ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cognitive reserve (CR) is considered a protective factor for cognitive function and may explain interindividual differences of cognitive performance given similar levels of neurodegeneration, e.g., in Alzheimer´s disease. Recent evidence suggests that CR is also relevant in Parkinson's disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the role of life-stage specific CR for overall cognition and specific cognitive domains cross-sectionally and longitudinally in PD. METHODS: The cross-sectional analysis with data from the DEMPARK/LANDSCAPE study included 81 individuals without cognitive impairment (PD-N) and 87 individuals with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI). Longitudinal data covered 4 years with over 500 observations. CR was operationalized with the Lifetime of Experiences Questionnaire (LEQ), capturing the complexity of lifestyle activities across distinct life-stages. Cognition was assessed using a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. RESULTS: Higher LEQ scores, particularly from mid- and late-life, were observed in PD-N compared to PD-MCI [F(1,153) = 4.609, p = .033, ηp2 = 0.029]. They were significantly associated with better cognitive performance (0.200 ≤ ß ≤ 0.292). Longitudinally, linear mixed effect models (0.236 ≤ marginal R2 ≤ 0.441) revealed that LEQ scores were positively related to cognitive performance independent of time. However, the decline in overall cognition and memory over time was slightly more pronounced with higher LEQ scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the association between complex lifestyle activities and cognition in PD. Data indicate that while CR might be related to a delay of cognitive decline, individuals with high CR may experience a more pronounced drop in overall cognition and memory. Future studies will have to replicate these findings, particularly regarding domain-specific effects and considering reverse causal mechanisms.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Cognitive Reserve , Life Style , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Cognitive Reserve/physiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/complications , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Longitudinal Studies , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Neuropsychological TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease that leads to progressive disability. Cost studies have mainly explored the early stages of the disease, whereas late-stage patients are underrepresented. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to evaluate the resource utilization and costs of PD management in people with late-stage disease. METHODS: The Care of Late-Stage Parkinsonism (CLaSP) study collected economic data from patients with late-stage PD and their caregivers in five European countries (France, Germany, the Netherlands, UK, Sweden) in a range of different settings. Patients were eligible to be included if they were in Hoehn and Yahr stage >3 in the on state or Schwab and England stage at 50% or less. In total, 592 patients met the inclusion criteria and provided information on their resource utilization. Costs were calculated from a societal perspective for a 3-month period. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator approach was utilized to identify the most influential independent variables for explaining and predicting costs. RESULTS: During the 3-month period, the costs were 20,573 (France), 19,959 (Germany), 18,319 (the Netherlands), 25,649 (Sweden), and 12,156 (UK). The main contributors across sites were formal care, hospitalization, and informal care. Gender, age, duration of the disease, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale 2, the EQ-5D-3L, and the Schwab and England Scale were identified as predictors of costs. CONCLUSION: Costs in this cohort of individuals with late-stage PD were substantially higher compared to previously published data on individuals living in earlier stages of the disease. Resource utilization in the individual sites differed in part considerably among these three parameters mentioned. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Subject(s)
Neurodegenerative Diseases , Parkinson Disease , Parkinsonian Disorders , Humans , Parkinsonian Disorders/epidemiology , Parkinsonian Disorders/therapy , Europe/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , GermanyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with various non-motor symptoms, including cognitive deterioration. OBJECTIVE: Here, we used data from the DEMPARK/LANDSCAPE cohort to describe the association between progression of cognitive profiles and the PD motor phenotypes: postural instability and gait disorder (PIGD), tremor-dominant (TR-D), and not-determined (ND). METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and neuropsychological six-year longitudinal data of 711 PD-patients were included (age: Mâ=â67.57; 67.4% males). We computed z-transformed composite scores for a priori defined cognitive domains. Analyses were controlled for age, gender, education, and disease duration. To minimize missing data and drop-outs, three-year follow-up data of 442 PD-patients was assessed with regard to the specific role of motor phenotype on cognitive decline using linear mixed modelling (age: Mâ=â66.10; 68.6% males). RESULTS: Our study showed that in the course of the disease motor symptoms increased while MMSE and PANDA remained stable in all subgroups. After three-year follow-up, significant decline of overall cognitive performance for PIGD-patients were present and we found differences for motor phenotypes in attention (ß=â-0.08, SEâ=â0.003, pâ<â0.006) and memory functions showing that PIGD-patients deteriorate per months by -0.006 compared to the ND-group (SEâ=â0.003, pâ=â0.046). Furthermore, PIGD-patients experienced more often difficulties in daily living. CONCLUSION: Over a period of three years, we identified distinct neuropsychological progression patterns with respect to different PD motor phenotypes, with early executive deficits yielding to a more amnestic profile in the later course. Here, in particular PIGD-patients worsened over time compared to TR-D and ND-patients, highlighting the greater risk of dementia for this motor phenotype.