A New Genetic Risk Score to Predict the Outcome of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line Exemestane: Results From a Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 50% of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with first-line exemestane do not show objective response and currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients using this therapy. The constitutive genetic background might be responsible for differences in the outcome of exemestane-treated patients. We designed a prospective study to investigate the role of germ line polymorphisms as biomarkers of survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred two locally advanced or MBC patients treated with first-line exemestane were genotyped for 74 germ line polymorphisms in 39 candidate genes involved in drug activity, hormone balance, DNA replication and repair, and cell signaling pathways. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were tested with multivariate Cox regression. Bootstrap resampling was used as an internal assessment of results reproducibility. RESULTS: Cytochrome P450 19A1-rs10046TC/CC, solute carrier organic anion transporter 1B1-rs4149056TT, adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily G member 2-rs2046134GG, fibroblast growth factor receptor-4-rs351855TT, and X-ray repair cross complementing 3-rs861539TT were significantly associated with PFS and then combined into a risk score (0-1, 2, 3, or 4-6 risk points). Patients with the highest risk score (4-6 risk points) compared with ones with the lowest score (0-1 risk points) had a median PFS of 10 months versus 26.3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [AdjHR], 3.12 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.18-4.48]; P < .001) and a median OS of 38.9 months versus 63.0 months (AdjHR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.22-4.79], P = .012), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study we defined a score including 5 polymorphisms to stratify patients for PFS and OS. This score, if validated, might be translated to personalize locally advanced or MBC patient treatment and management.

A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients with associated diseases.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are generally underrepresented in the study populations of combination chemotherapy trials. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFOX regimen in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer and presenting associated disease(s). METHODS: A total of 43 patients aged ≥70 years received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) together with 6S-leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by a 46-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m(2), every 2 weeks. Assessment of response was performed every four cycles according to RECIST criteria. RESULTS: Median patient age was 74 years (range, 70-83 years). Overall response rate was 34.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.6-49.1, with 3 complete responses and 12 partial responses. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 4 patients (9.3%), fatigue in 3 patients (7.0%), and vomiting in 2 patients (4.6%). Grade 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathy was observed in 5 patients (11.6%) and 1 patient (2.3%), respectively. No treatment-related death was observed. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.8 and 10.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This modified FOLFOX regimen is an active and well-tolerated treatment for elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer and also represents a good therapeutic option in patients with associated disease(s).

Sequential chemotherapy with cisplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by docetaxel in previously untreated patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has demonstrated a survival advantage over cisplatin and 5-FU, but with substantial hematological toxicity. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a sequential regimen with cisplatin, leucovorin, and 5-FU (PLF) followed by docetaxel in metastatic gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Treatment consisted of 4 cycles of biweekly PLF (cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) as a 30-min infusion on day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) in a 2-h infusion, and 5-FU 2,800 mg/m(2) in a 48-h continuous infusion starting on day 1) followed, in cases of response or stable disease, by 3 cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, with an average age of 64 years (range 34-69). The main cumulative grade 3-4 toxicities were: neutropenia (38.2%), febrile neutropenia (11.8%), and fatigue (14.7%). After the planned 7 cycles of treatment, the overall response rate was 38.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9-54.6), with 3 complete and 10 partial responses. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.8 and 10.6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with metastatic gastric cancer, the sequential administration of cisplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU, and docetaxel may be an effective palliative option and offers a far more favorable toxicity profile than the simultaneous use of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU.

Early and Complete Response of Bone Metastases, Documented by FDG-PET/CT Scan, in a Patient With NSCLC.

In this case report we describe the case of a patient with multiple bone metastases of NSCLC, adenocarcinoma with exon 21 point-mutation of EGFR, treated with gefitinib. After only 3 months, FDG-PET/CT scan showed a complete response of bone metastases and right hylar adenopathy. Implications for need of early use of FDG-PET/CT scan after gefitinib treatment are discussed.

High safety profile and activity of oral vinorelbine in an elderly patient with metastatic breast cancer.

