Positive health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey among community-dwelling older individuals in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) reached the Netherlands in February 2020. To minimize the spread of the virus, the Dutch government announced an "intelligent lockdown". Older individuals were urged to socially isolate completely, because they are at risk of a severe disease course. Although isolation reduces the medical impact of the virus, the non-medical impact should also be considered. AIM: To investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictive measures on the six dimensions of Positive Health in community-dwelling older individuals living in the Netherlands, and to identify differences within subgroups. METHODS: In May/June 2020, community-dwelling older individuals aged ≥ 65 years completed an online survey based on Huber's model of Positive Health. Positive Health was measured regarding the appreciation of the six dimensions (categorized as poor/satisfactory/excellent) and a comparison with a year before (categorized as decreased/unchanged/increased) using frequencies (%) and a chi-square test. RESULTS: 834 older individuals participated (51% women, 38% aged ≥ 76 years, 35% living alone, 16% self-rated poor health). Most respondents assessed their bodily functions, mental well-being and daily functioning as satisfactory, their meaningfulness and quality of life (QoL) as excellent, and their social participation as poor. 12% of the respondents reported a deterioration of 4-6 dimensions and 73% in 1-3 dimensions, compared to the past year. Deterioration was most frequently experienced in the dimension social participation (73%), the dimension mental well-being was most frequently improved (37%) and quality of life was in 71% rated as unchanged. Women more often observed a deterioration of 4-6 dimensions than men (15% vs. 8%, p = 0.001), and individuals with self-rated poor health more often than individuals with self-rated good health (22% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). Older individuals living alone experienced more frequently a decrease in meaningfulness compared to older individuals living together. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictive measures had a substantial impact on all six dimensions of Positive Health in community-dwelling older individuals, especially in women, respondents living alone and respondents with self-rated poor general health.

Recombinant human erythropoietin improves health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and anaemia of chronic disease; utility measures correlate strongly with disease activity measures.

Treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (r-hu-Epo) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and anaemia of chronic disease (ACD) resulted in improvement of both anaemia and disease activity. Utilities represent a generic and comprehensive quality of life measure, capable of integrating domain-specific information into one overall value which a patient assigns to his state of health. Therefore, the effect of r-hu-Epo on quality of life was studied by measuring utilities, derived from the rating scale and standard gamble, in a 52-week placebo-controlled randomised double-blind study with r-hu-Epo in 70 patients with active RA and ACD. Furthermore, the relation between anaemia as assessed by haemoglobin levels (Hb), disease activity as assessed with the Disease Activity Score (DAS), and utilities was investigated. Compared to the placebo group, significant improvement of Hb (P < 0.001), DAS (P = 0.01) and rating scale utilities (P = 0.002), but not of standard gamble utilities, was observed in the Epo group. Rating scale utilities correlated strongly with DAS (r = -0.47, P < 0.01), Hb (r = 0.37, P < 0.01) and changes in both DAS (r = -0.74, P < 0.01) and Hb (r = 0.44, P < 0.01). Both DAS and Hb contributed significantly to the variance in rating scale utilities (21% and 3% respectively) and to changes in rating scale utilities (43% and 3% respectively). Standard gamble utilities correlated less well with clinical disease variables than rating scale utilities did. These results indicate, that r-hu-Epo improves utility-derived health-related quality of life, most probably by improving both disease activity and anaemia. Utilities, particularly rating scale utilities, correlated well with conventional disease activity variables and proved sensitive to change. Utilities may be a useful tool for investigating quality of life in RA-patients.

Methodological issues of patient utility measurement. Experience from two clinical trials.

This article explores various methodological issues of patient utility measurement in two randomized controlled clinical trials involving 85 patients with fibromyalgia and 144 with ankylosing spondylitis. In both trials one baseline and two follow-up measurements of the patients' preferences for their own health state and several hypothetical states were performed using the rating scale and the standard gamble methods. It was confirmed that standard gamble scores are consistently higher than rating scale scores for both the experienced and the hypothetical states. The 3-month test-retest reliability for hypothetical states measured by intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.24 to 0.33 for the rating scale and from 0.43 to 0.70 for the standard gamble. Although the reproducibility is not high, the group mean scores are fairly stable over time. Mean standard gamble scores tend to differ depending on the way the measurements are undertaken. Utilities elicited with chained gambles were significantly higher than utilities elicited with basic reference gambles. At the individual level some inconsistent responses occurred. However, more than 70% of these fell within the bounds of the measurement error, which ranged from 0.11 to 0.13 on the standard gamble (0-1 scale) and from 8 to 10 on the rating scale (0-100 scale). The large number of negative utilities for the severe hypothetical state, which was used as an anchor point in the chained gambles, and the magnitude of these negative utilities (down to -19) calls for intensified research efforts to handle these responses in utility calculations.

Health related utility measurement in rheumatology: an introduction.

Utility measures of health-related quality of life are preference values that patients attach to their overall health status. In clinical trials, utility measures summarize both positive and negative effects of an intervention into one single value between 0 (equal to death) and 1 (equal to perfect health). These measures allow for comparison of patient outcomes of different diseases and allow for comparison between various health care interventions. There are two different approaches to utility measurement. The first is to classify patients into categories based on their responses to a number of questions about their functional status, as for instance the Quality of Well-Being questionnaire. The second approach is to ask patients to assign a single rating to their overall health by means of rating scale, standard gamble, time trade-off, or willingness to pay. The Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) as outcome measure includes both effects in terms of quality and quantity of life. Utilities are used as weights to adjust life years for the quality of life in order to calculate QALYs. Both QALYs and utilities are useful in decision-making regarding appropriate procedures for groups of patients.

Psychologic distress as a longterm predictor of medical utilisation.

OBJECTIVE: To study baseline psychologic distress as a predictor of self-reported medical utilisation after nine years of follow-up. METHODS: in 1975-1978 we measured psychologic distress with a neuroticism scale in a general population sample of 826 women aged forty-five to sixty-four years. In the same study, and in a follow-up study nine years later, medical utilisation was quantified as the main outcome in terms of current treatment by a physician and current use of medication. RESULTS: The age and educational class adjusted odds ratio of baseline physician contact and use of medication for the upper versus the lower quintile of the neuroticism score were 3.3 (95% confidence interval (c.i.): 2.0-5.2) and 3.6 (95% c.i.: 2.2-5.7), respectively. When the baseline neuroticism scores were related to utilisation at follow-up the adjusted odds ratios were 2.1 (95% c.i.: 1.2-3.1) and 2.8 (95% c.i.: 1.8-4.5). However, in the subgroup of 352 women who did not report initial medical utilisation the odds ratios were 1.1 (95% c.i.: 0.5-2.4) and 1.4 (95% c.i.: 0.6-3.1). CONCLUSION: Although an association between psychologic distress and medical utilisation was confirmed, psychologic distress did not predict utilisation in middle-aged women characterised at baseline as non-utilizers.