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Gait Disorders, Neurologic , Parkinson Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction/complications , Female , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Phenotype , Postural Balance , Tremor/diagnosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Large studies on cognitive profiles of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD-MCI) compared to Parkinson's disease (PD-MCI) are rare. METHODS: Data from two multicenter cohort studies in AD and PD were merged using a unified base rate approach for the MCI diagnosis. Cognitive profiles were compared using scores derived from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease battery. RESULTS: Patients with AD-MCI showed lower standardized scores on all memory test scores and a language test. Patients with PD-MCI showed lower standardized scores in a set-shifting measure as an executive task. A cross-validated logistic regression with test scores as predictors was able to classify 72% of patients correctly to AD-MCI versus PD-MCI. DISCUSSION: The applied test battery successfully discriminated between AD-MCI and PD-MCI. Neuropsychological test batteries in clinical practice should always include a broad spectrum of cognitive domains to capture any cognitive changes.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) is a renowned cognitive test battery, which has been extended in its German version to the CERAD-Plus including tests of executive functions and processing speed. The most commonly used total score (TS) is based on the restricted CERAD version and reflects the sum of selected raw-values (Chandler et al., 2005). The CERAD-Plus extensions might be of particular diagnostic utility for cognitive assessments in Parkinson's Disease (PD), as executive functions and processing speed belong to the most vulnerable domains in PD. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to develop a CERAD-TS based on the extended CERAD-Plus' age-, gender-, and education-corrected z-scores and to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared to the established CERAD-Chandler-TS. METHODS: Baseline data of n = 679 patients with PD (69% male, n = 277 PD without cognitive impairment, n = 307 PD-MCI, n = 95 PD-D) from the multicenter, prospective DEMPARK/LANDSCAPE study were analyzed. ROC-analyses were conducted for four different TS that were either based on the original CERAD or CERAD-Plus, on raw-values or z-scores, and equally-weighted or based on factor scores. AUC-comparisons were conducted to determine the best yet most parsimonious TS. RESULTS: The newly designed CERAD-Plus-TS based on equally-weighted z-scores outperformed both the CERAD-Chandler-TS and cognitive screening instruments when differentiating between individuals with PD of varying cognitive impairment (0.78 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.98). CONCLUSION: Results suggest a high relevance of non-amnestic subscales for the cognitive assessment in PD populations. The proposed CERAD-Plus-TS needs further validation. The extensions might offer diagnostic potential for non-PD populations as well.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Executive Function , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Registries , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The Care of Late-Stage Parkinsonism (CLaSP) study aimed to collect qualitative and standardized patient data in six European countries (France, Germany, Netherlands, Portugal, UK, Sweden) to enable a detailed evaluation of the underexplored late stages of the disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage > 3) using clinical, neuropsychological, behavioral, and health economic data. The aim of this substudy was to provide a health economic evaluation for the German healthcare system. METHODS: In Germany, 228 patients were included in the study. Costs were calculated from a societal perspective for a 3-month period. Univariate analyses were performed to identify cost-driving predictors. Total and direct costs were analyzed using a generalized linear model with a γ-distributed dependent variable and log link function. Indirect costs were analyzed using a binomial generalized linear model with probit link function. RESULTS: The mean costs for the 3-month period were approximately 20,000. Informal care costs and hospitalization are approximately 11,000 and 5000. Direct costs amounted to 89% of the total costs, and the share of indirect costs was 11%. Independent predictors of total costs were the duration of the disease and age. The duration of the disease was the main independent predictor of direct costs, whereas age was an independent predictor of indirect costs. DISCUSSION: Costs in the late stage of the disease are considerably higher than those found in earlier stages. Compared to the latter, the mean number of days in hospital and the need for care is increasing. Informal caregivers provide most of the care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02333175 on 7 January, 2015.
Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Cost of Illness , Europe , France , Germany , Health Care Costs , Hospitalization , Humans , Parkinson Disease/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of patients with proximal femoral fracture within 1 year after hospitalization are presented. In particular, associations between the patients' clinical status and their pre-fracture residence were evaluated (community-dwelling vs nursing home). METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years with proximal femoral fractures were included in a prospective, single-centre observational study and followed for 12 months. Patients' clinical status at baseline was compared to their health status at follow-up 12 months later. Several standardized questionnaires were used to evaluate the patients' functional and cognitive capacity (e.g. Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, Barthel Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination), mobility (timed up-and-go test, Tinetti Test, and Harris Hip Score), quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions index and EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale), and psychological status (Geriatric Depression Scale). RESULTS: This study included 402 patients (mean age: 81.3 ± 8.2 years, 72% women). Patients stayed in hospital for 13.7 ± 6.1 days on average. The comparison of patients' clinical status at baseline and at 12-month follow-up revealed that the Mini-Mental State Examination and Charlson Comorbidity Index remained unchanged (P = 0.527 and P = 0.705), the level of depression (Geriatric Depression Scale) significantly decreased (P < 0.001), and quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions index) diminished (P < 0.001). Although patients' mobility increased after 12 months (P < 0.001 for timed up-and-go test and Harris Hip Score), their functional capacity was significantly reduced (P < 0.001 for Barthel Index and Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale). Nursing home residents showed a significantly higher impairment at baseline than community-dwelling individuals and less improvement in functional and cognitive tests at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes after hip fracture are significantly associated with patients' pre-fracture residence status. Place of residence as well as functional and cognitive status on admission may lead to differences in functional recovery and affect therapeutic and rehabilitative decision-making.
Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/rehabilitation , Homes for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Recovery of FunctionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: IgG-class autoantibodies to N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptors define a novel entity of autoimmune encephalitis. Studies examining the prevalence of NMDA IgA/IgM antibodies in patients with Parkinson disease with/without dementia produced conflicting results. We measured NMDA antibodies in a large, well phenotyped sample of Parkinson patients without and with cognitive impairment (n = 296) and controls (n = 295) free of neuropsychiatric disease. Detailed phenotyping and large numbers allowed statistically meaningful correlation of antibody status with diagnostic subgroups as well as quantitative indicators of disease severity and cognitive impairment. METHODS: NMDA antibodies were analysed in the serum of patients and controls using well established validated assays. We used anti-NMDA antibody positivity as the main independent variable and correlated it with disease status and phenotypic characteristics. RESULTS: The frequency of NMDA IgA/IgM antibodies was lower in Parkinson patients (13%) than in controls (22%) and higher than in previous studies in both groups. NMDA IgA/IgM antibodies were neither significantly associated with diagnostic subclasses of Parkinson disease according to cognitive impairment, nor with quantitative indicators of disease severity and cognitive impairment. A positive NMDA antibody status was positively correlated with age in controls but not in Parkinson patients. CONCLUSION: It is unlikely albeit not impossible that NMDA antibodies play a significant role in the pathogenesis or progression of Parkinson disease e.g. to Parkinson disease with dementia, while NMDA IgG antibodies define a separate disease of its own.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines and related drugs (BZDR) should be avoided in patients with cognitive impairment. We evaluated the relationship between a BZDR treatment and the health status of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 395 AD patients using bivariate and multiple logistic analyses to assess correlations between the prescription of BZDR and patients' characteristics (cognitive and functional capacity, health-related quality of life (HrQoL), neuropsychiatric symptoms). RESULTS: BZDR were used in 12.4% (n=49) of all participants. In bivariate analyses, the prescription was associated with a lower HrQoL, a higher need of care, and the presence of anxiety. Multivariate models revealed a higher risk of BZDR treatment in patients with depression (OR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.45 - 10.27). Community-dwelling participants and those treated by neurologists/psychiatrists had a lower risk of receiving BZDR (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.89 and OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.36). DISCUSSION: The inappropriate use of BZDR conflicts with national and international guidelines. We suggest evaluating indications and treatment duration and improving the knowledge of alternative therapies in healthcare institutions.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Cognitive Dysfunction/chemically induced , Prescription Drugs/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/etiology , Female , Humans , Independent Living , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Quality of Life/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and is further associated with progressive cognitive decline. In respect to motor phenotype, there is some evidence that akinetic-rigid PD is associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline in general and a greater risk of developing dementia.The objective of this study was to examine cognitive profiles among patients with PD by motor phenotypes and its relation to cognitive function. METHODS: Demographic, clinical and neuropsychological cross-sectional baseline data of the DEMPARK/LANDSCAPE study, a multicentre longitudinal cohort study of 538 patients with PD were analysed, stratified by motor phenotype and cognitive syndrome. Analyses were performed for all patients and for each diagnostic group separately, controlling for age, gender, education and disease duration. RESULTS: Compared with the tremor-dominant phenotype, akinetic-rigid patients performed worse in executive functions such as working memory (Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised backward; p=0.012), formal-lexical word fluency (p=0.043), card sorting (p=0.006), attention (Trail Making Test version A; p=0.024) and visuospatial abilities (Leistungsprüfungssystem test 9; p=0.006). Akinetic-rigid neuropsychological test scores for the executive and attentive domain correlated negatively with non-tremor motor scores. Covariate-adjusted binary logistic regression analyses showed significant odds for PD-mild cognitive impairment for not-determined as compared with tremor-dominant (OR=3.198) and akinetic-rigid PD (OR=2.059). The odds for PD-dementia were significant for akinetic-rigid as compared with tremor-dominant phenotype (OR=8.314). CONCLUSION: The three motor phenotypes of PD differ in cognitive performance, showing that cognitive deficits seem to be less severe in tremor-dominant PD. While these data are cross-sectional, longitudinal data are needed to shed more light on these differential findings.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Cohort Studies , Executive Function/physiology , Female , Germany , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Activity/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/complications , Phenotype , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic progressive disorder leading to increasing disability. While the symptoms and needs of patients in the early stages of their disease are well characterized, little information is available on patients in the late stage of the disease. METHODS/DESIGN: The Care of Late-Stage Parkinsonism (CLaSP) study is a longitudinal, multicenter, prospective cohort study to assess the needs and provision of care for patients with late stage Parkinsonism and their carers in six European countries (UK, France, Germany, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden). In addition, it will compare the effectiveness of different health and social care systems. Patients with Parkinsonism with Hoehn and Yahr stage ≥IV in the "On"-state or Schwab and England stage 50% or less are evaluated at baseline and three follow-up time-points. Standardised questionnaires and tests are applied for detailed clinical, neuropsychological, behavioural and health-economic assessments. A qualitative study explores the health care needs and experiences of patients and carers, and an interventional sub-study evaluates the impact of specialist recommendations on their outcomes. DISCUSSION: Through the combined assessment of a range of quantitative measures and qualitative assessments of patients with late stage parkinsonism, this study will provide for the first time comprehensive and in-depth information on the clinical presentation, needs and health care provision in this population in Europe, and lay the foundation for improved outcomes in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02333175 on 07/01/2015.
Subject(s)
Needs Assessment , Parkinson Disease , Aged , Cohort Studies , Disabled Persons , Europe , Female , France , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prospective Studies , Qualitative Research , Research Design , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cost of illness studies are essential to estimate societal costs of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and identify cost-driving factors. METHODS: In total, 108 patients were recruited from 3 specialized neuroimmunological clinics. Costs were calculated for a 3-month period, including direct and indirect costs. The following outcomes were assessed: inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment disability scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Beck Depression Inventory, Charlson comorbidity index, EuroQol-5D, World Health Organization quality of life instrument, and socioeconomic status. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify cost-driving factors. RESULTS: Total quarterly costs were 11,333. Direct costs contributed to 83% of total costs (9,423), whereas indirect costs accounted for 17% (1,910) of total costs. The cost of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) was the main determinant of total costs (67%). Reduced health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms were identified as independent predictors of higher total costs. DISCUSSION: CIDP is associated with high societal costs, mainly resulting from the cost of IVIg treatment. Muscle Nerve 58: 681-687, 2018.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/economics , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/epidemiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/drug therapy , Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating/psychology , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Apathy is a frequent symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD), substantially aggravating the course of PD. Regarding the accumulating evidence of the key role of apathy in PD, time-efficient assessments are useful for fostering progress in research and treatment. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) is widely used for the assessment of apathy across different nosologies. OBJECTIVE: To facilitate the application of the AES in PD, we reduced the AES to two-thirds its length and validated this abbreviated version. DESIGN: Data sets of 339 PD patients of the DEMPARK/LANDSCAPE study without dementia and depression were randomly split into two samples. Data of sample 1 were used to develop a brief version of the AES (AES-12PD). A cross-validation was conducted in sample 2 and in a subsample of 42 PD patients with comorbid dementia and depressive symptomatology. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to determine the optimal cutoff of the AES-12PD as an indicator of apathy. RESULTS: The AES-12PD featured high internal consistency that was better compared to the AES. The abbreviated scale was well differentiated from motor impairment and cognitive deficits. The AES-12PD cutoff of 27/28 was the optimal cutoff for apathy in PD patients without dementia and depression. The cutoff of 25/26 indicated apathy in PD patients with comorbid dementia and depression. CONCLUSION: Results confirm a high internal consistency and good discriminant validity of the AES-12PD. The AES-12PD represents a reliable tool for the efficient assessment of apathy that can be applied in PD patients with and without dementia and depression.
Subject(s)
Apathy , Dementia/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Psychometrics/standards , Aged , Comorbidity , Dementia/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Psychometrics/methods , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The use of antidepressant drugs in dementia patients is associated with the risk of adverse events, and the evidence for relevant effects is scarce. We aimed to determine the associations between the prescription of antidepressants and patients' sociodemographic (e.g., age, gender, living situation) and clinical characteristics (e.g., disease severity, neuropsychiatric symptoms). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 395 institutionalized and community-dwelling patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) across all severity stages of dementia in a cross-sectional study design. The patients' clinical characteristics comprised of cognitive status, daily activities, depressive symptoms, further neuropsychiatric symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). We conducted multiple logistic regression analyses for the association between the use of antidepressant drugs and the covariates. RESULTS: Approximately 31% of the participants were treated with antidepressant drugs, with a higher chance of being medicated for institutionalized patients (χ2-test: p = 0.010). In the bivariate analyses, the use of antidepressants was significantly associated with higher levels of care, lower cognitive and daily life capacity, higher extent of neuropsychiatric symptoms, and a lower proxy-reported HrQoL. Finally, multiple logistic regression models showed a significantly higher use of antidepressants in patients treated by psychiatrists and neurologists (OR 2.852, 95% CI: 1.223 - 6.652). CONCLUSION: The use of antidepressant drugs in the study population was high, and the suitability of the treatment with antidepressants remains unclear. Participants with diminished cognitive and functional capacity, higher extent of neuropsychiatric symptoms, and those treated by neuropsychiatric specialists were more likely to be treated with antidepressants. The pharmaceutical treatment of patients with these clinical characteristics should be particularly considered in the daily care for dementia patients. Further longitudinal studies should evaluate the appropriateness of indications for antidepressants and the causative direction of correlations with the patients' clinical characteristics.â©.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cognition/drug effects , Quality of Life , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/physiopathology , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Cognitive Dysfunction/drug therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The self-assessment of health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment is commonly higher than the proxy-assessment by caregivers. This study aims at evaluating sociodemographic and clinical factors to explain this difference. METHODS: HrQoL of 241 community-dwelling patients was analysed using the dementia-specific Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease questionnaire (QoL-AD). Behavioural and psychological symptoms and functional capacity were evaluated using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale (ADCS-ADL). RESULTS: The self-assessment of patients' HrQoL was significantly higher than the caregiver-ratings (mean difference: 7.4â±â5.6, pâ<â0.001). Considerable influencing factors were the extent of depressive symptoms (GDS), the degree of impairment in functional performance (ADCS-ADL) and the relationship between patients and caregivers. CONCLUSION: Independent variables explained 23â% of the variance in the difference between self- and proxy-assessment of HrQoL. Future studies should include further influencing factors such as caregivers' mental health.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Caregivers , Germany , Humans , Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A restrictive use of antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is recommended due to an increased risk of cerebrovascular events and mortality. We hypothesise that the prescription of antipsychotics is associated with the patients' socio-demographic and clinical status (e.g., dementia severity). METHODS: The prescription of antipsychotics was cross-sectionally evaluated in 272 community-dwelling and 123 institutionalised patients with AD across all severity stages of dementia. The patients' clinical characteristics covered the cognitive status, neuropsychiatric symptoms, daily activities, and quality of life (HrQoL). To determine associations with the use of antipsychotics bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Totally, 25% of the patients were treated with antipsychotics. significantly less frequently than nursing home inhabitants (15.1% vs. 45.5%). Severely demented patients (MMSE 0-9) received antipsychotics most often (51.5%). Additionally, multiple regression analyses revealed a higher chance of prescription for participants with depressive symptoms (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.019-5.160) and those treated by neuropsychiatric specialists (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.408-8.328). CONCLUSIONS: Further longitudinal studies are required to assess the appropriateness of indications for antipsychotics and the reasons for a higher use in nursing home inhabitants and patients with severe dementia and depression.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Institutionalization , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of antidementia drugs (ADDs) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) regarding German guideline recommendations and to assess correlations between the use of ADDs and the patients' characteristics. A total of 395 community-dwelling and institutionalized patients with AD across all severity stages of dementia were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Associations between the prescription of ADDs and patients' sociodemographic and clinical parameters (neuropsychiatric symptoms, cognitive capacity, daily activities, and health-related quality of life) were analyzed in multiple logistic regression analyses. ADDs were prescribed in 46.6% of all participants and less often in institutionalized patients (38.2 vs. 50.4%, P=0.025). Patients with mild-to-moderate dementia had a higher chance of receiving ADDs [odds ratio (OR)=3.752, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.166-12.080 and OR=3.526, 95% CI: 1.431-8.688] as well as those treated by neurologists/psychiatrists (OR=2.467, 95% CI: 1.288-4.726). Overall, 39% of the patients with mild cognitive deficits (Mini-Mental Status Examination 27-30) received ADDs and 21% of the mildly demented patients (Mini-Mental Status Examination 20-26) received memantine. The treatment with ADDs was in part not in line with German guideline recommendations. Particularly, the lower use of ADDs in patients not attending neuropsychiatric specialists should be further evaluated.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cognition/drug effects , Memantine , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Demography , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Independent Living/statistics & numerical data , Institutionalization/statistics & numerical data , Male , Memantine/therapeutic use , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Nootropic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Hip fractures are frequent fractures in geriatric patients. These fractures have great socioeconomic implications because of the significantly higher risk of mortality and institutionalization. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic tool to predict survival without institutionalization within 1 year after hip fracture.A total of 402 hip fracture patients aged >60 years (84% community-dwelling) were included in a prospective observational cohort study. Multiple regression analyses determined independent predictors for noninstitutionalized 1-year survival. Finally, the Marburg Rehabilitation Tool for Hip fractures (MaRTHi) was developed based on these independent predictors.Of the 312 patients who were followed up for 1 year, 168 (54%) survived noninstitutionalized, 104 (33%) died, and 40 (13%) lived in nursing homes. Independent predictors for patients' noninstitutionalized survival included the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score [ASA 1 or 2: odds ratio (OR)â=â7.828; 95% confidence interval (CI)â=â2.496-24.555 and ASA 3: ORâ=â8.098; 95% CIâ=â2.982-21.993 compared with ASA 4 or 5], the Mini Mental State Examination upon admission to the hospital (ORâ=â7.365; 95% CIâ=â2.967-18.282 for 27-30 compared with 0-10), patients' age (ORâ=â2.814; 95% CIâ=â1.386-5.712 for 75-89 y and ORâ=â2.520; 95% CIâ=â0.984-6.453 for 90-99 y compared with 60-74 ys), and prefracture EQ-5D (ORâ=â2.163; 95% CIâ=â1.119-4.179 for EQ-5D >0.80 compared with <0.60). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.756 (95% CIâ=â0.703-0.809), and the sensitivity analysis yielded a MaRTHi score that ranged from 0 to 12 points.The MaRTHi score is the first instrument to predict noninstitutionalized survival with only 4 variables. In addition to 3 well-known factors influencing outcome (age, comorbidities, and cognitive ability), prefracture health-related quality of life was identified as an independent predictor of noninstitutionalized survival. Further studies must be conducted to validate the MaRTHi score and define cutoff scores. Health-related quality of life seems to be an important patient-reported outcome measurement and may play a role in determining patient prognosis.
Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/diagnosis , Hip Fractures/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Area Under Curve , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Fractures/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Middle Aged , Nursing Homes , Odds Ratio , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , ROC Curve , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data on the prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) in Germany are limited. The aims of this study were to estimate the age- and gender-specific prevalence of PD in Germany as well as the severity and illness duration. SUMMARY: A systematic literature search was performed in 5 different databases. European studies were included if they reported age- and gender-specific numbers of prevalence rates of PD. Meta-analytic approaches were applied to derive age- and gender-specific pooled prevalence estimates. Data of 4 German outpatient samples were incorporated to calculate the proportion of patients with PD in Germany grouped by Hoehn and Yahr (HY) stages and disease duration. In the German population, 178,169 cases of PD were estimated (prevalence: 217.22/100,000). The estimated relative illness duration was 40% with less than 5 years, 31% with 5-9 years, and 29% with more than 9 years. The proportions for different HY stages were estimated at 13% (I), 30% (II), 35% (III), 17% (IV), and 4% (V), respectively. Key Message: We provide an up-to-date estimation of age- and gender-specific as well as severity-based prevalence figures for PD in Germany. Further community studies are needed to estimate population-based severity distributions and distributions of non-motor symptoms in PD.
Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Prevalence , Sex DistributionABSTRACT
Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently entails non-motor symptoms, worsening the course of the disease. Apathy is one of the core neuropsychiatric symptoms that has been investigated in recent years; research is however hampered by the limited availability of well-evaluated apathy scales for these patients. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) in a sample of PD patients. Psychometric properties, convergent and discriminant validity and sensitivity/specificity were evaluated in patients with (n = 582) or without dementia/depression (n = 339). Internal consistency was high in the entire sample as well as in patients without dementia/depression. Correlations were moderate for convergent validity (UPDRS I item 4: motivation). While apathy could be differentiated from cognitive decline, it was related to depression (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS-15). The overall classification accuracy based on the UPDRS I item 4 was comparable for AES and GDS scores. The AES exhibits good psychometric properties in PD patients with and without dementia and/or depression. Commonly used screenings on the presence of apathy had low detection rates compared to the AES and reflected both apathetic and depressive symptoms. Psychometric evaluation of available instruments will support further research on the clinical relevance of apathy for disease progression and treatment approaches in PD patients.