drug-eluting stents. METHODS: Implantation of the Absorb BVS was attempted in 152 lesions in 100 patients at two Sydney teaching hospitals, as part of a prospective registry. Lesions treated reflected a wide spectrum of real-world disease. Young patient age, long lesion length and involvement of the mid-portion of the left anterior descending artery were the strongest factors likely to influence the decision to use the Absorb BVS over conventional metallic stents. There were no restrictions on the lesion length, or on the number of lesions or vessels treated. Type C lesions made up 37% of all lesions treated with 64% of these being long lesions (>20mm). The Absorb BVS was successfully implanted in 98.8% of cases. Post-dilatation was performed in 95% of scaffolds. Peri-procedural non-ST elevation myocardial infarction occurred in four cases. Scaffold thrombosis did not occur in any patient at 30 days follow-up. There was no death, or need for target lesion revascularisation in-hospital or at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of procedural success were achieved with minimal complications with use of the Absorb BVS in real-world coronary disease, including complex disease. These results suggest that the reduced deliverability of the device can be largely overcome by meticulous lesion preparation, and that early scaffold thrombosis may be minimised through scaffold post-dilatation.