Visceral metastases of breast cancer have been commonly treated with "aggressive" anthracyclines/taxanes-based chemotherapy. In contrast, this case report concerns an elderly patient with advanced breast cancer (pleural effusion, peritoneal carcinosis, and bone metastases) who firmly declined intravenous chemotherapy and was treated for a long time (28 months) with oral vinorelbine. The oral formulation of this drug had activity and a high safety profile, enabling the patient's wishes to be respected.

HtrA1, a potential predictor of response to cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

AIMS: HtrA1 is a member of the HtrA (high-temperature requirement factor A) family of serine proteases. HtrA1 plays a protective role in various malignancies due to its tumour suppressive properties. The aim of this study was to determine HtrA1 expression as a predictor of chemoresponse in patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: HtrA1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry on specimens of primary gastric cancer from 80 patients treated consecutively with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. Response to chemotherapy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria. Our population consisted of males/females [51/29; median age 64 years (range 32-82)]. A complete or partial response was observed in 71.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 54.7-88.2], 66.7% (95% CI 47.8-85.5) and 28.6% (95 CI 11.8-45.3) of tumours showing high, medium and low HtrA1 expression, respectively. A statistically significant association between HtrA1 expression and the clinical response was observed (P = 0.002). The median overall survival for patients with high/medium expression was 17 months compared to 9.5 months for patients with low HtrA1 expression (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of HtrA1 in gastric cancer prior to chemotherapy indicates that levels of HtrA1 could be used to predict response to platinum-based combination therapies. Further assessment of HtrA1 expression is highly warranted in large, prospective studies.

Activity and safety of erlotinib as second- and third-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Efficacy of this drug was documented in the BR.21 trial showing that adenocarcinoma, female gender, Asian ethnicity and never-smoker status are predictive of clinical response to erlotinib. Retrospective studies documented the same benefits for elderly patients as young patients in terms of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The primary aim of our trial was to confirm these findings in a prospective way; the secondary aim was to identify if the aforementioned clinical characteristics may be predictive of response even in elderly patients. The trial included 31 patients with pretreated stage IIIB (2) and IV (29) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Median age was 75 years (range: 65-85). Twenty-seven patients were current/former-smokers and four never-smokers. Twenty-three patients are evaluable for response. Objective response rates were reported in five patients (16%). Five patients had stable disease (16%) and 13 progressive disease (43%). Seven patients had a "clinical benefit" from erlotinib (22.5%; 95% C.I.: 7.9-37.2%). Grade 3 skin rash was recorded in three patients (10%). Median survival was 9 months (range 1-30). Median time to progression was 3 months (range: 1-24 months). Our study confirmed erlotinib activity and safety as second- and third-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, especially in terms of median survival. Even though this trial does not allow us to draw a definitive conclusion about the role of a particular clinical characteristic predictive of response, the "clinical benefit" was documented especially in females, in patients with adenocarcinoma histology and skin rash, confirming previous retrospective data.

Weekly paclitaxel in elderly patients (aged > or = 70 years) with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an alternative choice? Results of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy is considered to be a standard approach for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In recent years, weekly paclitaxel has been widely used for its safety profile, especially in breast and ovarian cancer. Otherwise, only a few studies are available in NSCLC. The aim of our study was to investigate the activity and safety of weekly paclitaxel in elderly patients with locally advanced (stage IIIB) and metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients entered the study; 10 had stage IIIB disease (5 "wet" and 5 "dry"), and 17 had stage IV disease. Median age was 73 years (range, 70-83 years). Sixteen patients (59%) presented with comorbidities. The schedule was weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for 6 weeks with 2 weeks of rest (1 cycle). RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity; a median of 1 cycle was administered (range, 1-5 cycles). Partial responses were recorded in 9 patients (37.5%; 33.3%, according to intention-to- treat analysis; 95% CI, 15.5%-51.1%); 7 had stable disease (29%), and 8 had progressive disease (33.5%). Median time to progression was 5 months (range, 1-23 months), and median survival was 12 months (range, 1-36 months). Grade 2/3 asthenia was the main toxicity in 7 patients (29%); a hypersensitivity reaction presented in 1 patient. No other episode of grade 3/4 toxicity was recorded. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly is active in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC with a good safety profile; this schedule might be considered an alternative choice to gemcitabine or vinorelbine as first-line treatment in elderly patients, particularly patients with comorbidities. Phase III studies that compare these third-generation drugs are warranted to draw definitive conclusion about the best approach in these patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with low dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus weekly paclitaxel in operable and locally advanced breast cancer.

