Exploring the Contributions of Combined Model Regional Medical Education Campuses to the Physician Workforce.

PURPOSE: Physician shortages and maldistribution, particularly within family medicine, have led many medical schools worldwide to create regional medical campuses (RMCs) for clerkship training. However, Canadian medical schools have developed a number of RMCs in which all years of training (i.e., a combined model that includes both preclerkship and clinical training) are provided geographically separate from the main campus. This study addresses the question: Are combined model RMC graduates more likely to enter postgraduate training in family medicine and rural-focused programs relative to main campus graduates? METHOD: The authors used a quasi-experimental research design and analyzed 2006-2016 data from the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS). Graduating students (N = 26,525) from 16 Canadian medical schools who applied for the CaRMS match in their year of medical school graduation were eligible for inclusion. The proportions of graduates who matched to postgraduate training in (1) family medicine and (2) rural-focused programs were compared for combined model RMCs and main campuses. RESULTS: Of RMC graduates, 48.4% matched to family medicine (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46.1-50.7) compared with 37.1% of main campus graduates (95% CI = 36.5-37.7; P < .001). Of RMC graduates, 23.9% matched to rural-focused training programs (95% CI = 21.8-25.9) compared with 10.4% of main campus graduates (95% CI = 10.0-10.8; P < .001). Subanalyses ruled out a variety of potentially confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: Combined model RMCs, in which all years of training take place away from the medical school's main campus, are associated with greater proportions of medical students entering family medicine postgraduate training and rural-focused training programs. These findings should encourage policymakers, health services agencies, and medical schools to continue seeking complements to academic medical center-based medical education.

Canadian and immigrant international medical graduates.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the demographic and educational characteristics of Canadian international medical graduates (IMGs) and immigrant IMGs who applied to the second iteration of the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) match in 2002. DESIGN: Web-based questionnaire survey. SETTING: The study was conducted during the second-iteration CaRMS match in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: The sampling frame included the entire population of IMG registrants for the 2002 CaRMS match in Canada who expressed interest in applying for a ministry-funded residency position in the 13 English-speaking Canadian medical schools. Those who immigrated to Canada with medical degrees were categorized as immigrant IMGs. Canadian citizens and landed immigrants or permanent residents who left Canada to obtain a medical degree in another country were defined as Canadian IMGs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic characteristics, education and training outside Canada, examinations taken, previous applications for a residency position, preferred type of practice, and barriers and supports were compared. RESULTS: Out of 446 respondents who indicated their immigration status and education, 396 (88.8%) were immigrant IMGs and 50 (11.2%) were Canadian IMGs. Immigrant IMGs tended to be older, be married, and have dependent children. Immigrant IMGs most frequently obtained their medical education in Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, or Africa, whereas Canadian IMGs most frequently obtained their medical degrees in Asia, the Caribbean, or Europe. Immigrant IMGs tended to have more years of postgraduate training and clinical experience. A significantly greater proportion of immigrant IMGs had perceived that there were insufficient opportunities for assessment, financial barriers to training, and licensing barriers to practice. Nearly half (45.5%) of all IMGs selected family medicine as their first choice of clinical discipline to practise in Canada. There were no significant differences between Canadian and immigrant IMGs in terms of first choice of clinical discipline (family medicine vs specialty). There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of times they applied to CaRMS in the past, but a relatively greater proportion of Canadian IMGs obtained residency positions. CONCLUSION: There are notable similarities and some significant differences between Canadian and immigrant IMGs seeking to practise medicine in Canada.

Characteristics of international medical graduates who applied to the CaRMS 2002 match.

BACKGROUND: International medical graduates are an important component of the Canadian physician workforce. For most international medical graduates, the principal route to obtaining a residency position in Canada is to apply through the second iteration of the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) match. In order to help inform the work toward integrating unlicensed international medical graduates into Canada's health professional workforce, our objectives were to describe the demographic and educational characteristics of international medical graduate CaRMS applicants and identify their preferred clinical disciplines and practice locations. METHODS: A 37-item Web-based questionnaire survey was offered to all 659 international medical graduate second-iteration CaRMS 2002 applicants. We collected data on their demographic and educational background and preferred clinical discipline and practice location. Up to 2 follow-up email reminders were sent to nonrespondents. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 70.3% (463/659). Of the respondents, 71.9% had obtained their medical degree in Asia, the Middle East or Eastern Europe: 36.5% had graduated with a medical degree since 1994, and 17.3% since 1997. Most respondents (74.3%) were aged between 30 and 44 years. More than half (54.6%) had completed their medical education in English. Most (69.3%) had done postgraduate training outside Canada. Before coming to Canada, 42.8% had practised medicine for 1-5 years and 45.6% had practised for 6-20 years. The top 5 choices of clinical discipline in Canada were family medicine/general practice (45.6%), internal medicine (14.9%), surgery (7.3%), obstetrics/gynecology (6.7%) and pediatrics (4.8%). Of those who resided in the 4 Western provinces or Nova Scotia, between 76.8% and 86.7% preferred to stay in their own province, and 60%, 51.4% and 37% of those who resided in Newfoundland, Ontario or Quebec respectively preferred to practise in their own province. INTERPRETATION: Second-iteration international medical graduate CaRMS applicants are a heterogeneous group of physicians, some with substantial medical training and experience and others at an earlier stage of their medical career.