Current Management of Desmoid Tumors: A Review.

Importance: Desmoid tumor (DT) is a rare and locally aggressive monoclonal, fibroblastic proliferation characterized by a variable and often unpredictable clinical course. Previously, surgery was the standard primary treatment modality; however, within the past decade, a paradigm shift toward less-invasive management has been introduced and an effort to harmonize the strategy among clinicians has been made. To update the 2020 global evidence-based consensus guideline on the management of patients with DT, the Desmoid Tumor Working Group convened a 1-day consensus meeting in Milan, Italy, on June 30, 2023, under the auspices of the European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers and Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network, the Desmoid Foundation Italy, and the Desmoid Tumor Research Foundation. The meeting brought together over 90 adult and pediatric sarcoma experts from different disciplines as well as patients and patient advocates from around the world. Observations: The 2023 update of the global evidence-based consensus guideline focused on the positioning of local therapies alongside surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment algorithm as well as the positioning of the newest class of medical agents, such as γ-secretase inhibitors. Literature searches of MEDLINE and Embase databases were performed for English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies to obtain data to support the consensus recommendations. Of the 18 full-text articles retrieved, only 4 articles met the inclusion criteria. The 2023 consensus guideline is informed by a number of new aspects, including data for local ablative therapies such as cryotherapy; other indications for surgery; and the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat, the first representative of the newest class of medical agents and first approved drug for DT. Management of DT is complex and should be carried out exclusively in designated DT referral centers equipped with a multidisciplinary tumor board. Selection of the appropriate strategy should consider DT-related symptoms, associated risks, tumor location, disease morbidities, available treatment options, and preferences of individual patients. Conclusions and Relevance: The therapeutic armamentarium of DT therapy is continually expanding. It is imperative to carefully select the management strategy for each patient with DT to optimize tumor control and enhance quality of life.

Are We Ready for Life in the Fast Lane? A Critical Review of Preoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

This critical review aims to summarize the relevant published data regarding hypofractionation regimens for preoperative radiation therapy (RT) prior to surgery for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity or superficial trunk. We identified peer-reviewed publications using a PubMed search on the MeSH headings of "soft tissue sarcoma" AND "hypofractionated radiation therapy." To obtain complication data on similar anatomical radiotherapeutic scenarios we also searched "hypofractionated radiation therapy" AND "melanoma" as well as "hypofractionated radiation therapy" AND "breast cancer." We then used reference lists from relevant articles to obtain additional pertinent publications. We also incorporated relevant abstracts presented at international sarcoma meetings and relevant clinical trials as listed on the ClinicalTrials.gov website. Detailed data are presented and contextualized for ultra-hypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated regimens with respect to local control, wound complications, and amputation rates. Comparative data are also presented for late toxicities including: fibrosis, joint limitation, edema, skin integrity, and bone fracture or necrosis. These data are compared to a standard regimen of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions delivered over 5 weeks. This analysis supports the continued use of a standard regimen for preoperative RT for STS of 25 × 2 Gy over 5 weeks without concurrent chemotherapy. Use of concurrent chemotherapy with preoperative RT for STS should be reserved for well-designed clinical trials. A randomized trial of ultra-hypofractionated and moderately hypofractionated pre op RT for STS is warranted, but it is critical for the primary endpoint (or co-primary endpoint) to be late toxicity to: bone, soft tissue, joint, and skin.

Distribution and Rate of Myxoid Liposarcoma Spine Metastases: Impact on Surveillance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Myxoid liposarcoma (LPS) has a unique tendency to spread to extrapulmonary sites, including osseous sites such as the spine, and adjacent sites such as the paraspinous tissue. No clear consensus exists to guide the approach to imaging in these patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the rate and distribution of spine metastases in patients with myxoid LPS and detection modality. METHODS: Records of all patients with myxoid LPS evaluated at our sarcoma center were retrospectively reviewed. Disease patterns and imaging modality utilization were analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2020, 164 patients with myxoid LPS were identified. The majority (n = 148, 90%) presented with localized disease, with half (n = 82, 50%) of all patients developing metastases or recurrence during their disease course. With a median follow-up of 69.2 months, spine/paraspinous metastases developed in 38 patients (23%), of whom 35 (92%) already had synchronous, non-spine metastases. Spine disease was only visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as opposed to other imaging modalities, for over one-quarter of patients with spine metastases (n = 10). For patients with metastatic disease, spine metastases were associated with worse median overall survival (2.1 vs. 8.7 years, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Spine metastases occurred in nearly one-quarter of patients with myxoid LPS and represented an advanced disease state, as they primarily presented in the setting of synchronous, non-spine metastases, and were associated with worse overall survival. Routine surveillance with spine MRI in patients with localized disease likely provides no benefit but may be considered in those with known metastatic disease.