To determine the activity and safety of a schedule with a low dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and weekly paclitaxel in operable and locally advanced breast cancer patients. Thirty-five patients with histologically confirmed, operable, and locally advanced breast cancer entered the study. The median age was 59 years (range 31-74 years). The schedule was biweekly PLD at the dose of 15 mg/m for four administrations and weekly paclitaxel at the dose of 80 mg/m for eight administrations. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Twenty-six patients responded (74%): three (8%) had a complete response and 23 (66%) had a partial response, seven (23%) remained stable, and one experienced progression (3%). Fifteen of 27 operable patients (55%) underwent conservative surgery. Three patients (9%) had a pathological complete response and the disappearance of infiltrating disease was documented in three other patients. The main toxicity was hand-foot syndrome (grade 3 in four patients; 11%). Other nonhematological grade 3 toxicities included stomatitis in three patients (8%) and liver toxicity in one patient (3%). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was documented in another three patients and dose reduction was necessary in two patients. The fourth administration of PLD was suspended in four patients for grade 2-3 hand-foot syndrome. No symptoms were related to impairment of cardiac function and no death related to toxicity occurred. The combination of biweekly PLD and weekly paclitaxel was active in operable and locally advanced breast cancer with a manageable safety profile.

A phase II study of single-agent oral vinorelbine in patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Intravenous vinorelbine has demonstrated its efficacy and tolerability in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An oral formulation of vinorelbine has been developed, and a number of phase II studies have shown its activity in chemotherapy-naive NSCLC, even in elderly patients, but no study has been performed to test activity and toxicity of oral vinorelbine in pretreated patients. The aims of our study were to investigate the activity and toxicity of oral vinorelbine in patients with NSCLC as salvage treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty pretreated patients with locally advanced (n = 6) and metastatic (n = 14) NSCLC entered the study. The schedule was oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) once a week until progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Median age was 70 years (range, 49-84 years). RESULTS: Seventeen patients were evaluable for response and all for toxicity. A median of 9 cycles were administered (range, 2-21 cycles). No objective responses were reported, 5 patients experienced stable disease, and 12 patients had progressive disease. Median time to progression was 2 months (range, 1-6 months), and median survival was 4 months (range, 1-13 months). Treatment was well tolerated, with grade 4 neutropenia in 1 patient (heavily pretreated); grade 2 diarrhea in 2 patients; asthenia in 2 patients; and abdominal pain in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) once a week is a very safe schedule in heavily pretreated locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC; however, at this dose, the drug is inactive. Other phase II studies with oral vinorelbine 80 mg/m(2) weekly are warranted.

