ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that BCD-057 is similar to innovator adalimumab (iADA) in terms of efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in steady state in the target population of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (NCT02762955). METHODS: Patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive 80 mg of BCD-057 or iADA at week 0 and 40 mg thereafter every other week from week 1. At week 24 patients from iADA group were re-randomized (1:1) to continue iADA or to be switched to BCD-057. The primary efficacy endpoint was 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index from baseline (PASI 75), secondary endpoints included PASI percent improvement and relative change in affected Body Surface Area (BSA) from baseline at weeks 16, 24, 33, and 55. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and antidrug antibodies. Pharmacokinetics was evaluated at steady state. RESULTS: Overall, 346 adult patients were included in the study (174/172 patients in BCD-057/iADA arms, respectively). At week 16 PASI 75 was achieved by 60.34% and 63.37% of patients in BCD-057 and iADA arms, respectively (p = 0.5622). Bounds of the calculated 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between PASI 75 responses in arms [-13.26%; 7.2%] fall within the equivalence margin [-15% to 15%] demonstrating equivalent efficacy of BCD-057 and iADA. At week 55 81.61%, 85.56%, and 80.49% of patients in BCD-057, iADA and iADA/BCD-057 arms achieved PASI 75. Comparison of the secondary endpoints did not show significant differences between arms. A comparable pharmacokinetics was shown at steady state. Safety profiles and proportions of patients with antidrug antibodies were similar between arms. The switch from the iADA to BCD-057 did not affect the immunogenicity profile. CONCLUSION: Obtained data demonstrate that BCD-057 and iADA are highly similar in clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Subject(s)
Adalimumab , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Adalimumab/chemistry , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/immunology , Psoriasis/metabolism , Psoriasis/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Netakimab (NTK), an original humanized anti-interleukin-17 monoclonal antibody, showed therapeutic efficacy in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a phase 2 clinical study. Herein we report the results of 54 weeks of a phase 3 PLANETA trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two NTK regimens vs. placebo. METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive NTK 120 mg once every 2 weeks (NTK Q2W), NTK 120 mg once every 4 weeks (NTK Q4W) or placebo. During the first 3 weeks, patients received subcutaneous injections of NTK or placebo (according to the allocation) once a week. Patients in the NTK Q2W group then received NTK at weeks 4, 6, 8 and 10. Subjects in the NTK Q4W group received NTK at weeks 6 and 10 and placebo at weeks 4 and 8. Patients in the placebo group received placebo injections at weeks 4, 6, 8 and 10. Treatment was unblinded at week 12. During the open-label phase, patients in both NTK groups continued to receive NTK Q4W. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients in each group who achieved a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI 75) at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 77.7%, 83.3% and 0% of patients had a PASI 75 response at week 12 in the NTK Q2W, NTK Q4W and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test, ITT). The effect was maintained throughout the 1-year treatment. NTK showed a good safety profile and low immunogenicity. CONCLUSION: Treatment with NTK results in high rates of sustained clinical response in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The study is ongoing; thus, long-term use efficacy and safety data are forthcoming. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03390101).
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Data regarding disease burden and quality of life (QoL) for patients with psoriasis from Russia are limited. The objective of this study was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and treatment patterns of systemic therapy eligible psoriasis patients in Russia in order to assess the impact of psoriasis on the QoL and work productivity of the patients and to evaluate patient/dermatologist concordance on disease severity, signs/symptoms, and satisfaction with psoriasis treatment. METHODS: Data were collected by the Growth from Knowledge Disease Atlas global real-world evidence programme from nine countries. The data from the Russian population are presented here. Adult patients who had a current or prior history of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and were receiving prescription treatment at the time of the survey were included. Dermatologist-reported data on disease severity, symptoms, comorbidities, and treatment as well as patient-reported data on QoL and work productivity were collected. Descriptive analysis of the data was conducted. Patient/dermatologist concordance was assessed using Cohen's κ. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients from Russia were included. The mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score was 9.0 and the mean disease duration was 9.9 years. The proportion of patients with itch, skin pain, and comorbidities increased as current psoriasis severity increased. The disease had a negative impact on patients' QoL (mean Dermatology Life Quality Index score: 7.1) and work productivity (33.2% drop in work productivity), which further deteriorated as disease severity increased. A large proportion of the enrolled patients (60%) were treated with topical agents only. Overall, the level of concordance between patients and their dermatologists regarding psoriasis severity and satisfaction with overall disease control achieved was low. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate a substantial disease burden on psoriasis patients in Russia, despite receiving treatment for their psoriasis, as well as low patient/dermatologist concordance of views on treatment outcomes. These findings also highlight a need to further incorporate the patient's views into treatment decision-making in Russia. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.