Scales for assessing the therapeutic milieu in psychiatric inpatient settings: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The therapeutic milieu is widely regarded as an important factor influencing experiences and outcomes of psychiatric inpatient treatment. Appropriate scales are needed to assess the milieu. The aim of this review is to identify and describe scales established for that purpose. METHOD: A systematic search of electronic databases was carried out. Scales used in two or more studies were identified, and data was extracted on key characteristics. RESULTS: Scales for assessing the therapeutic milieu were used in 78 studies. Five scales were identified that were used more than once. Four scales originate from 1964 to 1986, one was originally published in 2008. The Ward Atmosphere Scale (WAS) is the most frequently used scale and its psychometric properties have been reported as good. When tested alongside each other, the scales are weakly to moderately correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Few scales have been established to assess the therapeutic milieu. All scales capture aspects of relationships on the wards. The most commonly used scale (WAS) has 100 items and was developed more than 50 years ago. Given the changes in the practice of inpatient care over the last 50 years, new, briefer and psychometrically robust scales should be developed.

Are Group Psychotherapeutic Treatments Effective for Patients with Schizophrenia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Different psychotherapeutic treatments for schizophrenia are delivered in groups. However, little is known about the effectiveness of these group therapies for people with schizophrenia across different treatments with varying therapeutic orientations. This review aimed to (1) estimate the effect of different group psychotherapeutic treatments for schizophrenia and (2) explore whether any overall 'group effect' is moderated by treatment intensity, diagnostic homogeneity and therapeutic orientation. METHODS: A systematic search of randomised controlled trials exploring the effectiveness of group psychotherapeutic treatments for people with schizophrenia was conducted. Random-effect meta-analyses on endpoint symptom scores compared group psychotherapeutic treatments with treatment as usual and active sham groups. Findings on social functioning were described narratively, and meta-regression analyses on group characteristics were carried out. RESULTS: Thirty-four eligible trials were included. A weak-to-moderate significant between-group difference in favour of group psychotherapeutic treatments was found for negative symptom scores (standard mean difference = -0.37, 95% confidence interval -0.60, -0.14; p < 0.01, I(2) = 59.8%) only when compared to treatment as usual and not to active sham groups. Improved social functioning was reported as a treatment outcome in the majority of studies compared to treatment as usual. The 'group effect' on negative symptoms was positively related to 'treatment intensity' (ß = 0.32, standard error = 0.121; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Group psychotherapeutic treatments can improve negative symptoms and social functioning deficits in the treatment of schizophrenia. The effect occurs across different treatments and appears to be non-specific. Future research should identify the underlying mechanisms for the positive effect of participating in groups and explore how they can be maximised to increase the therapeutic benefit.

Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries.

PURPOSE: Whilst formal coercion in psychiatry is regulated by legislation, other interventions that are often referred to as informal coercion are less regulated. It remains unclear to what extent these interventions are, and how they are used, in mental healthcare. This paper aims to identify the attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals towards the use of informal coercion across countries with differing sociocultural contexts. METHOD: Focus groups with mental health professionals were conducted in ten countries with different sociocultural contexts (Canada, Chile, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom). RESULTS: Five common themes were identified: (a) a belief that informal coercion is effective; (b) an often uncomfortable feeling using it; (c) an explicit as well as (d) implicit dissonance between attitudes and practice-with wider use of informal coercion than is thought right in theory; (e) a link to principles of paternalism and responsibility versus respect for the patient's autonomy. CONCLUSIONS: A disapproval of informal coercion in theory is often overridden in practice. This dissonance occurs across different sociocultural contexts, tends to make professionals feel uneasy, and requires more debate and guidance.