ABSTRACT
In recent years, notable advancements have been made in managing endocrine system disorders and arrhythmias. These advancements have brought about significant changes in healthcare providers' approach towards these complex medical conditions. Endocrine system disorders encompass a diverse range of conditions, including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, and adrenal disorders. Significant advancements in comprehending the molecular underpinnings of these disorders have laid the foundation for implementing personalized medicine. Advancements in genomic profiling and biomarker identification have facilitated achieving more accurate diagnoses and developing customized treatment plans. Furthermore, the utilization of cutting-edge pharmaceuticals and advanced delivery systems presents a significant advancement in achieving enhanced glycemic control and minimizing adverse effects for individuals afflicted with endocrine disorders. Arrhythmias, characterized by irregular heart rhythms, present a substantial risk to cardiovascular well-being. Innovative strategies for managing arrhythmia encompass catheter-based ablation techniques, wearable cardiac monitoring devices, and predictive algorithms powered by artificial intelligence. These advancements facilitate the early detection, stratification of risks, and implementation of targeted interventions, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Incorporating technology and telemedicine has been instrumental in enhancing the accessibility and continuity of care for individuals diagnosed with endocrine disorders and arrhythmias. The utilization of remote patient monitoring and telehealth consultations enables prompt modifications to treatment regimens and alleviates the need for frequent visits to the clinic. This is particularly significant in light of the current global health crisis. This review highlights the interdisciplinary nature of managing endocrine disorders and arrhythmias, underscoring the significance of collaboration among endocrinologists, cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and other healthcare professionals. Multidisciplinary care teams have enhanced their capabilities to effectively address the intricate relationship between the endocrine and cardiovascular systems. In summary, endocrine system disorders and arrhythmias management have undergone significant advancements due to groundbreaking research, technological advancements, and collaborative healthcare approaches. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the advancements, showcasing their potential to enhance patient care, improve quality of life, and decrease healthcare expenses. Healthcare providers must comprehend and integrate these advancements into their clinical practice to enhance outcomes for individuals with endocrine system disorders and arrhythmias.
ABSTRACT
Background and objective The recent emergence of new molecules like angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has highlighted the need for an update in heart failure (HF) management, as they have proven to yield better patient outcomes compared to the traditional angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) use. This study aimed to compare HF-related hospitalization and death in patients on either ACEI/ARBs or ARNI in a local setting. Methods This two-arm interventional study was conducted in the cardiology and internal medicine units of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan from July 2018 to December 2020. After enrollment, participants were randomized into two groups as per 1:1 ratio using an online research randomizer software (https://www.randomizer.org). Group A received 24/26 or 49/51 mg sacubitril/valsartan twice daily for HF. Group B received 2.5 or 5 mg enalapril twice daily. Patients were followed up for 12 months or till the development of an event. Results The sacubitril/valsartan group had significantly fewer HF-related hospitalizations compared to the enalapril group (13.8% vs. 22.4%; p-value: 0.03), with a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 38.3%. The sacubitril/valsartan group had 52% RRR for HF-related deaths compared to the enalapril group. Conclusion Based on our findings, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan was superior to enalapril in reducing the risk of hospitalization and death related to HF. The magnitude of the beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan as compared to enalapril on cardiovascular mortality was at least as high as that of long-term treatment with enalapril.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Stress and anxiety may disrupt normal GI function and lead to several GI disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In this study, we aimed to predict the prevalence of GERD in young patients and its association with anxiety and depression. Material and Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 2,500 participants from the general public, with an age range of 18 to 40 years. Diagnosis of GERD was made via the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) questionnaire. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess anxiety and depression. Results GERD was diagnosis in 401 (16.0%) participants. Anxiety was significantly more common in participants with GERD compared to participants without GERD (40.3% vs. 19.5%; p < 0.01). Similarly, participants with GERD had a higher prevalence of depression compared to participants without GERD (42.6% vs. 18.3%; p < 0.01). Conclusion GERD is highly prevalent among the young population. Anxiety and depression are significantly more prevalent in patients with GERD. Hence, the young population must be thoroughly screened for GERD to minimize the risk of long-term complications. Furthermore, patients diagnosed with GERD should be screened for depression and anxiety.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The symptoms of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) may range from mild to severe. Patients usually present with fever, cough, and other respiratory tract symptoms, but may also be asymptomatic. Some studies have also indicated the ocular involvement by the virus. This study aims to look deeply into all ophthalmic findings seen in COVID-19 patients and their clinical characteristics. METHODS: This longitudinal study was conducted in the COVID-19 unit of a tertiary care hospital, Pakistan. Data of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection between July 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. Ophthalmological examination was done at the time of admission and was repeated every alternate day to look for any ophthalmological manifestation. RESULTS: Out of 441 (n= 441), 61 (13.8%) participants had ophthalmological findings on examination. Patients with ophthalmological findings were significantly younger compared to patients without ophthalmological findings (42 ± 6 years vs. 44 ± 7; p-value, 0.03). C-reactive protein (CRP) was also significantly higher in patients with ophthalmological findings (122.2 ± 16.2 vs. 112.8 ± 19.8; p-value, 0.005). The most common ophthalmological finding was conjunctival irritation (50.8%), followed by diplopia (27.8%) and cotton wool spots (27.8%). CONCLUSION: Ophthalmological findings are prevalent in patients with COVID-19. In this study, patients with higher CRP levels were associated with ophthalmological findings. It is important to conduct ophthalmological examinations in patients with COVID-19, as they may give a clue about other complications associated with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Human hands play a prominent role in the intra and interpersonal transmission of microbes that constantly connect one's microbiome to other individuals and the environment. Along with beneficial bacteria, an individual may harbor pathogenic organisms which may get transferred to others. Thus, understanding the transmission mechanism and interaction among microbiota is crucial in preventing infection. In the present study, the ability of skin microbes, isolated from different individuals, to physically interact (coaggregate) intergenically was assessed. The bacterial flora from the hands (palm area) of similar age group students was isolated. The predominant isolates were selected and identified using 16s rRNA gene sequencing. Further, these isolates were subjected to visual coaggregation assay. A total of 27 bacteria were isolated from the human skin (palm area-fingers) of 10 individuals. These isolates belong to seven bacterial genera and 10 different species. Among 123 combinational visual coaggregation positive reactions; 53.66% showed a reaction score of +1, while 32.52%, 11.38% and 2.44% showed a score of +2, +3, and +4 respectively. Among 27 isolates, Staphylococcus haemolyticus had highest coaggregation partners of 17 followed by Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp. with 15 partners each. The present study is the first report demonstrating the coaggregation potential of microbiota harboring the skin surface of the human hand. The study indicates that few microbes have high potential to influence coaggregation among distinct genera isolated from the skin. However, further studies are needed to understand the ability of these bacteria to coaggregate, their influence in interpersonal transmission and shaping of microbial ecology of the host skin.
