Block-and-replace regimen versus titration of antithyroid drugs: a recent meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Drug therapy for Graves' disease (GD) is the first-line treatment in Europe. The use of a specific regimen for the administration of anti-thyroid drugs (ATDs) is still controversial. The objective was to compare block-and-replace therapy (BRT) with a titration (T) regimen in terms of incidence of overt hypothyroidism and development of Graves' orbitopathy (GO) over 18 months of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library) and reference lists were searched. Prospective and retrospective observational cohort studies were included. Data collection and analysis were performed independently by 2 authors. RESULTS: Two studies with 716 GD patients (40.36% treated with BRT, 59.64% with T regimen) were included. No statistically significant differences were observed between the ATDs regimens used in terms of incidence of overt hypothyroidism during 18 months of treatment [Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) odds ratio (OR): 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-3.16, p-value = 0.24]. GD patients who followed BRT were less likely to achieve control of thyroid function than patients on T regimen (M-H OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.88, p = 0.01). One study reported fewer thyroid function tests (TFT) during BRT than during the T regimen. The other study included patients without GO at baseline and reported a lower incidence of GO during BRT than in the T regimen (9.1% versus 17.8%), with no statistical difference between the 2 regimens (M-H OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.19-1.14, p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: BRT may be more useful than the T regimen for patients with complicated GD or for those who required fewer TFTs.

Lipid Profile Evolution in Graves' Disease Treated with Titration Regimen of Anti-Thyroid Drugs Versus Block and Replace Regimen.

The aim was to compare the lipid profile of patients with GD treated with anti-thyroid drugs (ATDs) using a titration regimen versus a block and replace regimen. This is an 18-month prospective observational study. In this study were included 149 medically treated GD patients, aged+>+18 years. Pregnant women and patients treated with radioactive iodine therapy or partial/total thyroidectomy were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 subgroups: titration (A) and block and replace (B) therapy, according to the ATD regimen used. Thyroid and metabolic profile was measured at baseline and at least one visit during medical treatment. The whole group included 122 (81.87%) females (F) and 27 (18.12%) males (M), ratio F:M=4.5:1. As expected, at the time of diagnosis, thyrotoxic patients were with normal lipid profile. During medical treatment, in patients who achieved euthyroidism, the cholesterol levels increased as follows: in subgroup A: by 52.9 mg/dl (95% CI: 26.4-79.3), p<0.001 for total cholesterol (T-C), by 33.3 mg/dl (95% CI: 10.3-56.3), p=0.007 for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and by 11.44 mg/dl (95% CI: 3.08-19.79), p=0.009 for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); in subgroup B T-C increased by 45.1 mg/dl (95% CI: 22.2-68), p<0.001 and for LDL-C by 33.57 mg/dl (95% CI: 12.72-54.42), p=0.003. No statistically significant increase in triglyceride levels was determined. Medical treatment of hyperthyroidism due to Graves' disease increased cholesterol levels regardless of the ATD regimen used.

Bilateral pheochromocytomas: clinical presentation and morbidity rate related to surgery technique and genetic status.

Background: Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) are rare catecholamine-secreting adrenal tumors. Approximately 60-90% of bilateral PHEOs are hereditary. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients with bilateral PHEOs and the morbidity rate (malignancy, tumor recurrence and adrenal insufficiency (AI) rate) related to surgery technique and genetic status of the patients. Results: Fourteen patients (12.5%, nine women, five men) had synchronous or metachronous bilateral PHEOs (out of 112 PHEO patients who underwent surgery between 1976 and 2021). The median age at diagnosis was 32 years (9-76) (three were children). Nine patients (64.2%) presented synchronous bilateral tumors, five (35.7%) contralateral metachronous tumors, 2-12 years after the first surgical intervention; three (21.4%) were metastatic. Median follow-up: 5 years (1-41), IQR 19 months. A total of 78.5% had a germline mutation (eight RET gene with MEN2A syndrome, three VHL syndrome, three not tested). Post-surgery recurrence was noted in 16.6% of patients (one with MEN2A syndrome and metastatic PHEOs, one with VHL syndrome), with similar rates after total adrenalectomy or cortical-sparing adrenal surgery. AI was avoided in 40% after cortical-sparing surgery. Conclusion: Bilateral PHEOs are usually associated with genetic syndromes. The surgical technique for patients with hereditary bilateral PHEOs should be chosen based on a personalized approach, as they are at higher risk for developing new adrenal tumors requiring additional surgeries.

The ETA-ESE statement on the European Chemicals Agency opinion on iodine as an endocrine disruptor.

In 2022, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) made a statement concluding that iodine is an endocrine disruptor (ED). "We stress the fact that the ECHA opinion ECHA/BPC/357/2022 is based on their misguidedly zooming in on exclusively the biocidal products (e.g., hand disinfectants, disinfection of animals' teats/udder, embalming fluids before cremation, etc.) that contain molecular iodine (I2), entirely neglecting [see the 2013 ECHA Regulation (EU) n°528/2012 describing iodine as being of "great importance for human health". Clearly, the current sweeping and erroneous classification of "iodine" as an endocrine disruptor is ill-advised. We moreover call upon the scientific and medical community at large to use the accurate scientific nomenclature, i.e., iodide or iodate instead of "iodine" when referring to iodized salts and food prepared there with. Drugs, diagnostic agents, and synthetic chemicals containing the element iodine in the form of covalent bonds must be correctly labelled ''iodinated'', if possible, using each time their distinctive and accurate chemical or pharmacological name.