Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 785: 147284, 2021 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957588

ABSTRACT

Estrogenic compounds are widely released to surface waters and may cause adverse effects to sensitive aquatic species. Three hormones, estrone, 17ß-estradiol and 17α-ethinylestradiol, are of particular concern as they are bioactive at very low concentrations. Current analytical methods are not all sensitive enough for monitoring these substances in water and do not cover mixture effects. Bioassays could complement chemical analysis since they detect the overall effect of complex mixtures. Here, four chemical mixtures and two hormone mixtures were prepared and tested as reference materials together with two environmental water samples by eight laboratories employing nine in vitro and in vivo bioassays covering different steps involved in the estrogenic response. The reference materials included priority substances under the European Water Framework Directive, hormones and other emerging pollutants. Each substance in the mixture was present at its proposed safety limit concentration (EQS) in the European legislation. The in vitro bioassays detected the estrogenic effect of chemical mixtures even when 17ß-estradiol was not present but differences in responsiveness were observed. LiBERA was the most responsive, followed by LYES. The additive effect of the hormones was captured by ERα-CALUX, MELN, LYES and LiBERA. Particularly, all in vitro bioassays detected the estrogenic effects in environmental water samples (EEQ values in the range of 0.75-304 × EQS), although the concentrations of hormones were below the limit of quantification in analytical measurements. The present study confirms the applicability of reference materials for estrogenic effects' detection through bioassays and indicates possible methodological drawbacks of some of them that may lead to false negative/positive outcomes. The observed difference in responsiveness among bioassays - based on mixture composition - is probably due to biological differences between them, suggesting that panels of bioassays with different characteristics should be applied according to specific environmental pollution conditions.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Biological Assay , Endocrine Disruptors/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Estrogens/analysis , Estrogens/toxicity , Estrone , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity
2.
J Hazard Mater ; 323(Pt A): 84-98, 2017 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27156398

ABSTRACT

The evidence that in Northern Italy significant sources of perfluoroalkylacids (PFAA) are present induced the Italian government to establish a Working Group on Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) for PFAA in order to include some of them in the list of national specific pollutants for surface water monitoring according to the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). The list of substances included perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and related short chain PFAA such as perfluorobutanoate (PFBA), perfluoropentanoate (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoate (PFHxA) and perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS), which is a substitute of perfluorooctanesulfonate. For each of them a dossier collects available data on regulation, physico-chemical properties, emission and sources, occurrence, acute and chronic toxicity on aquatic species and mammals, including humans. Quality standards (QS) were derived for the different protection objectives (pelagic and benthic communities, predators by secondary poisoning, human health via consumption of fishery products and water) according to the European guideline. The lowest QS is finally chosen as the relevant EQS. For PFOA a QS for biota was derived for protection from secondary poisoning and the corresponding QS for water was back-calculated, obtaining a freshwater EQS of 0.1µgL-1. For PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA and PFBS threshold limits proposed for drinking waters were adopted as EQS.


Subject(s)
Caprylates/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Fluorocarbons/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Animals , Aquatic Organisms/drug effects , Caprylates/chemistry , Caprylates/toxicity , Environmental Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Fluorocarbons/chemistry , Fluorocarbons/toxicity , Government Regulation , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Italy , Lethal Dose 50 , Risk Assessment , Toxicity Tests , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity
3.
Toxicol Sci ; 141(1): 218-33, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24958932

ABSTRACT

The risk posed by complex chemical mixtures in the environment to wildlife and humans is increasingly debated, but has been rarely tested under environmentally relevant scenarios. To address this issue, two mixtures of 14 or 19 substances of concern (pesticides, pharmaceuticals, heavy metals, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, a surfactant, and a plasticizer), each present at its safety limit concentration imposed by the European legislation, were prepared and tested for their toxic effects. The effects of the mixtures were assessed in 35 bioassays, based on 11 organisms representing different trophic levels. A consortium of 16 laboratories was involved in performing the bioassays. The mixtures elicited quantifiable toxic effects on some of the test systems employed, including i) changes in marine microbial composition, ii) microalgae toxicity, iii) immobilization in the crustacean Daphnia magna, iv) fish embryo toxicity, v) impaired frog embryo development, and vi) increased expression on oxidative stress-linked reporter genes. Estrogenic activity close to regulatory safety limit concentrations was uncovered by receptor-binding assays. The results highlight the need of precautionary actions on the assessment of chemical mixtures even in cases where individual toxicants are present at seemingly harmless concentrations.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Conservation of Natural Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Monitoring , Toxicity Tests/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity , Animals , Environmental Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Monitoring/methods , European Union , Government Regulation , Humans , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...