BRCA1-associated RING domain-1 (BARD1) loss and GBP1 expression enhance sensitivity to DNA damage in Ewing sarcoma.

Ewing sarcoma is a fusion oncoprotein-driven primary bone tumor. A subset of patients (~10%) with Ewing sarcoma are known to harbor germline variants in a growing number of genes involved in DNA damage repair. We recently reported our discovery of a germline mutation in the DNA damage repair protein BARD1 (BRCA1-associated RING domain-1) in a patient with Ewing sarcoma. BARD1 is recruited to the site of DNA double stranded breaks via the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) protein and plays a critical role in DNA damage response pathways including homologous recombination. We thus questioned the impact of BARD1 loss on Ewing cell sensitivity to DNA damage and the Ewing sarcoma transcriptome. We demonstrate that PSaRC318 cells, a novel patient-derived cell line harboring a pathogenic BARD1 variant, are sensitive to PARP inhibition and by testing the effect of BARD1 depletion in additional Ewing sarcoma cell lines, we confirm that BARD1 loss enhances cell sensitivity to PARP inhibition plus radiation. Additionally, RNA-seq analysis revealed that loss of BARD1 results in the upregulation of GBP1 (guanylate-binding protein 1), a protein whose expression is associated with variable response to therapy depending on the adult carcinoma subtype examined. Here, we demonstrate that GBP1 contributes to the enhanced sensitivity of BARD1 deficient Ewing cells to DNA damage. Together, our findings demonstrate the impact of loss-of function mutations in DNA damage repair genes, such as BARD1, on Ewing sarcoma treatment response.

Clinicopathologic Characterization of Hypocellular Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Showed Fewer Genetic Abnormalities Involving Cell Proliferation and NPM1 When Compared With Nonhypocellular AML.

OBJECTIVES: Hypocellular acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncommon. Despite the prognostic and therapeutic importance of mutational analysis, the mutational landscape of hypocellular AML is not well understood. METHODS: We identified 25 patients with hypocellular AML, and 141 patients with nonhypocellular AML were identified as a control group. We applied next-generation sequencing for the first time to profile this entity. RESULTS: The hypocellular AML patients were older than those with nonhypocellular AML (P = .037). At diagnosis, hypocellular AML had lower leukocyte counts (P = .012), higher hemoglobin (P = .003), and lower blast counts in the peripheral blood (P < .001) and bone marrow (P = .003). Hypocellular AML was less likely to have mutations involving cell proliferation (P = .027) and NPM1 (P = .022) compared with nonhypocellular AML. Hypocellular AML showed a high incidence of spliceosomal mutations and myelodysplastic syndrome-defining chromosome abnormalities (65%), but the incidence was not significantly different from that in nonhypocellular AML. There was no significant survival difference between hypocellular and nonhypocellular AML. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate hypocellular AML showed fewer genetic alterations involving cell proliferation and NPM1 when compared directly with nonhypocellular AML; this finding likely contributes to the low marrow cellularity in at least a portion of the patients with hypocellular AML.