A multicenter randomized, masked comparison trial of natural versus synthetic surfactant for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of two surfactant preparations in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, masked comparison trial at 21 centers. Infants with RDS who were undergoing mechanical ventilation were eligible for treatment with two doses of either a synthetic (Exosurf) or natural (Infasurf) surfactant if the ratio of arterial to alveolar partial pressure of oxygen was less than or equal to 0.22. Crossover treatment was allowed within 96 hours of age if severe respiratory failure (defined as two consecutive arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratios < or = 0.10) persisted after two doses of the randomly assigned surfactant. Four primary outcome measures of efficacy (the incidence of pulmonary air leak (< or = 7 days); the severity of RDS; the incidence of death from RDS; and the incidence of survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 28 days after birth) were compared by means of linear regression techniques. RESULTS: The primary analysis of efficacy was performed in 1033 eligible infants and an analysis of safety outcomes in the 1126 infants who received study surfactant. Preentry demographic characteristics and respiratory status were similar for the two treatment groups, except for a small but significant difference in mean gestational age (0.5 week) that favored the infasurf treatment group. Pulmonary air leak (< or = 7 days) occurred in 21% of Exosurf- and 11% of infasurf-treated infants (adjusted relative risk, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.71; p < or = 0.0001). During the 72 hours after the initial surfactant treatment, the average fraction of inspired oxygen (+/-SEM) was 0.47 +/- 0.01 for Exosurf- and 0.39 +/- 0.01 for infasurf-treated infants (difference, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.10; p < 0.0001); the average mean airway pressure (+/-SEM) was 8.6 +/- 0.1 cm H2O; for Exosurf- and 7.2 +/- 0.1 cm H2O for Infasurf-treated infants (difference, 1.4 cm H2O; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.8 cm H2O; p < 0.0001). The incidences of RDS-related death, total respiratory death, death to discharge, and survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 28 days after birth did not differ. The number of days of more than 30% inspired oxygen and of assisted ventilation, but not the duration of hospitalization, were significantly lower in Infasurf-treated infants. CONCLUSION: Compared with Exosurf, Infasurf provided more effective therapy for RDS as assessed by significant reductions in the severity of respiratory disease and in the incidence of air leak complications.

Effect of pulse dexamethasone therapy on the incidence and severity of chronic lung disease in the very low birth weight infant.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the efficacy and safety of pulse doses of dexamethasone on survival without supplemental oxygen in very low birth weight infants at high risk of having chronic lung disease. Seventy-eight infants with birth weights < or = 1500 gm who were ventilator dependent at 7 days of postnatal age were randomly assigned to receive pulse doses of dexamethasone, 0.5 mg/kg per day, divided twice daily (n = 39), or an equivalent volume of saline solution placebo (n = 39), for 3 days at 10-day intervals until they no longer required supplemental oxygen or assisted ventilation, or reached 36 weeks of postmenstrual age. At study entry, the groups did not differ by birth weight, gestational age, or severity of lung disease. At 36 weeks of postmenstrual age, there was both a significant increase in survival rates without oxygen supplementation (p = 0.03) and a significant decrease in the incidence of chronic lung disease (p = 0.047) in the group that received pulse therapy. Supplemental oxygen requirements were less throughout the study period in the group that received repeated pulse doses of dexamethasone (p = 0.013). The total numbers of deaths and the durations of supplemental oxygen, ventilator support, and hospital stay did not differ between groups. Recorded side effects in the pulse therapy group were minimal and included an increase in the use of insulin therapy for hyperglycemia (p < 0.05). We conclude that in this population of very low birth weight infants, treatment with pulse doses of dexamethasone resulted in improvement in pulmonary outcome without clinically significant side effects.