Interventions to Improve Reading Performance in Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether changes to contrast, line spacing, or font size can improve reading performance in patients with glaucoma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five patients with glaucoma and 32 healthy control participants. METHODS: A comprehensive ophthalmologic examination was performed followed by reading speed assessment using the Minnesota Low Vision Reading (MNREAD) test under a range of contrasts (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%), line spacings (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 lines), and font sizes (0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), for a total of 15 tests. Regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of varying test conditions on reading speed (measured in words per minute [wpm]). RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 63.0 ± 12.6 years. Patients with glaucoma showed a visual field mean deviation in the better eye of -6.29 ± 6.35 dB. Reading speeds were significantly slower in patients with glaucoma versus control participants for 14 of the 15 MNREAD tests, despite no significant differences in age, gender, or education between groups. Increased contrast (from 10% to 50%) was associated with faster reading speed in patients with glaucoma (10.6-wpm increase per 10% increase in contrast; 95% confidence interval, 7.4-13.8 wpm; P < 0.001; R2 = 0.211). No significant improvement was found in reading speed with increase in font size or line spacing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with glaucoma showed significantly slower reading speeds than similarly aged control participants. Reading speed was improved by increasing contrast, but not by increases in line spacing or font size.

Is Reading Performance Impaired in Glaucoma Patients With Preserved Central Vision?

PRECIS: Although this sample with glaucoma had preserved central vision, they presented worse reading performance compared with similarly aged controls. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with glaucoma with preserved central vision have impaired reading performance compared with healthy controls. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 35 patients with glaucoma and 32 similarly aged controls with visual acuity better than 0.4 logMAR in both eyes. Each participant had a detailed ophthalmological examination followed by a 5-chart reading performance test using a Portuguese version of the Minnesota Low Vision Reading Test (MNREAD). Correlation between reading performance (reading speed) and ocular parameters was investigated. RESULTS: Participants had an average age of 63.0±12.6 years. In the glaucoma group, mean deviation in the better and worse eyes was -6.29±6.36 and -11.08±0.23 dB, respectively. There was no significant difference in age, sex, rage, education, visual acuity, or systemic comorbidities between groups. Participants with glaucoma had significantly slower reading speeds, with an average of 83.2±25.12 compared with 102.29±29.57 words per minute in controls (P=0.006). Reading speed was slower for all 5 charts. Odds of glaucoma increased by 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.56; P=0.009) for each 10 words per minute decrease in average reading speed, with this relationship maintained after accounting for age, schooling, and visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mild to moderate glaucoma had worse reading performance compared with similarly aged controls, despite both having preserved central vision.