Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 11(7): e050321, 2021 07 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34281931

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe mortality of in-hospital patients with COVID-19 and compare risk factors between survivors and non-survivors. DESIGN: Prospective cohort of adult inpatients. SETTING: Tertiary healthcare teaching hospital in Guadalajara, Mexico. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with confirmed COVID-19 hospitalised from 25 March to 7 September 2020 were included. End of study: 7 November 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient survival analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and comparison of factors by the log-rank test. Mortality risk factors analysed by multivariate Cox's proportional-hazard model. RESULTS: One thousand ten patients included: 386 (38%) died, 618 (61%) alive at discharge and six (0.6%) remained hospitalised. There was predominance of men (63%) and high frequency of overweight-obesity (71%); hypertension (54%); diabetes (40%); and lung (9%), cardiovascular (8%) and kidney diseases (11%); all of them significantly more frequent in non-survivors. Overweight-obesity was not different between groups, but severity of disease (Manchester Triage System and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) was significantly worse in non-survivors, who were also significantly older (65 vs 45 years, respectively) and had haematological, biochemical, coagulation and inflammatory biomarkers more altered than survivors. Mortality predictors were invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV; OR 3.31, p<0.0001), admission to intensive care unit (ICU; OR 2.18, p<0.0001), age (OR 1.02, p<0.0001), Manchester Triage System (urgent OR 1.44, p=0.02; immediate/very urgent OR 2.02, p=0.004), baseline C reactive protein (CRP; OR 1.002, p=0.009) and antecedent of kidney disease (OR 1.58, p=0.04) CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in this emerging country centre seemed to be higher than in developed countries. Patients displayed a high frequency of risk factors for poor outcome, but the need for IMV, ICU admission, older age, more severe disease at admission, antecedent of kidney disease and higher CRP levels significantly predicted mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Cir Cir ; 88(3): 306-313, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32538999

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the distribution of the veins, it corresponds in the path and by its affluent to their arterial counterpart. For the pelvic surgeon faced with pelvic surgical pathology, the knowledge of the distribution of the venous vessels is especially important in view of novel surgical techniques and current approaches. The majority of the reports are on common iliac vein (CIV) or the inferior vena cava. To the best of our knowledge, there are no papers describing posterior extrapelvic affluents that drain into the internal iliac vein (IIV). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to describe the pattern of the constitution of the IIV in 17 dissection specimens taken at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We dissected and registered the anatomic variations of the posterior extrapelvic tributaries to the IIVs. RESULTS: Moreover, we describe the presence of a vein here that is, as far as we know, the first report of a vein that is formed from the posterior extrapelvic veins that drain exactly onto the anterior surface of the CIV. We also describe herein the variants that we have found. CONCLUSIONS: The ignorance of the anatomic variations in the posterior extra-pelvic tributaries to the IIVs (internal iliac veins) can lead to fatal consequences in the patients undergoing pelvic surgery.


ANTECEDENTES: En la descripción de los trayectos venosos, estos corresponden casi exactamente a la distribución de su contraparte arterial, como es el caso de la vena iliaca interna. Para el cirujano que se enfrenta a la patología pélvica, el conocimiento de la distribución de los vasos venosos es de particular importancia. Los reportes que describen los grandes vasos venosos pélvicos se enfocan en las venas iliacas comunes o la vena cava inferior. En nuestro conocimiento, no existen ­reportes que describan los afluentes venosos posteriores que drenan a la vena iliaca interna ni las distancias que separan los vasos entre sí. OBJETIVO: Describir el patrón de constitución de la vena iliaca interna en 17 especímenes cadavéricos disecados en nuestra institución. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se identificaron los trayectos vasculares de los afluentes venosos posteriores extrapélvicos de las venas iliacas primitivas. RESULTADOS: En específico, describimos la presencia de una variante venosa que, hasta donde hemos revisado, es el primer reporte, pues esta vena posterior extrapélvica drena exactamente en la superficie anterior de la vena iliaca común. También describimos otras variantes encontradas. CONCLUSIONES: Conocer las variantes de los afluentes venosos posteriores extrapélvicos es de vital importancia para el cirujano que realiza cirugía pélvica.


Subject(s)
Iliac Vein/anatomy & histology , Biological Variation, Individual , Biological Variation, Population , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Iliac Vein/abnormalities , Male , Vena Cava, Inferior/anatomy & histology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...