Preoperative Radiotherapy in Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: EORTC-62092 Trial (STRASS) Versus Off-trial (STREXIT) Results.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on abdominal recurrence-free survival (ARFS) in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma treated in the EORTC-STBSG-62092 (STRASS) phase 3 randomized controlled trial (STRASS cohort) and off-trial (STREXIT cohort) and to pool STRASS and STREXIT data to test the hypothesis that RT improves ARFS in patients with liposarcoma. BACKGROUND: The STRASS trial did not show any difference in ARFS between patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy+surgery (RT+S) versus surgery alone (S). METHODS: All consecutive adult patients not enrolled in STRASS and underwent curative-intent surgery for a primary retroperitoneal sarcoma with or without preoperative RT between 2012 and 2017 (STRASS recruiting period) among ten STRASS-recruiting centres formed the STREXIT cohort. The effect of RT in STREXIT was explored with a propensity score (PS)-matching analysis. Primary endpoint was ARFS defined as macroscopically incomplete resection or abdominal recurrence or death of any cause, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: STRASS included 266 patients, STREXIT included 831 patients (727 after excluding patients who received preoperative chemotherapy, 202 after 1:1 PS-matching). The effect of RT on ARFS in STRASS and 1:1 PS-matched STREXIT cohorts, overall and in patients with liposarcoma, was similar. In the pooled cohort analysis, RT administration was associated with better ARFS in patients with liposarcoma [N=321, hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.89]. In particular, patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 dedifferentiated liposarcoma (G1-2 DDLPS, n=266) treated with RT+S had better ARFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97) while patients with G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma had not. At the current follow-up, there was no association between RT and overall survival or distant metastases-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, preoperative RT was associated with better ARFS in patients with primary well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 DDLPS.

Retrospective observational studies in ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS) community of experts on the minimum requirements for the evaluation of activity of systemic treatments.

BACKGROUND: In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS. METHODS: Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021). RESULTS: Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.

Role of Radiation Therapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma comprises a small subset of all soft tissue sarcoma and includes various histopathologic subtypes, each with unique patterns of behavior and differential risks for local recurrence and hematogenous metastatic spread. The primary treatment modality is surgery, although even with complete macroscopic resection, recurrence is common. The rationale for the addition of radiotherapy to resection is to improve local control; however, the use of radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is controversial, and existing data are suboptimal to guide management. Treatment decisions should be determined with multidisciplinary input and shared decision-making. When used in selected patients, radiation therapy should be delivered preoperatively; postoperative treatment is not recommended.

Management of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but local recurrence is common. Biologic behavior and recurrence patterns differ significantly among histologic types of RPS, with implications for management. The Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published a consensus approach to primary RPS, and to complement this, one for recurrent RPS in 2016. Since then, additional studies have been published, and collaborative discussion is ongoing to address the clinical challenges of local recurrence in RPS. METHODS: An extensive literature search was performed, and the previous consensus statements for recurrent RPS were updated after review by TARPSWG members. The search included the most common RPS histologic types: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. RESULTS: Recurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up evaluation. For appropriately selected patients, resection is safe. Nomograms currently are available to help predict outcome after resection. These and other new findings have been combined with expert recommendations to provide 36 statements, each of which is attributed a level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In this updated document, more emphasis is placed on histologic type and clarification of the intent for surgical treatment, either curative or palliative. Overall, the fundamental tenet of optimal care for patients with recurrent RPS remains individualized treatment after multidisciplinary discussion by an experienced team with expertise in RPS. CONCLUSIONS: Updated consensus recommendations are provided to help guide decision-making for treatment of locally recurrent RPS and better selection of patients who would potentially benefit from surgery.

Role of Radiation Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare, aggressive, and heterogenous tumors, comprising approximately 1% of adult cancers with over 50 different subtypes. The mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) includes surgical resection. The addition of radiation therapy (RT), either preoperatively or postoperatively, has been used to potentially decrease the risk of local recurrence. The recently published results from STRASS (EORTC-STBSG 62092-22092), which randomized patients to receive or not receive preoperative radiation, indicate no abdominal recurrence-free survival benefit (primary endpoint) nor overall survival benefit to date from the addition of preoperative RT prior to surgical resection in patients with RPS. Keeping in mind caveats of subgroup analyses, the data show a significant reduction in local recurrence with radiation therapy in resected patients and non-significant trends toward improved abdominal recurrence-free survival in all patients and improved local control and abdominal recurrence-free survival in patients with liposarcoma and low-grade sarcoma. Given the high rate of local failure with surgery alone, it is possible that higher RT dose and/or selective RT dose painting may improve outcomes. Prior to treatment, the authors encourage multidisciplinary review and discussion of management options at a sarcoma center for patients with RPS. Selective use of RT may be considered for patients at high risk of local recurrence.

Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

PURPOSE: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, and appropriate dose and planning techniques for management of primary, operable, localized, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults. METHODS: The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of RT for management of STS. These questions included indications for RT for STS of the extremity and superficial trunk; considerations for sequencing of RT with respect to surgery, dose of RT, appropriate treatment volumes and techniques; and the role of RT in management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS: Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making are recommended for all cases of STS. RT is recommended for patients in whom there is increased risk of local recurrence of resected STS, particularly if close or microscopically positive margins are anticipated or have occurred. When RT is indicated, preoperative RT is strongly recommended over postoperative RT. Postoperative RT is conditionally recommended in specific clinical circumstances (eg, uncontrolled pain or bleeding) or when the risk of wound complications outweighs that of late toxicity from RT. Routine use of RT in addition to oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is conditionally not recommended. When RT is used for retroperitoneal sarcoma, preoperative RT is recommended, whereas postoperative RT is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for STS in adults. Future studies will ascertain whether alterations in dosing and sequencing may optimize outcomes and quality of life.

Clinical outcomes following high-dose-rate surface applicator brachytherapy for angiosarcoma of scalp and face.

PURPOSE: Angiosarcoma is a sub-type of soft tissue sarcoma, often presenting as a multifocal or diffuse disease process with poor prognosis. This study presents outcomes of a single institution cohort of patients with angiosarcoma of the scalp and face following treatment with multimodality therapy, including high-dose-rate surface applicator (HDR-SA) brachytherapy, and represents the largest cohort utilizing this therapeutic approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients with primary or recurrent angiosarcoma of the face or scalp were treated with HDR-SA brachytherapy between 2003-2018, with clinical characteristics and outcomes collected from medical records and used to identify prognostic features. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 45 months. Patients treated with HDR-SA brachytherapy had a 4-year local control rate of 63%, a 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 20%, and a 4-year overall survival rate of 54%. Disease features associated with worse loco-regional control (LRC) included location on the scalp (vs. face, p = 0.04) and tumor size ≥ 5 cm (p = 0.0099). Outcomes after HDR-SA brachytherapy for salvage therapy vs. HDR-SA brachytherapy as a component of an initial treatment approach were also significantly different, with worse LRC (p = 0.0084) and worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0019) in a setting of salvage therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Local control rates following HDR-SA brachytherapy for scalp or face angiosarcoma are moderate and similar to what is described in the literature using a variety of local control treatment modalities. Smaller tumors and those involving the face rather than scalp had better outcomes. PFS rates were poor and there is a pressing need for treatment intensification and novel therapeutic options.

Ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society community of experts on the incidence threshold and the list of entities.

BACKGROUND: Among sarcomas, which are rare cancers, many types are exceedingly rare; however, a definition of ultra-rare cancers has not been established. The problem of ultra-rare sarcomas is particularly relevant because they represent unique diseases, and their rarity poses major challenges for diagnosis, understanding disease biology, generating clinical evidence to support new drug development, and achieving formal authorization for novel therapies. METHODS: The Connective Tissue Oncology Society promoted a consensus effort in November 2019 to establish how to define ultra-rare sarcomas through expert consensus and epidemiologic data and to work out a comprehensive list of these diseases. The list of ultra-rare sarcomas was based on the 2020 World Health Organization classification, The incidence rates were estimated using the Information Network on Rare Cancers (RARECARENet) database and NETSARC (the French Sarcoma Network's clinical-pathologic registry). Incidence rates were further validated in collaboration with the Asian cancer registries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. RESULTS: It was agreed that the best criterion for a definition of ultra-rare sarcomas would be incidence. Ultra-rare sarcomas were defined as those with an incidence of approximately ≤1 per 1,000,000, to include those entities whose rarity renders them extremely difficult to conduct well powered, prospective clinical studies. On the basis of this threshold, a list of ultra-rare sarcomas was defined, which comprised 56 soft tissue sarcoma types and 21 bone sarcoma types. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, the incidence of ultra-rare sarcomas accounts for roughly 20% of all soft tissue and bone sarcomas. This confirms that the challenges inherent in ultra-rare sarcomas affect large numbers of patients.

Mean Heart Dose Is an Inadequate Surrogate for Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Dose and the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Mean heart dose (MHD) over 10 Gy and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery volume (V) receiving 15 Gy (V15Gy) greater than 10% can significantly increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to characterize the discordance between MHD and LAD dose and the association of this classification on the risk of MACE after radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The coefficient of determination for MHD and LAD V15Gy was calculated in this retrospective analysis of 701 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with radiation therapy. Four groups were defined on the basis of high or low MHD (≥10 Gy vs <10 Gy) and LAD V15Gy (≥10% vs <10%). MACE (unstable angina, heart failure, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and cardiac death) cumulative incidence was estimated, and Fine and Gray regressions were performed. RESULTS: The proportion of variance in LAD V15Gy predictable from MHD was only 54.5% (R2 = 0.545). There was discordance (where MHD was high [≥10 Gy] and LAD low [V15Gy < 10%], or vice versa) in 23.1% of patients (n = 162). Two-year MACE estimates were 4.2% (MHDhigh/LADlow), 7.6% (MHDhigh/LADhigh), 1.8% (MHDlow/LADlow), and 13.0% (MHDlow/LADhigh). Adjusting for pre-existing coronary heart disease and other prognostic factors, MHDhigh/LADlow (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.93; P = .036) and MHDlow/LADlow (SHR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.53; P < .001) were associated with a significantly reduced risk of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: MHD is insufficient to predict LAD V15Gy with confidence. When MHD and LAD V15Gy dose exposure is discordant, isolated low LAD V15Gy significantly reduces the risk of MACE in patients with locally advanced NSCLC after radiation therapy, suggesting that the validity of whole heart metrics for optimally predicting cardiac events should be reassessed.

Statin Use, Heart Radiation Dose, and Survival in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) have a high prevalence of pre-existing coronary heart disease and face excess cardiac risk after thoracic radiation therapy. We sought to assess whether statin therapy is a predictor of overall survival (OS) after thoracic radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 748 patients with LA-NSCLC treated with thoracic radiation therapy, using Kaplan-Meier OS estimates and Cox regression. RESULTS: Statin use among high cardiac risk patients (Framingham risk ≥20% or pre-existing coronary heart disease; n = 496) was 51.2%. After adjustment for baseline cardiac risk and other prognostic factors, statin therapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.91; P = .048) but not major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.52-2.68; P = .69). Among statin-naïve patients, mean heart dose ≥10 Gy versus <10 Gy was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68; P = .022), with 2-year OS estimates of 46.9% versus 60.0%, respectively. However, OS did not differ by heart dose among patients on statin therapy (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76-1.32; P = 1.00; P-interaction = .031), with 2-year OS estimates of 46.9% versus 50.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with LA-NSCLC, only half of statin-eligible high cardiac risk patients were on statin therapy, reflecting the highest cardiac risk level of our cohort. Statin use was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality but not major adverse cardiac events. Elevated mean heart dose (≥10 Gy) was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in statin-naïve patients but not among those on statin therapy, identifying a group of patients in which early intervention with statins may mitigate the deleterious effects of high heart radiation therapy dose. This warrants evaluation in prospective trials.

Association of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Radiation Dose With Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Mortality in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

IMPORTANCE: Radiotherapy accelerates coronary heart disease (CHD), but the dose to critical cardiac substructures has not been systematically studied in lung cancer. OBJECTIVE: To examine independent cardiac substructure radiotherapy factors for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort analysis of 701 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with thoracic radiotherapy at Harvard University-affiliated hospitals between December 1, 2003, and January 27, 2014, was performed. Data analysis was conducted between January 12, 2019, and July 22, 2020. Cardiac substructures were manually delineated. Radiotherapy dose parameters (mean, maximum, and the volume [V, percentage] receiving a specific Gray [Gy] dose in 5-Gy increments) were calculated. Receiver operating curve and cut-point analyses estimating MACE (unstable angina, heart failure hospitalization or urgent visit, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and cardiac death) were performed. Fine and Gray and Cox regressions were adjusted for preexisting CHD and other prognostic factors. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: MACE and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of the 701 patients included in the analysis, 356 were men (50.8%). The median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 57-73 years). The optimal cut points for substructure and radiotherapy doses (highest C-index value) were left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or equal to 10% (0.64), left circumflex coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or equal to 14% (0.64), left ventricle V15 Gy greater than or equal to 1% (0.64), and mean total coronary artery dose greater than or equal to 7 Gy (0.62). Adjusting for baseline CHD status and other prognostic factors, an LAD coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or equal to 10% was associated with increased risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 13.90; 95% CI, 1.23-157.21; P = .03) and all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.09-2.29; P = .02). Among patients without CHD, associations with increased 1-year MACE were noted for LAD coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or equal to 10% (4.9% vs 0%), left circumflex coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or equal to 14% (5.2% vs 0.7%), left ventricle V15 Gy greater than or equal to 1% (5.0% vs 0.4%), and mean total coronary artery dose greater than or equal to 7 Gy (4.8% vs 0%) (all P ≤ .001), but only a left ventricle V15 Gy greater than or equal to 1% increased the risk among patients with CHD (8.4% vs 4.1%; P = .046). Among patients without CHD, 2-year all-cause mortality was increased with an LAD coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or equal to 10% (51.2% vs 42.2%; P = .009) and mean total coronary artery dose greater than or equal to 7 Gy (53.2% vs 40.0%; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cohort study suggest that optimal cardiac dose constraints may differ based on preexisting CHD. Although the LAD coronary artery V15 Gy greater than or equal to 10% appeared to be an independent estimator of the probability of MACE and all-cause mortality, particularly in patients without CHD, left ventricle V15 Gy greater than or equal to 1% appeared to confer an increased risk of MACE among patients with CHD. These constraints are worthy of further study because there is a need for improved cardiac risk stratification and aggressive risk mitigation strategies.

Dose Reduction of Preoperative Radiotherapy in Myxoid Liposarcoma: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Currently, preoperative radiotherapy for all soft-tissue sarcomas is identical at a 50-Gy dose level, which can be associated with morbidity, particularly wound complications. The observed clinical radiosensitivity of the myxoid liposarcoma subtype might offer the possibility to reduce morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a dose reduction of preoperative radiotherapy for myxoid liposarcoma would result in comparable oncological outcome with less morbidity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Dose Reduction of Preoperative Radiotherapy in Myxoid Liposarcomas (DOREMY) trial is a prospective, single-group, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial being conducted in 9 tertiary sarcoma centers in Europe and the US. Participants include adults with nonmetastatic, biopsy-proven and translocation-confirmed myxoid liposarcoma of the extremity or trunk who were enrolled between November 24, 2010, and August 1, 2019. Data analyses, using both per-protocol and intention-to-treat approaches, were conducted from November 24, 2010, to January 31, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: The experimental preoperative radiotherapy regimen consisted of 36 Gy in once-daily 2-Gy fractions, with subsequent definitive surgical resection after an interval of 4 or more weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: As a short-term evaluable surrogate for local control, the primary end point was centrally reviewed pathologic treatment response. The experimental regimen was regarded as a success when 70% or more of the resection specimens showed extensive treatment response, defined as 50% or greater of the tumor volume containing treatment effects. Morbidity outcomes consisted of wound complications and late toxic effects. RESULTS: Among the 79 eligible patients, 44 (56%) were men and the median (interquartile range) age was 45 (39-56) years. Two patients did not undergo surgical resection because of intercurrent metastatic disease. Extensive pathological treatment response was observed in 70 of 77 patients (91%; posterior mean, 90.4%; 95% highest probability density interval, 83.8%-96.4%). The local control rate was 100%. The rate of wound complication requiring intervention was 17%, and the rate of grade 2 or higher toxic effects was 14%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of the DOREMY nonrandomized clinical trial suggest that deintensification of preoperative radiotherapy dose is effective and oncologically safe and is associated with less morbidity than historical controls, although differences in radiotherapy techniques and follow-up should be considered. A 36-Gy dose delivered in once-daily 2-Gy fractions is proposed as a dose-fractionation approach for myxoid liposarcoma, given that phase 3 trials are logistically impossible to execute in rare cancers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02106312.

Preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (EORTC-62092: STRASS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Unlike for extremity sarcomas, the efficacy of radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is not established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone on abdominal recurrence-free survival. METHODS: EORTC-62092 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study done in 31 research institutions, hospitals, and cancer centres in 13 countries in Europe and North America. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically documented, localised, primary retroperitoneal sarcoma that was operable and suitable for radiotherapy, who had not been previously treated and had a WHO performance status and American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2 or lower, were centrally randomly assigned (1:1), using an interactive web response system and a minimisation algorithm, to receive either surgery alone or preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery. Randomisation was stratified by hospital and performance status. Radiotherapy was delivered as 50·4 Gy (in 28 daily fractions of 1·8 Gy) in either 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy, and the objective of surgery was a macroscopically complete resection of the tumour mass with en-bloc organ resection as necessary. The primary endpoint was abdominal recurrence-free survival, as assessed by the investigator, and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who started their allocated treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01344018. FINDINGS: Between Jan 18, 2012 and April 10, 2017, 266 patients were enrolled, of whom 133 were randomly assigned to each group. The median follow-up was 43·1 months (IQR 28·8-59·2). 128 (96%) patients from the surgery alone group had surgery, and 119 (89%) patients in the radiotherapy and surgery group had both radiotherapy and surgery. Median abdominal recurrence-free survival was 4·5 years (95% CI 3·9 to not estimable) in the radiotherapy plus surgery group and 5·0 years (3·4 to not estimable) in the surgery only group (hazard ratio 1·01, 95% CI 0·71-1·44; log rank p=0·95). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia (98 [77%] of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group vs one [1%] of 128 patients in the surgery alone group), anaemia (15 [12%] vs ten [8%]), and hypoalbuminaemia (15 [12%] vs five [4%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 30 (24%) of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group, and in 13 (10%) of 128 patients in the surgery alone group. One (1%) of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group died due to treatment-related serious adverse events (gastropleural fistula), and no patients in the surgery alone group died due to treatment-related serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Preoperative radiotherapy should not be considered as standard of care treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma. FUNDING: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, and European Clinical Trials in Rare Sarcomas.

Angiosarcoma of the Scalp and Face: A Dosimetric Comparison of HDR Surface Applicator Brachytherapy and VMAT.

PURPOSE: Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp is a rare disease with high rates of recurrence. The optimal treatment approach is not well defined. This study presents a dosimetric comparison of high-dose-rate surface applicator (HDR-SA) brachytherapy to volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2018, 12 patients with primary or recurrent angiosarcoma of the face or scalp were treated with HDR-SA brachytherapy using CT-based planning at our institution. For comparison, deliverable VMAT plans for each patient were generated, and dose distribution was compared to the delivered HDR-SA brachytherapy plans. RESULTS: Both VMAT and HDR-SA brachytherapy plans delivered good coverage of the clinical target. However, the dose distribution of VMAT was significantly different from HDR-SA brachytherapy across a variety of parameters. Mean doses to the lacrimal gland, orbit, lens, and cochlea were significantly higher with HDR-SA brachytherapy vs. VMAT. Brain Dmax, V80%, and V50% were also significantly higher with HDR-SA brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: There may be dosimetric advantages to VMAT over HDR-SA brachytherapy for many patients. However, individual tumor location, patient anatomy, and treatment reproducibility may result in HDR-SA brachytherapy being the preferred technique in a subset of patients. Ultimately, a personalized approach is likely to be the optimal treatment plan.