Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Heart ; 105(8): 596-602, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30636220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increased longevity in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) is associated with late complications, mainly heart failure, which may not be amenable to redo surgery and become refractory to medical therapy and so, trigger referral for transplantation. We assessed the current role and future prospects of heart and heart-lung transplantation for patients with CHD in England. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of hospital episodes for England for 1997-2015, identifying patients with a CHD code (ICD-10 'Q2xx.x'), who underwent heart or heart-lung transplantation. RESULTS: In total, 469 transplants (82.2% heart and 17.8% heart-lung) were performed in 444 patients. Half of patients transplanted had mild or moderate CHD complexity, this percentage increased with time (p=0.001). While overall, more transplantations were performed over the years, the proportion of heart-lung transplants declined (p<0.0001), whereas the proportion of transplants performed in adults remained static. Mortality was high during the first year, especially after heart-lung transplantation, but remained relatively low thereafter. Older age and heart-lung transplantation were strong predictors of death. While an increase in CHD transplants is anticipated, actual numbers in England seem to lag behind the increase in CHD patients with advanced heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: The current and future predicted increase in the numbers of CHD transplants does not appear to parallel the expansion of the CHD population, especially in adults. Further investment and changes in policy should be made to enhance the number of donors and increase CHD transplant capacity to address the increasing numbers of potential CHD recipients and optimise transplantation outcomes in this growing population.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital , Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Lung Transplantation , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation , Adult , Child , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Disease Progression , England/epidemiology , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Heart Transplantation/methods , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Heart-Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Heart-Lung Transplantation/methods , Heart-Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Needs Assessment , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Reoperation/methods , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Heart ; 105(4): 291-296, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30121631

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the survival and patient outcome in a population of UK patients supported by an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation. METHODS: Data on all adult patients (n=342) who received a HeartMate II or HVAD as a first long-term LVAD between January 2007 and 31 December 2013 were extracted from the UK Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) Database in November 2015. Outcomes analysed include survival on a LVAD, time to urgent listing, heart transplantation and complications including those needing a pump exchange. RESULTS: 112 patients were supported with the Thoratec HeartMate II and 230 were supported with the HeartWare HVAD. Median duration of support was 534 days. During the study period, 81 patients required moving to the UK urgent waiting list for heart transplantation. Of the 342 patients, 85 (24.8%) received a heart transplant, this included 63 on the urgent list. Thirty-day survival was 88.9%, while overall patient survival at 3 years from LVAD implant was 49.6%. 156 patients (46%) died during LVAD support; the most common cause of death on a VAD was a cerebrovascular accident. There was no significant difference between the two devices used in any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of patients with advanced heart failure, who have a very poor prognosis, support with an implantable LVAD allowed a quarter to receive a heart transplant in a 3-year period. Overall survival of the cohort was about 50%. With improvement in technology and in post-LVAD management, it is likely that outcomes will improve further.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart Transplantation , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment , Adult , Cause of Death , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Transplantation/methods , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Time-to-Treatment/standards , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Waiting Lists/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL