Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(3): 101534, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36481393

ABSTRACT

Venous vascular diseases are an important clinical entity estimated to affect several million people worldwide. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common venous disease with a population variable prevalence of 122 to 160 persons per 100,000 per year, whereas pulmonary embolism (PE) affects up to 60 to 70 per 100 000 and carries much higher mortality. Chronic venous diseases, which cause symptoms like leg swelling, heaviness, pain, and discomfort, are most prevalent in the elderly and significantly impact their quality of life. Some estimate that chronic vascular diseases account for up to 2% of healthcare budgets in Western countries. Treating venous vascular disease includes using systemic anticoagulation and interventional therapies in some patient subsets. In this comprehensive review, we discuss endovascular treatment modalities in the management of venous vascular diseases.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Aged , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Quality of Life , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Risk Factors
2.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 47(2): 100934, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384618

ABSTRACT

The spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic across the globe and the United States presented unprecedented challenges with dawn of new policies to reserve resources and protect the public. One of the major policies adopted by hospitals across the nations were postponement of non-emergent procedures such as transaortic valve replacement (TAVR), left atrial appendage closure device (LAAC), MitraClip and CardioMEMS. Guidelines were based mainly on the avoidable clinical outcomes occurring during COVID-19 era. As our understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 evolved, advanced cardiac procedures may safely continue through careful advanced coordination. We aim to highlight the new guidelines published by different major cardiovascular societies, and discuss solutions to safely perform procedures to improve outcomes in a patient population with high acuity of illness during the COVID-19 pandemic era.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
3.
Clin Transplant ; 36(3): e14545, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817905

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), noninvasive markers that predict morbidity and mortality are limited. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) increases with hepatic fibrosis; however, it may be falsely elevated in patients with ADHF in the absence of liver disease. We investigated whether elevated LSM predicts cardiac outcomes in ADHF. METHODS: In a prospective study, we examined 52 ADHF patients without liver disease between 2016 and 2017. Patients underwent liver 2D shear wave elastography (SWE) and were followed for 12 months to assess the outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD), heart transplant (HT) or death. RESULTS: The median LSM was elevated in patients who received an LVAD or HT within 30-days compared to those who did not (median [IQR]: 55.6 [22.5 - 63.4] vs 13.8 [9.5 - 40.3] kPa, p = .049). Moreover, the risk of composite outcome was highest in the 3rd tertile (> 39.8 kPa compared to 1st and 2nd combined, HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.20- 6.67, p = .02). Each 1-kPa increase in LSM was associated with a 1%-increase in the incidence rate of readmissions (IRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: LSM may serve as a novel noninvasive tool to determine LVAD, HT, or death in patients with ADHF.


Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Heart Failure , Liver Diseases , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/surgery , Humans , Liver/pathology , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/pathology , Liver Diseases/pathology , Prospective Studies
4.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 46(12): 100843, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33994024

ABSTRACT

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) mainly affects people in developing, low-income countries. However, due to globalization and migration, developed countries are now seeing more cases of RHD. In RHD patients who develop severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, surgical aortic valve replacement remains the treatment of choice. In the past decade, there has been an extension of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to intermediate-risk and lower-risk patients with aortic stenosis. This review suggests the possible utility of TAVR for the treatment of rheumatic aortic stenosis. Rheumatic aortic stenosis has been excluded from major TAVR studies due to the predominantly noncalcific pathology of the rheumatic aortic valve. However, there have been case reports and case series showing successful implantation of the valve even in patients with and without significant leaflet calcification. In this review article, we summarize the latest evidence of severe rheumatic aortic stenosis treated with TAVR and discuss the procedure's impact on patient care, safety, and efficacy.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Calcinosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Humans , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL