Evaluation of knowledge and practices on antibiotic use: a cross-sectional study on self-reported adherence to short-term antibiotic utilization among patients visiting level-1 hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia.

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health problem affecting healthcare systems. Short-term antibiotic non-adherence is thought to be one of the factors contributing to antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to evaluate knowledge and practices towards short-term antibiotic use on self-reported adherence among patients visiting level-1 hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Methods: This was a multicentre institutional-based cross-sectional study conducted among 385 adult participants from 11 September to 30 September 2023 using an adopted structured questionnaire. Analysis of the data involved descriptive and inferential statistics, where significance was determined at P < 0.05. Results: Of the 335 participants, 56.7% displayed good knowledge and 77.3% low adherence towards antibiotic use. 54.6% thought that antibiotics were effective for viral infections, and 43.9% correctly recognized the definition of AMR. Being in formal employment (crude OR: 2.5, CI: 1.08-5.78, P: 0.032) was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of good knowledge about antibiotics while being divorced (adjusted OR: 2.5, CI: 1.23-6.10, P: 0.013) and having good knowledge (adjusted OR: 2.9, CI: 1.73-5.10, P = 0.048) were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of adherence to antibiotics. Regarding antibiotic practices, half (50. 0%) of the respondents had utilized antibiotics in the previous year while 58.2% had taken antibiotics for addressing a common cold. Furthermore, 74% reported to have bought antibiotics without a prescription. Conclusions: This study found that participants attending level-1 hospitals had relatively good knowledge and poor adherence towards antibiotic use. Additionally, the participants demonstrated poor antibiotic use practices in almost all statements related to antibiotic usage.

Prescribers' experiences of, and attitudes to, use of morphine for palliative care at a tertiary hospital in Zambia.

OBJECTIVE: To explore medical doctors' experiences of, and attitudes to, use of morphine for palliative care at a tertiary hospital in Zambia. METHODS: A qualitative, exploratory case study was undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from 14 medical doctors working in the fields of oncology, pediatrics, and internal medicine at a tertiary hospital in Lusaka, Zambia, regarding their experiences and attitudes to prescribing morphine for palliative care. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts was carried out to establish common themes in the data. The study was approved by BSMS and UNZA research ethics committees. RESULTS: All participants agreed that doctors were becoming more comfortable with the prescribing of morphine, although experiences were notably different for doctors working in oncology, compared to other departments. Themes of difficulty discussing end-of-life, poor recognition of pain, and fear of patient addiction, were more prominent in the responses of non-cancer doctors. Morphine use was generally restricted to cancer and sickle cell disease patients, with most non-cancer doctors stating that they rarely prescribe morphine for outpatient use. Training in pain management and the presence of a palliative care team were perceived to be facilitators to morphine prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an increased willingness to prescribe morphine, limited knowledge of pain management, especially for nonmalignant disease, underlies many of the findings in this study. Opportunity exists for professional development in pain management to further improve the acceptance and use of opioids in palliative care, especially for out-patients.