CT arthrography of the intra-articular long head of biceps tendon: Diagnostic performance outside the labral-bicipital complex.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of CT arthrography for the diagnosis of intra-articular long head of biceps (LHB) tendon intrinsic lesions using arthroscopy findings as standard of reference. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT arthrography studies of 98 patients (55 men, 43 women; mean age 54.8±12.7 [SD] years [range: 16-77 years]) were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists independently. Per operative arthroscopic images and surgical reports were retrospectively reviewed by a shoulder-specialist surgeon. Based on the analysis of arthroscopic images and the surgical reports, the LHB tendon was classified as normal (continuous with uniform tendon thickness), tendinopathy/partial rupture (focal change in tendon thickness and contour irregularities) and total rupture (total loss in tendon continuity). Imaging results were compared to those of surgery that served as standard of reference. Interobserver agreement was assessed. RESULTS: At arthroscopy, the LHB tendon was classified as normal in 38/98 (38.8%) patients, tendinopathic in 51/52 (52%) and totally ruptured in 9/98 (9.2%). The sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography for the diagnosis of LHB tendinopathy were respectively 74% (95%CI: 60%-85%) and 93% (95%CI: 80%-99%) for reader 1 and 79% (95% CI: 67%-89%) and 95% (95% CI: 83%-99%) for reader 2. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of LHB tendon total ruptures were 100% (95%CI: 66%-100%) and 93% (95%CI: 86%-98%) for both readers. Interobserver agreements for the identification of the LHB tendon tendinopathy and total ruptures were excellent (kappa values of 0.94 and 0.96, respectively). CONCLUSION: CT arthrography demonstrates good sensitivity and excellent specificity for the detection of intra-articular LHB tendinopathy and tear.

CT of hip prosthesis: New techniques and new paradigms.

Patients with hip pain after joint replacement are first assessed by analyzing the clinical presentation and conventional radiography findings. When this first step is inconclusive, various different imaging techniques can be used to identify the anomalies. Based on our experience, computed tomography (CT) is the cornerstone for diagnosing the main prosthesis-related complications. In this article, we describe the different CT techniques used for this kind of investigation and provide indications for each technique.