Safety profile and activity of lower capecitabine dose in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine is an orally administered precursor of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine that was rationally designed to generate 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) preferentially in tumor tissue. The drug enables chronic dosing that mimics continuous infusion of 5-FU. Phase II trials of capecitabine at 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest, is active in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients; the main toxicity is palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, diarrhea, and nausea. To overcome these side effects, the dose has been reduced to 1000 mg/m2 twice daily with a better therapeutic profile and encouraging efficacy. The aim of our study was to confirm safety and activity of capecitabine at lower doses in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced breast cancer entered the study. The first 7 patients were treated with capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily (for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest) and the next 30 patients with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2. The median age was 62 years (range, 38-87 years). Thirteen patients were chemotherapy naive and 24 were pretreated with chemotherapy (9 patients, 1 line; 15 patients, > or = 2 lines). Anthracyclines and/or taxane schedules were administered in 22 patients. Soft tissue metastases were documented in 36 patients; visceral metastases in 24 patients; visceral and soft tissue metastases in 23 patients. RESULTS: Thirty patients were evaluable for response (5 at "higher" dose and 25 at "lower" dose) and all for toxicity. Overall objective response rate was 57% (5 complete responses and 12 partial responses); 95% CI, 39%-74%; stable disease 20% and progressive disease 23%. Eight of 13 chemotherapy-naive patients (61.5%) and 9 of 24 pretreated patients (37.5%) responded to capecitabine, according to the intent-to-treat principle (6 of 9 responses were obtained at a lower dose). Three responses at the "higher" dose and 14 at the "lower" dose were reported. Median time to progression was 7 months (range, 1-38 months) and median overall survival was 19 months (range, 2-47 months). Toxicity was as follows: grade 2/3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia in 9 patients (24%), grade 2/3 asthenia in 7 patients (19%), grade 2 vomiting in 4 patients (11%), grade 2 renal toxicity in 1 patient, grade 2 skin reaction in 1 patient, and suspected cardiac toxicity in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that a lower dose of capecitabine has a good toxicity profile and is active in patients with MBC.

Vascular endothelial growth factor and p53 expressions in liver and abdominal metastases from colon cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between p53 overexpression and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) upregulation in liver and abdominal metastases from colon cancer. The analysis in the two metastatic sites was carried out to evaluate the potential role of microenvironment in the molecular regulation of VEGF. METHODS: Bioptic specimens of liver and abdominal metastases from colon carcinomas were examined by immunohistochemistry for p53 and VEGF expressions. Consecutive cases with assessable tumor tissue were selected. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 24 cases having liver metastases and 34 cases having abdominal metastases. Abdominal metastases showed a higher number of VEGF-positive cases and a higher intensity of VEGF immunoreactivity than liver metastases did (p = 0.01). The combined analysis of p53 and VEGF showed a strong association between the two markers in the 24 liver metastases; 9 cases were VEGF positive/p53 positive and 15 cases were VEGF negative/p53 negative. This relationship was not found in the 34 abdominal metastases, which showed concordance between the two markers in 9 VEGF-positive/p53-positive cases only. CONCLUSIONS: Microenvironment factors like hypoxia may have a predominant role in inducing VEGF expression and they can override the molecular control of p53 on VEGF.

Neuroprotective effect of reduced glutathione on oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of glutathione (GSH) in the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients treated with a bimonthly oxaliplatin-based regimen were randomized to receive GSH (1,500 mg/m(2) over a 15-minute infusion period before oxaliplatin) or normal saline solution. Clinical neurologic evaluation and electrophysiologic investigations were performed at baseline and after four (oxaliplatin dose, 400 mg/m(2)), eight (oxaliplatin dose, 800 mg/m(2)), and 12 (oxaliplatin dose, 1,200 mg/m(2)) cycles of treatment. RESULTS: At the fourth cycle, seven patients showed clinically evident neuropathy in the GSH arm, whereas 11 patients in the placebo arm did. After the eighth cycle, nine of 21 assessable patients in the GSH arm suffered from neurotoxicity compared with 15 of 19 in the placebo arm. With regard to grade 2 to 4 National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria, 11 patients experienced neuropathy in the placebo arm compared with only two patients in the GSH arm (P =.003). After 12 cycles, grade 2 to 4 neurotoxicity was observed in three patients in the GSH arm and in eight patients in the placebo arm (P =.004). The neurophysiologic investigations (sural sensory nerve conduction) showed a statistically significant reduction of the values in the placebo arm but not in the GSH arm. The response rate was 26.9% in the GSH arm and 23.1% in the placebo arm, showing no reduction in activity of oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that GSH is a promising drug for the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, and that it does not reduce the clinical activity of oxaliplatin.